• 🌅 ล่องเรือสัมผัสเสน่ห์ทะเลเมดิเตอร์เรเนียน จากเวนิสสู่เอเธนส์ 🚢✨

    ➡️ เดินทางผ่านเมืองท่าที่งดงาม และเพลิดเพลินกับบรรยากาศทะเลเมดิเตอร์เรเนียน พร้อมแวะจุดไฮไลท์ที่คุณต้องประทับใจ 💙

    🚢 แพ็คเกจล่องเรือสำราญ Majestic Princess, Cruise Only 11 วัน 10 คืน

    📍 เส้นทาง : ทริเอสเต (เวนิส), อิตาลี - ดูบรอฟนิก, โครเอเชีย - คอร์ฟู, กรีซ - ซานโตรีนี, กรีซ - คูซาดาซี, ตุรกี (เอเฟซัส) อิสตันบูล, ตุรกี - เอเธนส์ (พิราอุส), กรีซ

    💬 เดินทาง 1 - 11 พ.ค. 2568 // 10 - 20 มิ.ย. 2568

    💵 ราคาเริ่มต้น : ฿68,000

    ⭕️ รวมอาหารทุกมื้อ
    ⭕️ รวมห้องพักบนเรือสำราญ
    ⭕️ กิจกรรมบนเรือ

    📢 รหัสแพคเกจทัวร์ : PRIP-11D10N-TRS-PIR-2506101
    คลิกดูรายละเอียดโปรแกรม : 78s.me/e35400

    📩 สอบถามเพิ่มเติมหรือจองแพ็คเกจได้ทันที!
    https://cruisedomain.com/
    LINE ID: @CruiseDomain 78s.me/c54029
    Facebook: CruiseDomain 78s.me/b8a121
    Youtube : CruiseDomain 78s.me/8af620
    ☎️: 0 2116 9696

    #เรือPrincessCruises #MajesticPrincess #PrincessCruise #ล่องเรือสำราญ #แพ็คเกจเรือสำราญ #Dubrovnik #Croatia #Santorini #Greece #CruiseDomain #thaitimes #News1 #คิงส์โพธิ์แดง #Sondhitalk #คุยทุกเรื่องกับสนธิ
    อ่านน้อยลง
    🌅 ล่องเรือสัมผัสเสน่ห์ทะเลเมดิเตอร์เรเนียน จากเวนิสสู่เอเธนส์ 🚢✨ ➡️ เดินทางผ่านเมืองท่าที่งดงาม และเพลิดเพลินกับบรรยากาศทะเลเมดิเตอร์เรเนียน พร้อมแวะจุดไฮไลท์ที่คุณต้องประทับใจ 💙 🚢 แพ็คเกจล่องเรือสำราญ Majestic Princess, Cruise Only 11 วัน 10 คืน 📍 เส้นทาง : ทริเอสเต (เวนิส), อิตาลี - ดูบรอฟนิก, โครเอเชีย - คอร์ฟู, กรีซ - ซานโตรีนี, กรีซ - คูซาดาซี, ตุรกี (เอเฟซัส) อิสตันบูล, ตุรกี - เอเธนส์ (พิราอุส), กรีซ 💬 เดินทาง 1 - 11 พ.ค. 2568 // 10 - 20 มิ.ย. 2568 💵 ราคาเริ่มต้น : ฿68,000 ⭕️ รวมอาหารทุกมื้อ ⭕️ รวมห้องพักบนเรือสำราญ ⭕️ กิจกรรมบนเรือ 📢 รหัสแพคเกจทัวร์ : PRIP-11D10N-TRS-PIR-2506101 คลิกดูรายละเอียดโปรแกรม : 78s.me/e35400 📩 สอบถามเพิ่มเติมหรือจองแพ็คเกจได้ทันที! https://cruisedomain.com/ LINE ID: @CruiseDomain 78s.me/c54029 Facebook: CruiseDomain 78s.me/b8a121 Youtube : CruiseDomain 78s.me/8af620 ☎️: 0 2116 9696 #เรือPrincessCruises #MajesticPrincess #PrincessCruise #ล่องเรือสำราญ #แพ็คเกจเรือสำราญ #Dubrovnik #Croatia #Santorini #Greece #CruiseDomain #thaitimes #News1 #คิงส์โพธิ์แดง #Sondhitalk #คุยทุกเรื่องกับสนธิ อ่านน้อยลง
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 548 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • The diorama landscape artwork piece reference to the Paros island, Greece.
    #AiImage #IamAmatureAiCreator
    #ตามหากลุ่มAiCreator
    The diorama landscape artwork piece reference to the Paros island, Greece. #AiImage #IamAmatureAiCreator #ตามหากลุ่มAiCreator
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 167 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • 🧵ฐานทัพนาโต้ที่สำคัญของยุโรปอยู่ในระยะที่ขีปนาวุธความเร็วเหนือเสียง ORESHNIK ของรัสเซียจะโจมตีได้ (กระทู้)

    ในคำกล่าวเปิดตัวระบบขีปนาวุธ ORESHNIK เมื่อวันพฤหัสบดี, ประธานาธิบดีปูตินเตือนว่ามอสโกว์สงวนสิทธิ์ "ที่จะใช้อาวุธของเราโจมตีฐานทัพทหารของประเทศที่อนุญาตให้ใช้อาวุธของพวกเขาโจมตีฐานทัพของเรา"

    ต่อไปนี้คือฐานทัพนาโต้ที่สำคัญบางแห่งที่ขีปนาวุธพิสัยกลางความเร็วเหนือเสียงรุ่นใหม่ของรัสเซียจะโจมตีได้ 🧵👇
    .
    🧵KEY EUROPEAN NATO BASES IN REACH OF RUSSIA'S ORESHNIK HYPERSONIC MISSILE (thread)

    In his remarks unveiling the Oreshnik missile system on Thursday, President Putin warned that Moscow reserves the right “to use our weapons against the military facilities of those countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities.”

    Here are some key NATO facilities in reach of Russia’s new hypersonic intermediate-range missile 🧵👇
    .
    Eastern Europe

    ◾ Poland:

    🔸 Lask Air Base (home to permanent US Air Force detachment)

    🔸 Forward Operating Sites Powidz, Zagan and Poznan (US Army weapons and equipment storage)

    🔸 US Army Garrison Poland (V Corps Forward HQ), Poznan

    🔸 Redzikowo Base (home to US Aegis Ashore missile defense site)
    .
    ◾ Latvia:

    🔸 Selonia Military Training Area (the largest NATO training camp in the Baltic)
    .
    ◾ Lithuania:

    🔸 Rudninkai Military Base (future home of Germany's first permanent base abroad; set to station some 5,000 Bundeswehr troops when completed)
    .
    ◾ Romania:

    🔸 Deveselu Military Base (another Aegis Ashore site)

    🔸 Mihail Kogalniceanu Military Base (NATO’s easternmost base in Europe, home to US Army Area Support Group Black Sea regional command)
    .
    ◾ Bulgaria:

    🔸 Bezmer Air Base (key potential storage site for US long range aircraft)

    🔸 Novo Selo Range (major NATO training base)

    🔸 Graf Ignatievo Air Base
    .
    ◾ Kosovo:

    🔸 Camp Bondsteel (set up in 1999 after the NATO bombardment of Yugoslavia and occupation of Kosovo. Largest US base in the Balkans) Northern Europe
    .
    ◾ Finland:

    🔸 Mikkeli (future home of NATO Multi Corps Land Component Command HQ, 150 km from Russian border)
    .
    ◾ Sweden:

    🔸 Karlskrona Naval Base (key to NATO calculations for establishing total control of the Baltic Sea)
    .
    Western Europe

    ◾ Germany:

    🔸 Ramstein Air Base (largest US and NATO air base in Europe, key to US operations in the region and the Middle East)

    🔸 Spangdahlem Air Base

    🔸 NATO Air Base Geilenkirchen

    🔸 Buchel Air Base (stores US nukes)

    🔸 US Army Garrison Ansbach

    🔸 US Army Garrison Bavaria

    🔸 US Army Garrison Rheinland-Pfalz

    🔸 US Army Garrison Stuttgart

    🔸 US Army Garrison Wiesbaden
    .
    ◾ Belgium:

    🔸 US Army Garrison Benelux

    🔸 Kleine Brogel Air Base (stores US nukes)
    .
    ◾ Netherlands:

    🔸 Volkel Air Base (stores US nukes)
    .
    ◾ Italy:

    🔸 Aviano Air Base (stores US nukes)

    🔸 Ghedi Air Base

    🔸 Naval Air Station Sigonella, Sicily

    🔸 Naval Support Activity Naples (HQ of US 6th Fleet)

    🔸 US Army Garrison Italy
    .
    ◾ Greece:

    🔸 Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Crete
    .
    ◾ UK:

    🔸 Royal Air Force Lakenheath

    🔸 Royal Air Force Mildenhall

    🔸 Royal Air Force Alconbury/Molesworth

    🔸 Royal Air Force Croughton, Fairford, Welford (common stopover for US strike and strategic bomber aircraft)

    🔸 Royal Air Force High Wycombe (RAF HQ)

    🔸 Portsmouth Naval Base (home to two-thirds of Royal Navy’s surface fleet)
    .
    ◾ Spain:

    🔸 Rota Naval Base (permanent home to six US missile destroyers)

    🔸 Moron Air Base
    .
    ◾ Portugal:

    🔸 Lajes Air Base, Azores Islands (key NATO transatlantic logistical hub, targetable if Oreshnik can be redeployed from Astrakhan Region to new launch locations somewhere west of Moscow)
    .
    1:33 AM · Nov 23, 2024 · 11.1K Views
    https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1860028770595266957
    🧵ฐานทัพนาโต้ที่สำคัญของยุโรปอยู่ในระยะที่ขีปนาวุธความเร็วเหนือเสียง ORESHNIK ของรัสเซียจะโจมตีได้ (กระทู้) ในคำกล่าวเปิดตัวระบบขีปนาวุธ ORESHNIK เมื่อวันพฤหัสบดี, ประธานาธิบดีปูตินเตือนว่ามอสโกว์สงวนสิทธิ์ "ที่จะใช้อาวุธของเราโจมตีฐานทัพทหารของประเทศที่อนุญาตให้ใช้อาวุธของพวกเขาโจมตีฐานทัพของเรา" ต่อไปนี้คือฐานทัพนาโต้ที่สำคัญบางแห่งที่ขีปนาวุธพิสัยกลางความเร็วเหนือเสียงรุ่นใหม่ของรัสเซียจะโจมตีได้ 🧵👇 . 🧵KEY EUROPEAN NATO BASES IN REACH OF RUSSIA'S ORESHNIK HYPERSONIC MISSILE (thread) In his remarks unveiling the Oreshnik missile system on Thursday, President Putin warned that Moscow reserves the right “to use our weapons against the military facilities of those countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities.” Here are some key NATO facilities in reach of Russia’s new hypersonic intermediate-range missile 🧵👇 . Eastern Europe ◾ Poland: 🔸 Lask Air Base (home to permanent US Air Force detachment) 🔸 Forward Operating Sites Powidz, Zagan and Poznan (US Army weapons and equipment storage) 🔸 US Army Garrison Poland (V Corps Forward HQ), Poznan 🔸 Redzikowo Base (home to US Aegis Ashore missile defense site) . ◾ Latvia: 🔸 Selonia Military Training Area (the largest NATO training camp in the Baltic) . ◾ Lithuania: 🔸 Rudninkai Military Base (future home of Germany's first permanent base abroad; set to station some 5,000 Bundeswehr troops when completed) . ◾ Romania: 🔸 Deveselu Military Base (another Aegis Ashore site) 🔸 Mihail Kogalniceanu Military Base (NATO’s easternmost base in Europe, home to US Army Area Support Group Black Sea regional command) . ◾ Bulgaria: 🔸 Bezmer Air Base (key potential storage site for US long range aircraft) 🔸 Novo Selo Range (major NATO training base) 🔸 Graf Ignatievo Air Base . ◾ Kosovo: 🔸 Camp Bondsteel (set up in 1999 after the NATO bombardment of Yugoslavia and occupation of Kosovo. Largest US base in the Balkans) Northern Europe . ◾ Finland: 🔸 Mikkeli (future home of NATO Multi Corps Land Component Command HQ, 150 km from Russian border) . ◾ Sweden: 🔸 Karlskrona Naval Base (key to NATO calculations for establishing total control of the Baltic Sea) . Western Europe ◾ Germany: 🔸 Ramstein Air Base (largest US and NATO air base in Europe, key to US operations in the region and the Middle East) 🔸 Spangdahlem Air Base 🔸 NATO Air Base Geilenkirchen 🔸 Buchel Air Base (stores US nukes) 🔸 US Army Garrison Ansbach 🔸 US Army Garrison Bavaria 🔸 US Army Garrison Rheinland-Pfalz 🔸 US Army Garrison Stuttgart 🔸 US Army Garrison Wiesbaden . ◾ Belgium: 🔸 US Army Garrison Benelux 🔸 Kleine Brogel Air Base (stores US nukes) . ◾ Netherlands: 🔸 Volkel Air Base (stores US nukes) . ◾ Italy: 🔸 Aviano Air Base (stores US nukes) 🔸 Ghedi Air Base 🔸 Naval Air Station Sigonella, Sicily 🔸 Naval Support Activity Naples (HQ of US 6th Fleet) 🔸 US Army Garrison Italy . ◾ Greece: 🔸 Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Crete . ◾ UK: 🔸 Royal Air Force Lakenheath 🔸 Royal Air Force Mildenhall 🔸 Royal Air Force Alconbury/Molesworth 🔸 Royal Air Force Croughton, Fairford, Welford (common stopover for US strike and strategic bomber aircraft) 🔸 Royal Air Force High Wycombe (RAF HQ) 🔸 Portsmouth Naval Base (home to two-thirds of Royal Navy’s surface fleet) . ◾ Spain: 🔸 Rota Naval Base (permanent home to six US missile destroyers) 🔸 Moron Air Base . ◾ Portugal: 🔸 Lajes Air Base, Azores Islands (key NATO transatlantic logistical hub, targetable if Oreshnik can be redeployed from Astrakhan Region to new launch locations somewhere west of Moscow) . 1:33 AM · Nov 23, 2024 · 11.1K Views https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1860028770595266957
    Like
    Wow
    2
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 912 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • 'รัฐบาลของไบเดนได้ปล่อยให้อิสราเอลก่ออาชญากรรมและรุกรานเลบานอนอย่างต่อเนื่อง' - นักข่าว

    รัฐบาลสหรัฐฯให้การสนับสนุนการโจมตีทางทหารของอิสราเอลในเลบานอนอย่างเงียบๆ, The New Republic เขียน, โดยเจ้าหน้าที่สหรัฐฯบอกกับอิสราเอลว่า สหรัฐฯ จะสนับสนุนการตัดสินใจโจมตีเลบานอนของอิสราเอล, 🤣แม้ว่าประธานาธิบดีโจ ไบเดน ของสหรัฐฯจะเรียกร้องให้หยุดยิงในภูมิภาคนี้ในวันจันทร์ก็ตาม🤣

    [สหรัฐฯ] ยืนยันว่าสิ่งที่อิสราเอลทำ, คือการสังหารนาสรัลเลาะห์, ถึงแม้ว่าจะทำให้พลเรือนเลบานอนผู้บริสุทธิ์หลายร้อยคนต้องเสียชีวิตก็ตาม - และยังทำลายล้างอาคารอพาร์ตเมนต์หลายแห่งด้วย," ดิมิทรี ลาสคาริส กล่าว, ทนายความและนักข่าวประจำรายการ The Critical Hour ของสถานีโทรทัศน์ Sputnik ในมอนทรีออล, ประเทศแคนาดา และคาลามาตา, ประเทศกรีซ ในรายการ The Critical Hour

    รายงานระบุชื่อที่ปรึกษาประธานาธิบดี อามอส โฮชสไตน์ และเบรตต์ แมคเกิร์ก ผู้ประสานงานทำเนียบขาวประจำตะวันออกกลาง, ซึ่งบอกกับเจ้าหน้าที่อิสราเอลว่าสหรัฐฯสนับสนุนกลยุทธ์ของอิสราเอลในการโจมตีทางทหารในเลบานอน ในเวลาเดียวกัน เจ้าหน้าที่บางคนในกระทรวงการต่างประเทศและกระทรวงกลาโหมเตือนว่าการสนับสนุนอิสราเอลอาจทำให้สหรัฐฯเข้าสู่สงครามในภูมิภาคมากขึ้น

    “ก่อนอื่นเลย เราควรยอมรับว่านี่คือการตอบโต้,” นักวิเคราะห์กล่าวเสริม “สิ่งที่อิหร่านทำคือผลจากการรุกรานหลายครั้ง, รวมถึงการทำลายสถานกงสุลในกรุงดามัสกัสเมื่อหลายเดือนก่อน, การสังหาร อิสมาอิล ฮานีเยห์ ในเตหะราน เมื่อเขาอยู่ที่นั่นเพื่อเข้าร่วมพิธีสาบานตนเข้ารับตำแหน่งของประธานาธิบดีคนใหม่, การสังหารเจ้าหน้าที่ทหารอิหร่านและเจ้าหน้าที่ทหารระดับล่างในซีเรียซ้ำแล้วซ้ำเล่า”
    .
    'Biden administration has consistently enabled Israel's aggressions and criminality' - journalist

    The US government quietly backed Israel’s military attack on Lebanon, The New Republic wrote, with US officials telling Israel that the US would support their decision to bomb Hezbollah targets, even with US President Joe Biden urging a ceasefire in the region as soon as Monday.

    “[The US] justified what Israel did, the killing of Nasrallah, even though it obliterated hundreds of innocent Lebanese civilians - and laid waste to multiple apartment blocks,” said Dimitri Lascaris, a lawyer and journalist based in Montreal, Canada and Kalamata, Greece, on Sputnik’s The Critical Hour program.

    The report names presidential adviser Amos Hochstein and White House coordinator for the Middle East Brett McGurk, who told Israeli officials that the US supported their strategy to launch military attacks on Lebanon. At the same time some officials in the State Department and the Department of Defense cautioned that backing Israel could pull the US further into war in the region.

    “We should first of all acknowledge that this is retaliatory,” the analyst added. “What Iran did was the result of an accumulation of aggressions, including the destruction of its consulate in Damascus months ago, the killing of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran when he was there for the inauguration of the new president, the killing of Iranian military officers and a lower-level military personnel in Syria again and again and again.”
    .
    11:48 AM · Oct 3, 2024 · 3,806 Views
    https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1841701828720828546
    'รัฐบาลของไบเดนได้ปล่อยให้อิสราเอลก่ออาชญากรรมและรุกรานเลบานอนอย่างต่อเนื่อง' - นักข่าว รัฐบาลสหรัฐฯให้การสนับสนุนการโจมตีทางทหารของอิสราเอลในเลบานอนอย่างเงียบๆ, The New Republic เขียน, โดยเจ้าหน้าที่สหรัฐฯบอกกับอิสราเอลว่า สหรัฐฯ จะสนับสนุนการตัดสินใจโจมตีเลบานอนของอิสราเอล, 🤣แม้ว่าประธานาธิบดีโจ ไบเดน ของสหรัฐฯจะเรียกร้องให้หยุดยิงในภูมิภาคนี้ในวันจันทร์ก็ตาม🤣 [สหรัฐฯ] ยืนยันว่าสิ่งที่อิสราเอลทำ, คือการสังหารนาสรัลเลาะห์, ถึงแม้ว่าจะทำให้พลเรือนเลบานอนผู้บริสุทธิ์หลายร้อยคนต้องเสียชีวิตก็ตาม - และยังทำลายล้างอาคารอพาร์ตเมนต์หลายแห่งด้วย," ดิมิทรี ลาสคาริส กล่าว, ทนายความและนักข่าวประจำรายการ The Critical Hour ของสถานีโทรทัศน์ Sputnik ในมอนทรีออล, ประเทศแคนาดา และคาลามาตา, ประเทศกรีซ ในรายการ The Critical Hour รายงานระบุชื่อที่ปรึกษาประธานาธิบดี อามอส โฮชสไตน์ และเบรตต์ แมคเกิร์ก ผู้ประสานงานทำเนียบขาวประจำตะวันออกกลาง, ซึ่งบอกกับเจ้าหน้าที่อิสราเอลว่าสหรัฐฯสนับสนุนกลยุทธ์ของอิสราเอลในการโจมตีทางทหารในเลบานอน ในเวลาเดียวกัน เจ้าหน้าที่บางคนในกระทรวงการต่างประเทศและกระทรวงกลาโหมเตือนว่าการสนับสนุนอิสราเอลอาจทำให้สหรัฐฯเข้าสู่สงครามในภูมิภาคมากขึ้น “ก่อนอื่นเลย เราควรยอมรับว่านี่คือการตอบโต้,” นักวิเคราะห์กล่าวเสริม “สิ่งที่อิหร่านทำคือผลจากการรุกรานหลายครั้ง, รวมถึงการทำลายสถานกงสุลในกรุงดามัสกัสเมื่อหลายเดือนก่อน, การสังหาร อิสมาอิล ฮานีเยห์ ในเตหะราน เมื่อเขาอยู่ที่นั่นเพื่อเข้าร่วมพิธีสาบานตนเข้ารับตำแหน่งของประธานาธิบดีคนใหม่, การสังหารเจ้าหน้าที่ทหารอิหร่านและเจ้าหน้าที่ทหารระดับล่างในซีเรียซ้ำแล้วซ้ำเล่า” . 'Biden administration has consistently enabled Israel's aggressions and criminality' - journalist The US government quietly backed Israel’s military attack on Lebanon, The New Republic wrote, with US officials telling Israel that the US would support their decision to bomb Hezbollah targets, even with US President Joe Biden urging a ceasefire in the region as soon as Monday. “[The US] justified what Israel did, the killing of Nasrallah, even though it obliterated hundreds of innocent Lebanese civilians - and laid waste to multiple apartment blocks,” said Dimitri Lascaris, a lawyer and journalist based in Montreal, Canada and Kalamata, Greece, on Sputnik’s The Critical Hour program. The report names presidential adviser Amos Hochstein and White House coordinator for the Middle East Brett McGurk, who told Israeli officials that the US supported their strategy to launch military attacks on Lebanon. At the same time some officials in the State Department and the Department of Defense cautioned that backing Israel could pull the US further into war in the region. “We should first of all acknowledge that this is retaliatory,” the analyst added. “What Iran did was the result of an accumulation of aggressions, including the destruction of its consulate in Damascus months ago, the killing of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran when he was there for the inauguration of the new president, the killing of Iranian military officers and a lower-level military personnel in Syria again and again and again.” . 11:48 AM · Oct 3, 2024 · 3,806 Views https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1841701828720828546
    Like
    4
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 292 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • Understand The Difference Between Ethos, Pathos, And Logos To Make Your Point

    During an argument, people will often say whatever is necessary to win. If that is the case, they would certainly need to understand the three modes of persuasion, also commonly known as the three rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. In short, these three words refer to three main methods that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. As you’re about to find out, the modes of persuasion are important because a speaker who knows how to effectively use them will have a significant advantage over someone who doesn’t.

    The terms ethos, pathos, and logos and the theory of their use can be traced back to ancient Greece to the philosophy of Aristotle. Aristotle used these three concepts in his explanations of rhetoric, or the art of influencing the thought and conduct of an audience. For Aristotle, the three modes of persuasion specifically referred to the three major parts of an argument: the speaker (ethos), the argument itself (logos), and the audience (pathos). In particular, Aristotle focused on the speaker’s character, the logic and reason presented by an argument, and the emotional impact the argument had on an audience.

    While they have ancient roots, these modes of persuasion are alive and well today. Put simply, ethos refers to persuasion based on the credibility or authority of the speaker, pathos refers to persuasion based on emotion, and logos refers to persuasion based on logic or reason.

    By effectively using the three modes of persuasion with a large supply of rhetorical devices, a speaker or writer can become a master of rhetoric and win nearly any argument or win over any audience. Before they can do that, though, they must know exactly what ethos, pathos, and logos mean. Fortunately, we are going to look closely at each of these three ideas and see if they are really as effective as they are said to be.

    Quick summary

    Ethos, pathos, and logos are the three classical modes of persuasion that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. Specifically:

    ethos (character): known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” This is the method in which a person relies on their credibility or character when making an appeal or an argument.

    pathos (emotions): known as “the appeal to emotion.” Pathos refers to the method of trying to persuade an audience by eliciting some kind of emotional reaction.

    logos (logic): known as “the appeal to reason.” This method involves using facts and logical reasoning to support an argument and persuade an audience.


    What is ethos?

    The word ethos comes straight from Greek. In Greek, ethos literally translates to “habit,” “custom,” or “character.” Ethos is related to the words ethic and ethical, which are typically used to refer to behavior that is or isn’t acceptable for a particular person.

    In rhetoric, the word ethos is used to refer to the character or reputation of the speaker. As a rhetorical appeal, ethos is known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” When it comes to ethos, one important consideration is how the speaker carries themself and how they present themselves to the audience: Does it seem like they know what they are talking about? Do they even believe the words they are saying? Are they an expert? Do they have some experience or skills that tell us we should listen to them?

    Ethos is important in rhetoric because it often influences the opinion or mood of the audience. If a speaker seems unenthusiastic, unprepared, or inexperienced, the audience is more likely to discount the speaker’s argument regardless of what it even is. On the other hand, a knowledgeable, authoritative, confident speaker is much more likely to win an audience over.

    Ethos often depends on more than just the argument itself. For example, a speaker’s word choice, grammar, and diction also contribute to ethos; an audience may react more favorably toward a professional speaker who has a good grasp of industry jargon and enunciates clearly versus a speaker who lacks the necessary vocabulary and fails to enunciate. Ethos can also be influenced by nonverbal factors as well, such as posture, body language, eye contact, and even the speaker’s choice of clothing. For example, a military officer proudly wearing their uniform bedecked with medals will go a long way to establishing ethos without them saying a single word.

    Here as a simple example of ethos:

    “As a former mayor of this city, I believe we can solve this crisis if we band together.”
    The speaker uses ethos by alerting the audience of their credentials and experience. By doing so, they rely on their reputation to be more persuasive. This “as a…” method of establishing ethos is common, and you have probably seen it used in many persuasive advertisements and speeches.


    What is pathos?

    In Greek, pathos literally translates to “suffering, experience, or sensation.” The word pathos is related to the words pathetic, sympathy, and empathy, which all have to do with emotions or emotional connections. Aristotle used the word pathos to refer to the emotional impact that an argument had on an audience; this usage is still mainly how pathos is used in rhetoric today.

    As a rhetorical appeal, pathos is referred to as “the appeal to emotion.” Generally speaking, an author or speaker is using pathos when they are trying to persuade an audience by causing some kind of emotional reaction. When it comes to pathos, any and all emotions are on the table: sadness, fear, hope, joy, anger, lust, pity, etc.

    As you probably know from your own life, emotions are a powerful motivating factor. For this reason, relying on pathos is often a smart and effective strategy for persuading an audience. Both positive and negative emotions can heavily influence an audience: for example, an audience will want to support a speaker whose position will make them happy, a speaker who wants to end their sadness, or a speaker who is opposed to something that makes them angry.

    Here is a simple example of pathos:

    “Every day, the rainforests shrink and innocent animals are killed. We must do something about this calamitous trend before the planet we call our home is damaged beyond repair.”
    Here, the author is trying to win over an audience by making them feel sad, concerned, or afraid. The author’s choice of words like “innocent” and “calamitous” enforce the fact that they are trying to rely on pathos.


    What is logos?

    In Greek, the word logos literally translates to “word, reason, or discourse.” The word logos is related to many different words that have to do with reason, discourse, or knowledge, such as logic, logical, and any words that end in the suffixes -logy or -logue.

    As a mode of persuasion and rhetorical appeal, logos is often referred to as “the appeal to reason.” If a speaker or author is relying on logos, they are typically reciting facts or providing data and statistics that support their argument. In a manner of speaking, logos does away with all of the bells and whistles of ethos and pathos and cuts to the chase by trying to present a rational argument.

    Logos can be effective in arguments because, in theory, it is impossible to argue against truth and facts. An audience is more likely to agree with a speaker who can provide strong, factual evidence that shows their position is correct. On the flip side, an audience is less likely to support an argument that is flawed or entirely wrong. Going further, a speaker that presents a lot of supporting evidence and data to the audience is likely to come across as knowledgeable and someone to be listened to, which earns bonus points in ethos as well.

    While Aristotle clearly valued an argument based on reason very highly, we know that logos alone doesn’t always effectively persuade an audience. In your own life, you have likely seen a rational, correct speaker lose an argument to a charismatic, authoritative speaker who may not have the facts right.

    Here is a simple example of logos:

    “According to market research, sales of computer chips have increased by 300% in the last five years. Analysis of the industry tells us that the market share of computer chips is dominated by Asian manufacturers. It is clear that the Asian technology sector will continue to experience rapid growth for the foreseeable future.”
    In this paragraph, the author is using data, statistics, and logical reasoning to make their argument. They clearly hope to use logos to try to convince an audience to agree with them.

    Examples of ethos, pathos, and logos
    Ethos, pathos, and logos can all be employed to deliver compelling and persuasive arguments or to win over an audience. Let’s look at a variety of examples to see how different speakers and authors have turned to these modes of persuasion over the years.


    ethos

    “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.
    He was my friend, faithful and just to me […] You all did see that on the Lupercal
    I thrice presented him a kingly crown,
    Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”
    —Marc Antony, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    In this scene, Marc Antony is trying to win over the Roman people, so Shakespeare has Antony rely on ethos. Antony is establishing himself as both a person of authority in Rome (having the power to offer Caesar a crown) and an expert on Caesar’s true character (Antony was Caesar’s close friend and advisor).

    “During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the world’s first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple’s current renaissance.”
    —Steve Jobs, 2005

    Here, Steve Jobs is providing his background–via humblebrag– of being a major figure in several different highly successful tech companies. Jobs is using ethos to provide substance to his words and make it clear to the audience that he knows what he is talking about and they should listen to him.


    pathos

    “Moreover, though you hate both him and his gifts with all your heart, yet pity the rest of the Achaeans who are being harassed in all their host; they will honour you as a god, and you will earn great glory at their hands. You might even kill Hector; he will come within your reach, for he is infatuated, and declares that not a Danaan whom the ships have brought can hold his own against him.”
    —Ulysses to Achilles, The Iliad by Homer

    In this plea, Ulysses is doing his best to pile on the pathos. In one paragraph, Ulysses is attempting to appeal to several of Achilles’s emotions: his hatred of Hector, his infamous stubborn pride, his sympathy for civilians, and his desire for vengeance.

    “I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest—quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality.”
    —Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 1963

    In this excerpt from his “I Have A Dream” speech, King is using pathos to accomplish two goals at once. First, he is connecting with his audience by making it clear is aware of their plight and suffering. Second, he is citing these examples to cause sadness or outrage in the audience. Both of these effects will make an audience interested in what he has to say and more likely to support his position.


    logos

    “Let it be remembered how powerful the influence of a single introduced tree or mammal has been shown to be. But in the case of an island, or of a country partly surrounded by barriers, into which new and better adapted forms could not freely enter, we should then have places in the economy of nature which would assuredly be better filled up if some of the original inhabitants were in some manner modified; for, had the area been open to immigration, these same places would have been seized on by intruders. In such case, every slight modification, which in the course of ages chanced to arise, and which in any way favoured the individuals of any of the species, by better adapting them to their altered conditions, would tend to be preserved; and natural selection would have free scope for the work of improvement.”
    —Charles Darwin, On the Origin of the Species, 1859

    In this passage, Darwin is using logos by presenting a rational argument in support of natural selection. Darwin connects natural selection to established scientific knowledge to argue that it makes logical sense that animals would adapt to better survive in their environment.

    “I often echo the point made by the climate scientist James Hansen: The accumulation of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases—some of which will envelop the planet for hundreds and possibly thousands of years—is now trapping as much extra energy daily as 500,000 Hiroshima-class atomic bombs would release every 24 hours. This is the crisis we face.”
    —Al Gore, “The Climate Crisis Is the Battle of Our Time, and We Can Win,” 2019

    In this call to action, Al Gore uses logos to attempt to convince his audience of the significance of climate change. In order to do this, Gore both cites an expert in the field and provides a scientifically accurate simile to explain the scale of the effect that greenhouse gases have on Earth’s atmosphere.


    What are mythos and kairos?

    Some modern scholars may also use terms mythos and kairos when discussing modes of persuasion or rhetoric in general.

    Aristotle used the term mythos to refer to the plot or story structure of Greek tragedies, i.e., how a playwright ordered the events of the story to affect the audience. Today, mythos is most often discussed as a literary or poetic term rather than a rhetorical one. However, mythos may rarely be referred to as the “appeal to culture” or the “appeal to myth” if it is treated as an additional mode of persuasion. According to this viewpoint, a speaker/writer is using mythos if they try to persuade an audience using shared cultural customs or societal values.

    A commonly cited example of mythos is King’s “I Have a Dream” speech quoted earlier. King says:

    “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men—yes, black men as well as white men—would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable rights’ of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ ”

    Throughout the speech, King repeatedly uses American symbols and American history (mythos) to argue that all Americans should be outraged that Black Americans have been denied freedom and civil rights.

    Some modern scholars may also consider kairos as an additional mode of persuasion. Kairos is usually defined as referring to the specific time and place that a speaker chooses to deliver their speech. For written rhetoric, the “place” instead refers to the specific medium or publication in which a piece of writing appears.

    Unlike the other modes of persuasion, kairos relates to the context of a speech and how the appropriateness (or not) of a setting affects how effective a speaker is. Once again, King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is a great example of the use of kairos. This speech was delivered at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation at the end of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Clearly, King intended to use kairos to enhance the importance and timeliness of this landmark speech.

    Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    Understand The Difference Between Ethos, Pathos, And Logos To Make Your Point During an argument, people will often say whatever is necessary to win. If that is the case, they would certainly need to understand the three modes of persuasion, also commonly known as the three rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. In short, these three words refer to three main methods that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. As you’re about to find out, the modes of persuasion are important because a speaker who knows how to effectively use them will have a significant advantage over someone who doesn’t. The terms ethos, pathos, and logos and the theory of their use can be traced back to ancient Greece to the philosophy of Aristotle. Aristotle used these three concepts in his explanations of rhetoric, or the art of influencing the thought and conduct of an audience. For Aristotle, the three modes of persuasion specifically referred to the three major parts of an argument: the speaker (ethos), the argument itself (logos), and the audience (pathos). In particular, Aristotle focused on the speaker’s character, the logic and reason presented by an argument, and the emotional impact the argument had on an audience. While they have ancient roots, these modes of persuasion are alive and well today. Put simply, ethos refers to persuasion based on the credibility or authority of the speaker, pathos refers to persuasion based on emotion, and logos refers to persuasion based on logic or reason. By effectively using the three modes of persuasion with a large supply of rhetorical devices, a speaker or writer can become a master of rhetoric and win nearly any argument or win over any audience. Before they can do that, though, they must know exactly what ethos, pathos, and logos mean. Fortunately, we are going to look closely at each of these three ideas and see if they are really as effective as they are said to be. Quick summary Ethos, pathos, and logos are the three classical modes of persuasion that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. Specifically: ethos (character): known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” This is the method in which a person relies on their credibility or character when making an appeal or an argument. pathos (emotions): known as “the appeal to emotion.” Pathos refers to the method of trying to persuade an audience by eliciting some kind of emotional reaction. logos (logic): known as “the appeal to reason.” This method involves using facts and logical reasoning to support an argument and persuade an audience. What is ethos? The word ethos comes straight from Greek. In Greek, ethos literally translates to “habit,” “custom,” or “character.” Ethos is related to the words ethic and ethical, which are typically used to refer to behavior that is or isn’t acceptable for a particular person. In rhetoric, the word ethos is used to refer to the character or reputation of the speaker. As a rhetorical appeal, ethos is known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” When it comes to ethos, one important consideration is how the speaker carries themself and how they present themselves to the audience: Does it seem like they know what they are talking about? Do they even believe the words they are saying? Are they an expert? Do they have some experience or skills that tell us we should listen to them? Ethos is important in rhetoric because it often influences the opinion or mood of the audience. If a speaker seems unenthusiastic, unprepared, or inexperienced, the audience is more likely to discount the speaker’s argument regardless of what it even is. On the other hand, a knowledgeable, authoritative, confident speaker is much more likely to win an audience over. Ethos often depends on more than just the argument itself. For example, a speaker’s word choice, grammar, and diction also contribute to ethos; an audience may react more favorably toward a professional speaker who has a good grasp of industry jargon and enunciates clearly versus a speaker who lacks the necessary vocabulary and fails to enunciate. Ethos can also be influenced by nonverbal factors as well, such as posture, body language, eye contact, and even the speaker’s choice of clothing. For example, a military officer proudly wearing their uniform bedecked with medals will go a long way to establishing ethos without them saying a single word. Here as a simple example of ethos: “As a former mayor of this city, I believe we can solve this crisis if we band together.” The speaker uses ethos by alerting the audience of their credentials and experience. By doing so, they rely on their reputation to be more persuasive. This “as a…” method of establishing ethos is common, and you have probably seen it used in many persuasive advertisements and speeches. What is pathos? In Greek, pathos literally translates to “suffering, experience, or sensation.” The word pathos is related to the words pathetic, sympathy, and empathy, which all have to do with emotions or emotional connections. Aristotle used the word pathos to refer to the emotional impact that an argument had on an audience; this usage is still mainly how pathos is used in rhetoric today. As a rhetorical appeal, pathos is referred to as “the appeal to emotion.” Generally speaking, an author or speaker is using pathos when they are trying to persuade an audience by causing some kind of emotional reaction. When it comes to pathos, any and all emotions are on the table: sadness, fear, hope, joy, anger, lust, pity, etc. As you probably know from your own life, emotions are a powerful motivating factor. For this reason, relying on pathos is often a smart and effective strategy for persuading an audience. Both positive and negative emotions can heavily influence an audience: for example, an audience will want to support a speaker whose position will make them happy, a speaker who wants to end their sadness, or a speaker who is opposed to something that makes them angry. Here is a simple example of pathos: “Every day, the rainforests shrink and innocent animals are killed. We must do something about this calamitous trend before the planet we call our home is damaged beyond repair.” Here, the author is trying to win over an audience by making them feel sad, concerned, or afraid. The author’s choice of words like “innocent” and “calamitous” enforce the fact that they are trying to rely on pathos. What is logos? In Greek, the word logos literally translates to “word, reason, or discourse.” The word logos is related to many different words that have to do with reason, discourse, or knowledge, such as logic, logical, and any words that end in the suffixes -logy or -logue. As a mode of persuasion and rhetorical appeal, logos is often referred to as “the appeal to reason.” If a speaker or author is relying on logos, they are typically reciting facts or providing data and statistics that support their argument. In a manner of speaking, logos does away with all of the bells and whistles of ethos and pathos and cuts to the chase by trying to present a rational argument. Logos can be effective in arguments because, in theory, it is impossible to argue against truth and facts. An audience is more likely to agree with a speaker who can provide strong, factual evidence that shows their position is correct. On the flip side, an audience is less likely to support an argument that is flawed or entirely wrong. Going further, a speaker that presents a lot of supporting evidence and data to the audience is likely to come across as knowledgeable and someone to be listened to, which earns bonus points in ethos as well. While Aristotle clearly valued an argument based on reason very highly, we know that logos alone doesn’t always effectively persuade an audience. In your own life, you have likely seen a rational, correct speaker lose an argument to a charismatic, authoritative speaker who may not have the facts right. Here is a simple example of logos: “According to market research, sales of computer chips have increased by 300% in the last five years. Analysis of the industry tells us that the market share of computer chips is dominated by Asian manufacturers. It is clear that the Asian technology sector will continue to experience rapid growth for the foreseeable future.” In this paragraph, the author is using data, statistics, and logical reasoning to make their argument. They clearly hope to use logos to try to convince an audience to agree with them. Examples of ethos, pathos, and logos Ethos, pathos, and logos can all be employed to deliver compelling and persuasive arguments or to win over an audience. Let’s look at a variety of examples to see how different speakers and authors have turned to these modes of persuasion over the years. ethos “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me […] You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?” —Marc Antony, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare In this scene, Marc Antony is trying to win over the Roman people, so Shakespeare has Antony rely on ethos. Antony is establishing himself as both a person of authority in Rome (having the power to offer Caesar a crown) and an expert on Caesar’s true character (Antony was Caesar’s close friend and advisor). “During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the world’s first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple’s current renaissance.” —Steve Jobs, 2005 Here, Steve Jobs is providing his background–via humblebrag– of being a major figure in several different highly successful tech companies. Jobs is using ethos to provide substance to his words and make it clear to the audience that he knows what he is talking about and they should listen to him. pathos “Moreover, though you hate both him and his gifts with all your heart, yet pity the rest of the Achaeans who are being harassed in all their host; they will honour you as a god, and you will earn great glory at their hands. You might even kill Hector; he will come within your reach, for he is infatuated, and declares that not a Danaan whom the ships have brought can hold his own against him.” —Ulysses to Achilles, The Iliad by Homer In this plea, Ulysses is doing his best to pile on the pathos. In one paragraph, Ulysses is attempting to appeal to several of Achilles’s emotions: his hatred of Hector, his infamous stubborn pride, his sympathy for civilians, and his desire for vengeance. “I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest—quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality.” —Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 1963 In this excerpt from his “I Have A Dream” speech, King is using pathos to accomplish two goals at once. First, he is connecting with his audience by making it clear is aware of their plight and suffering. Second, he is citing these examples to cause sadness or outrage in the audience. Both of these effects will make an audience interested in what he has to say and more likely to support his position. logos “Let it be remembered how powerful the influence of a single introduced tree or mammal has been shown to be. But in the case of an island, or of a country partly surrounded by barriers, into which new and better adapted forms could not freely enter, we should then have places in the economy of nature which would assuredly be better filled up if some of the original inhabitants were in some manner modified; for, had the area been open to immigration, these same places would have been seized on by intruders. In such case, every slight modification, which in the course of ages chanced to arise, and which in any way favoured the individuals of any of the species, by better adapting them to their altered conditions, would tend to be preserved; and natural selection would have free scope for the work of improvement.” —Charles Darwin, On the Origin of the Species, 1859 In this passage, Darwin is using logos by presenting a rational argument in support of natural selection. Darwin connects natural selection to established scientific knowledge to argue that it makes logical sense that animals would adapt to better survive in their environment. “I often echo the point made by the climate scientist James Hansen: The accumulation of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases—some of which will envelop the planet for hundreds and possibly thousands of years—is now trapping as much extra energy daily as 500,000 Hiroshima-class atomic bombs would release every 24 hours. This is the crisis we face.” —Al Gore, “The Climate Crisis Is the Battle of Our Time, and We Can Win,” 2019 In this call to action, Al Gore uses logos to attempt to convince his audience of the significance of climate change. In order to do this, Gore both cites an expert in the field and provides a scientifically accurate simile to explain the scale of the effect that greenhouse gases have on Earth’s atmosphere. What are mythos and kairos? Some modern scholars may also use terms mythos and kairos when discussing modes of persuasion or rhetoric in general. Aristotle used the term mythos to refer to the plot or story structure of Greek tragedies, i.e., how a playwright ordered the events of the story to affect the audience. Today, mythos is most often discussed as a literary or poetic term rather than a rhetorical one. However, mythos may rarely be referred to as the “appeal to culture” or the “appeal to myth” if it is treated as an additional mode of persuasion. According to this viewpoint, a speaker/writer is using mythos if they try to persuade an audience using shared cultural customs or societal values. A commonly cited example of mythos is King’s “I Have a Dream” speech quoted earlier. King says: “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men—yes, black men as well as white men—would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable rights’ of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ ” Throughout the speech, King repeatedly uses American symbols and American history (mythos) to argue that all Americans should be outraged that Black Americans have been denied freedom and civil rights. Some modern scholars may also consider kairos as an additional mode of persuasion. Kairos is usually defined as referring to the specific time and place that a speaker chooses to deliver their speech. For written rhetoric, the “place” instead refers to the specific medium or publication in which a piece of writing appears. Unlike the other modes of persuasion, kairos relates to the context of a speech and how the appropriateness (or not) of a setting affects how effective a speaker is. Once again, King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is a great example of the use of kairos. This speech was delivered at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation at the end of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Clearly, King intended to use kairos to enhance the importance and timeliness of this landmark speech. Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 1385 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • Greek Words For Love That Will Make Your Heart Soar

    What is love? People have had a hard time answering that question for a lot longer than you might think. In Ancient Greece, love was a concept pondered over by some of history’s most famous philosophers, including Plato and Aristotle. Greek philosophers attempted to explain love rationally and often categorized the different kinds of love people could feel. Because we love them so much, we brought together some Greek words—and a Latin one, for good measure—for the different kinds of love you might find out there.


    eros
    Original Greek: ἔρως (érōs)

    Eros is physical love or sexual desire. Eros is the type of love that involves passion, lust, and/or romance.

    Examples of eros would be the love felt between, well, lovers. Eros is the sensual love between people who are sexually attracted to each other. In the Bible, eros was synonymous with “marital love” because husbands and wives were supposed to be the only people having sex. Eros was also the name of a love god in Greek mythology—better known by his Roman name, Cupid—and was the guy responsible for shooting magic arrows at people to make them fall in love.

    The word eros is still used in psychology today to refer to sexual desire or the libido. The words erotic and erogenous, which both have to do with sexual desire or arousal, are derived from eros.


    philia
    Original Greek: ϕιλία (philía)

    Philia is affectionate love. Philia is the type of love that involves friendship.

    Philia is the kind of love that strong friends feel toward each other. However, it doesn’t stop there. The Greek philosopher Plato thought that philia was an even greater love than eros and that the strongest loving relationships were ones where philia led to eros: a “friends become lovers” situation. Our concept of platonic love—love that isn’t based on physical attraction—comes from this Platonic philosophy.

    The word philia is related to the word philosophy through the combining form philo-. Philia itself is the source of the combining forms -philia, -phile, and -phily, all three of which are used to indicate a figurative love or affinity for something.


    agape
    Original Greek: ἀγάπη (agápē)

    Agape is often defined as unconditional, sacrificial love. Agape is the kind of love that is felt by a person willing to do anything for another, including sacrificing themselves, without expecting anything in return. Philosophically, agape has also been defined as the selfless love that a person feels for strangers and humanity as a whole. Agape is the love that allows heroic people to sacrifice themselves to save strangers they have never met.

    Did you know ... ?
    Agape is a major term in the Christian Bible, which is why it is often defined as “Christian love.” In the New Testament, agape is the word used to describe the love that God has for humanity and the love humanity has for God. Agape was also the love that Jesus Christ felt for humanity, which explains why he was willing to sacrifice himself.


    storge
    Original Greek: στοργή (storgé)

    Storge is familial love. Storge is the natural love that family members have for one another.

    Of all of the types of love, storge might be the easiest to understand. It is the type of love that parents feel toward their children and vice versa. Storge also describes the love that siblings feel towards each other, and the love felt by even more distant kin relationships, such as a grandparent for a grandchild or an uncle toward a niece.


    mania
    Original Greek: μανία (manía)

    Mania is obsessive love. Mania is the kind of “love” that a stalker feels toward their victim.

    As a type of love, mania is not good, and the Greeks knew this as well as we do. Mania is excessive love that reaches the point of obsession or madness. Mania describes what a jilted lover feels when they are extremely jealous of a rival or the unhealthy obsession that can result from mental illness.

    The Greek mania is the source of the English word mania and similar words like maniac and manic. It is also the source of the combining form -mania, which is often used in words that refer to obsessive behavior such as pyromania and egomania.


    ludus
    Original Latin: Bucking the trend, the word ludus comes from Latin rather than Greek. In Latin, lūdus means “game” or “play,” which fits with the type of love it refers to. One possible Greek equivalent is the word ερωτοτροπία, meaning “courtship.”

    Ludus is playful, noncommittal love. Ludus covers things like flirting, seduction, and casual sex.

    Ludus means “play” or “game” in Latin, and that pretty much explains what ludus is: love as a game. When it comes to ludus, a person is not looking for a committed relationship. People who are after ludus are just looking to have fun or view sex as a prize to be won. A “friends with benefits” situation would be an example of a relationship built on ludus: neither partner is interested in commitment. Of course, ludus may eventually result in eros—and hopefully not mania—if feelings of passion or romance emerge during the relationship.

    The Latin lūdus is related to the playful words ludic and ludicrous.


    pragma
    Original Greek: πράγμα (prágma)

    Pragma is practical love. Pragma is love based on duty, obligation, or logic.

    Pragma is the unsexy love that you might find in the political, arranged marriages throughout history. This businesslike love is seen in relationships where practicality takes precedence over sex and romance. For example, two people may be in a relationship because of financial reasons or because they have more to lose by breaking up than staying together.

    Pragma may even involve a person tolerating or ignoring their partner’s infidelity, as was common in politically motivated royal marriages in much of world history. Pragma may not sound all that great to many, but it is possible for pragma to coexist alongside other types of love, such as ludus or even eros.

    As you might have guessed, pragma is related to pragmatic, a word that is all about practicality.


    philautia
    Original Greek: ϕιλαυτία (philautía)

    Philautia is self-love. No, not that kind. Philautia refers to how a person views themselves and how they feel about their own body and mind.

    The modern equivalent of philautia would be something like self-esteem (good) or hubris (bad). People with high self-esteem, pride in themselves, or a positive body image practice a healthy version of philautia. Of course, philautia has a dark side, too. Egomaniacal narcissists who think they are better than everybody else are also an example of philautia, but not in a healthy way. The duality of philautia just goes to show that love, even self-love, can often get pretty complicated.

    Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    Greek Words For Love That Will Make Your Heart Soar What is love? People have had a hard time answering that question for a lot longer than you might think. In Ancient Greece, love was a concept pondered over by some of history’s most famous philosophers, including Plato and Aristotle. Greek philosophers attempted to explain love rationally and often categorized the different kinds of love people could feel. Because we love them so much, we brought together some Greek words—and a Latin one, for good measure—for the different kinds of love you might find out there. eros Original Greek: ἔρως (érōs) Eros is physical love or sexual desire. Eros is the type of love that involves passion, lust, and/or romance. Examples of eros would be the love felt between, well, lovers. Eros is the sensual love between people who are sexually attracted to each other. In the Bible, eros was synonymous with “marital love” because husbands and wives were supposed to be the only people having sex. Eros was also the name of a love god in Greek mythology—better known by his Roman name, Cupid—and was the guy responsible for shooting magic arrows at people to make them fall in love. The word eros is still used in psychology today to refer to sexual desire or the libido. The words erotic and erogenous, which both have to do with sexual desire or arousal, are derived from eros. philia Original Greek: ϕιλία (philía) Philia is affectionate love. Philia is the type of love that involves friendship. Philia is the kind of love that strong friends feel toward each other. However, it doesn’t stop there. The Greek philosopher Plato thought that philia was an even greater love than eros and that the strongest loving relationships were ones where philia led to eros: a “friends become lovers” situation. Our concept of platonic love—love that isn’t based on physical attraction—comes from this Platonic philosophy. The word philia is related to the word philosophy through the combining form philo-. Philia itself is the source of the combining forms -philia, -phile, and -phily, all three of which are used to indicate a figurative love or affinity for something. agape Original Greek: ἀγάπη (agápē) Agape is often defined as unconditional, sacrificial love. Agape is the kind of love that is felt by a person willing to do anything for another, including sacrificing themselves, without expecting anything in return. Philosophically, agape has also been defined as the selfless love that a person feels for strangers and humanity as a whole. Agape is the love that allows heroic people to sacrifice themselves to save strangers they have never met. Did you know ... ? Agape is a major term in the Christian Bible, which is why it is often defined as “Christian love.” In the New Testament, agape is the word used to describe the love that God has for humanity and the love humanity has for God. Agape was also the love that Jesus Christ felt for humanity, which explains why he was willing to sacrifice himself. storge Original Greek: στοργή (storgé) Storge is familial love. Storge is the natural love that family members have for one another. Of all of the types of love, storge might be the easiest to understand. It is the type of love that parents feel toward their children and vice versa. Storge also describes the love that siblings feel towards each other, and the love felt by even more distant kin relationships, such as a grandparent for a grandchild or an uncle toward a niece. mania Original Greek: μανία (manía) Mania is obsessive love. Mania is the kind of “love” that a stalker feels toward their victim. As a type of love, mania is not good, and the Greeks knew this as well as we do. Mania is excessive love that reaches the point of obsession or madness. Mania describes what a jilted lover feels when they are extremely jealous of a rival or the unhealthy obsession that can result from mental illness. The Greek mania is the source of the English word mania and similar words like maniac and manic. It is also the source of the combining form -mania, which is often used in words that refer to obsessive behavior such as pyromania and egomania. ludus Original Latin: Bucking the trend, the word ludus comes from Latin rather than Greek. In Latin, lūdus means “game” or “play,” which fits with the type of love it refers to. One possible Greek equivalent is the word ερωτοτροπία, meaning “courtship.” Ludus is playful, noncommittal love. Ludus covers things like flirting, seduction, and casual sex. Ludus means “play” or “game” in Latin, and that pretty much explains what ludus is: love as a game. When it comes to ludus, a person is not looking for a committed relationship. People who are after ludus are just looking to have fun or view sex as a prize to be won. A “friends with benefits” situation would be an example of a relationship built on ludus: neither partner is interested in commitment. Of course, ludus may eventually result in eros—and hopefully not mania—if feelings of passion or romance emerge during the relationship. The Latin lūdus is related to the playful words ludic and ludicrous. pragma Original Greek: πράγμα (prágma) Pragma is practical love. Pragma is love based on duty, obligation, or logic. Pragma is the unsexy love that you might find in the political, arranged marriages throughout history. This businesslike love is seen in relationships where practicality takes precedence over sex and romance. For example, two people may be in a relationship because of financial reasons or because they have more to lose by breaking up than staying together. Pragma may even involve a person tolerating or ignoring their partner’s infidelity, as was common in politically motivated royal marriages in much of world history. Pragma may not sound all that great to many, but it is possible for pragma to coexist alongside other types of love, such as ludus or even eros. As you might have guessed, pragma is related to pragmatic, a word that is all about practicality. philautia Original Greek: ϕιλαυτία (philautía) Philautia is self-love. No, not that kind. Philautia refers to how a person views themselves and how they feel about their own body and mind. The modern equivalent of philautia would be something like self-esteem (good) or hubris (bad). People with high self-esteem, pride in themselves, or a positive body image practice a healthy version of philautia. Of course, philautia has a dark side, too. Egomaniacal narcissists who think they are better than everybody else are also an example of philautia, but not in a healthy way. The duality of philautia just goes to show that love, even self-love, can often get pretty complicated. Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 873 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว