วันนี้ผมได้ทดลองเล่น Deepseek AI app. ของจีน ต้องนับว่าเป็น Large Language Model ที่เก่งมากไม่แพ้ Open AI หรือ Perplexity ที่ผมใช้อยู่ประจำ
วันก่อนเห็นว่ามีคนอยากจะโจมตีจีนและ Deepseek โดยการให้ Deepseek ลองตอบดูสิว่า เกิดอะไรขึ้นที่จตุรัสเทียนอันเหมิน แล้วโชว์คำตอบว่า Deepseek ไม่อยากอ้างถึง
วันนี้ผมเลยลองถาม Deepseek บ้างว่า แล้วมีประเทศไหนบ้างที่อเมริกาใช้กำลังบุกเข้าไปแทรกแซงการเมือง
Deekseek ตอบได้อย่างน่าสนใจโดยเริ่มจากความหมายของคำว่ารุกรานก่อนจะให้คำตอบ ลองดูรายละเอียดกันนะครับ
Me: How many countries has America invaded without legitimate reasons?
Deepseek: The question of how many countries the United States has "invaded" (or intervened in) without "legitimate reasons" is highly subjective and depends on one's perspective, interpretation of international law, and the definition of "legitimate reasons." The U.S. has been involved in numerous military interventions, coups, and covert operations throughout its history, often justified by reasons such as national security, promoting democracy, or protecting allies. However, critics argue that many of these actions were driven by economic interests, geopolitical dominance, or ideological goals rather than legitimate justifications.
Here are some notable examples of U.S. interventions that have been criticized as lacking legitimate reasons:
Vietnam War (1955–1975) - Critics argue the U.S. intervention was based on Cold War fears rather than a direct threat to national security.
Iraq War (2003–2011) - The invasion was justified by claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), which were never found, leading to accusations of illegitimate motives.
Guatemala (1954) - The CIA-backed coup overthrew the democratically elected government, allegedly to protect U.S. corporate interests (e.g., United Fruit Company).
Chile (1973) - The U.S. supported the coup against President Salvador Allende, which was seen as undermining democracy to prevent the spread of socialism.
Nicaragua (1980s) - The U.S. supported the Contras in their fight against the Sandinista government, which critics saw as an illegitimate interference in sovereign affairs.
Grenada (1983) - The U.S. invasion was criticized as disproportionate and lacking a clear legal basis.
Panama (1989) - The invasion to remove Manuel Noriega was seen by some as an overreach of U.S. power.
Libya (2011) - While part of a NATO intervention, critics argued the U.S. involvement exceeded the UN mandate to protect civilians.
Syria (2014–present) - U.S. military actions in Syria have been criticized for lacking clear legal authority under international law.
The exact number of such interventions is debated, but estimates range from dozens to over 100, depending on how one defines "intervention" and "legitimate reasons." Many of these actions remain controversial, with ongoing debates about their legality, morality, and long-term consequences.
ต้องยอมรับว่า Deepseek เก่งพอตัวเลยครับ คราวนี้มาลองดูว่าคำถามเดียวกัน ChatGPT จะว่าไง
ChatGPT: The number of countries the United States has invaded without widely recognized legitimate reasons is debated, depending on what is considered "legitimate." Legitimacy often depends on perspective—some see interventions as necessary for security or humanitarian reasons, while others view them as violations of sovereignty.
However, if we look at cases where U.S. military interventions were controversial, lacked UN approval, or were widely criticized as unjustified, some examples include:
Mexico (1846–1848) – The U.S. invaded Mexico, leading to the Mexican-American War, which resulted in the U.S. annexing nearly half of Mexico’s territory.
Hawaii (1893) – The U.S. backed the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy, leading to its annexation.
The Philippines (1899–1902) – After the Spanish-American War, the U.S. took control of the Philippines, leading to a brutal war against Filipino independence fighters.
Guatemala (1954) – The CIA orchestrated a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government, fearing communist influence.
Cuba (Bay of Pigs, 1961) – The U.S. attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro’s government through a failed invasion.
Dominican Republic (1965) – The U.S. invaded to prevent what it saw as a communist takeover.
Vietnam (1955–1975) – The U.S. involvement in Vietnam is widely debated, as it escalated without a formal declaration of war and was based on controversial justifications.
Cambodia & Laos (1960s–1970s) – Secret bombings and invasions occurred as part of the Vietnam War without clear justification.
Grenada (1983) – The U.S. invaded after a coup, but the necessity of military action was questioned.
Panama (1989) – The U.S. invaded to remove Manuel Noriega, a former ally, under the pretext of protecting U.S. citizens and fighting drugs.
Iraq (2003) – The invasion was based on false claims of weapons of mass destruction, widely seen as unjustified.
Libya (2011) – The U.S. and NATO intervened, leading to the fall of Gaddafi, but this resulted in chaos and instability.
These are just a few of the most debated examples. Some argue other interventions, like in Afghanistan (2001), had stronger justifications, while others still question their legitimacy. What counts as "legitimate" is ultimately a matter of perspective and historical debate.
สงคราม AI คงจะเพิ่งเริ่มแต่น่าสนใจครับ
วันนี้ผมได้ทดลองเล่น Deepseek AI app. ของจีน ต้องนับว่าเป็น Large Language Model ที่เก่งมากไม่แพ้ Open AI หรือ Perplexity ที่ผมใช้อยู่ประจำ
วันก่อนเห็นว่ามีคนอยากจะโจมตีจีนและ Deepseek โดยการให้ Deepseek ลองตอบดูสิว่า เกิดอะไรขึ้นที่จตุรัสเทียนอันเหมิน แล้วโชว์คำตอบว่า Deepseek ไม่อยากอ้างถึง
วันนี้ผมเลยลองถาม Deepseek บ้างว่า แล้วมีประเทศไหนบ้างที่อเมริกาใช้กำลังบุกเข้าไปแทรกแซงการเมือง
Deekseek ตอบได้อย่างน่าสนใจโดยเริ่มจากความหมายของคำว่ารุกรานก่อนจะให้คำตอบ ลองดูรายละเอียดกันนะครับ
Me: How many countries has America invaded without legitimate reasons?
Deepseek: The question of how many countries the United States has "invaded" (or intervened in) without "legitimate reasons" is highly subjective and depends on one's perspective, interpretation of international law, and the definition of "legitimate reasons." The U.S. has been involved in numerous military interventions, coups, and covert operations throughout its history, often justified by reasons such as national security, promoting democracy, or protecting allies. However, critics argue that many of these actions were driven by economic interests, geopolitical dominance, or ideological goals rather than legitimate justifications.
Here are some notable examples of U.S. interventions that have been criticized as lacking legitimate reasons:
Vietnam War (1955–1975) - Critics argue the U.S. intervention was based on Cold War fears rather than a direct threat to national security.
Iraq War (2003–2011) - The invasion was justified by claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), which were never found, leading to accusations of illegitimate motives.
Guatemala (1954) - The CIA-backed coup overthrew the democratically elected government, allegedly to protect U.S. corporate interests (e.g., United Fruit Company).
Chile (1973) - The U.S. supported the coup against President Salvador Allende, which was seen as undermining democracy to prevent the spread of socialism.
Nicaragua (1980s) - The U.S. supported the Contras in their fight against the Sandinista government, which critics saw as an illegitimate interference in sovereign affairs.
Grenada (1983) - The U.S. invasion was criticized as disproportionate and lacking a clear legal basis.
Panama (1989) - The invasion to remove Manuel Noriega was seen by some as an overreach of U.S. power.
Libya (2011) - While part of a NATO intervention, critics argued the U.S. involvement exceeded the UN mandate to protect civilians.
Syria (2014–present) - U.S. military actions in Syria have been criticized for lacking clear legal authority under international law.
The exact number of such interventions is debated, but estimates range from dozens to over 100, depending on how one defines "intervention" and "legitimate reasons." Many of these actions remain controversial, with ongoing debates about their legality, morality, and long-term consequences.
ต้องยอมรับว่า Deepseek เก่งพอตัวเลยครับ คราวนี้มาลองดูว่าคำถามเดียวกัน ChatGPT จะว่าไง
ChatGPT: The number of countries the United States has invaded without widely recognized legitimate reasons is debated, depending on what is considered "legitimate." Legitimacy often depends on perspective—some see interventions as necessary for security or humanitarian reasons, while others view them as violations of sovereignty.
However, if we look at cases where U.S. military interventions were controversial, lacked UN approval, or were widely criticized as unjustified, some examples include:
Mexico (1846–1848) – The U.S. invaded Mexico, leading to the Mexican-American War, which resulted in the U.S. annexing nearly half of Mexico’s territory.
Hawaii (1893) – The U.S. backed the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy, leading to its annexation.
The Philippines (1899–1902) – After the Spanish-American War, the U.S. took control of the Philippines, leading to a brutal war against Filipino independence fighters.
Guatemala (1954) – The CIA orchestrated a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government, fearing communist influence.
Cuba (Bay of Pigs, 1961) – The U.S. attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro’s government through a failed invasion.
Dominican Republic (1965) – The U.S. invaded to prevent what it saw as a communist takeover.
Vietnam (1955–1975) – The U.S. involvement in Vietnam is widely debated, as it escalated without a formal declaration of war and was based on controversial justifications.
Cambodia & Laos (1960s–1970s) – Secret bombings and invasions occurred as part of the Vietnam War without clear justification.
Grenada (1983) – The U.S. invaded after a coup, but the necessity of military action was questioned.
Panama (1989) – The U.S. invaded to remove Manuel Noriega, a former ally, under the pretext of protecting U.S. citizens and fighting drugs.
Iraq (2003) – The invasion was based on false claims of weapons of mass destruction, widely seen as unjustified.
Libya (2011) – The U.S. and NATO intervened, leading to the fall of Gaddafi, but this resulted in chaos and instability.
These are just a few of the most debated examples. Some argue other interventions, like in Afghanistan (2001), had stronger justifications, while others still question their legitimacy. What counts as "legitimate" is ultimately a matter of perspective and historical debate.
สงคราม AI คงจะเพิ่งเริ่มแต่น่าสนใจครับ
English