• āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĨāđˆāļēāļˆāļēāļāļ§āļ­āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ•āļąāļ™: āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­ AI āļ–āļđāļāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĨāļšāļ„āļĢāļķāđˆāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡

    āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļāļĨāļąāļšāļĄāļēāļ”āļģāļĢāļ‡āļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ˜āļēāļ™āļēāļ˜āļīāļšāļ”āļĩāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļŠāļļāļ”āđ‚āļ•āđˆāāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡ 50%! āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļ·āļ­ “DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool” āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ›āļąāļāļāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļīāļĐāļāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­ DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄāļĩ Elon Musk āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģ

    AI āļ•āļąāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ–āļđāļāļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāļĄāļēāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļāļ§āđˆāļē 200,000 āļ‰āļšāļąāļš āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļ 100,000 āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆ “āđ„āļĄāđˆāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļēāļĄāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ” āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĨāļšāļ­āļ­āļ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡ 1.5 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĩ āđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļ”āļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļ‡āļˆāļēāļ 3.6 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡āđ€āļŦāļĨāļ·āļ­āđāļ„āđˆ 36 āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡!

    āđāļ•āđˆāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđāļšāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļāđ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđˆāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļœāļīāļ”āļžāļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡ āđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļēāļˆāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆ

    DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļĨāļš 100,000 āļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒ
    āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļāļ§āđˆāļē 200,000 āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļēāļĄāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ
    āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āđƒāļ™ HUD āđāļĨāļ° CFPB āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™ “100% āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĒāļāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļāļŽ” āļ—āļĩāđˆ CFPB

    āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļŦāļēāļĻāļēāļĨ
    āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡ $1.5 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĩ
    āļĨāļ”āļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļēāļ 3.6 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡āđ€āļŦāļĨāļ·āļ­āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡ 36 āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡

    DOGE āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļĨāļĒāļļāļ—āļ˜āđŒ “AI-first” āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĩ 2025
    āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāļāļąāļ‡ AI āđƒāļ™āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļĄāļĩāļ™āļēāļ„āļĄ
    āđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āļ•āļąāļ§āđāļŠāļ•āļšāļ­āļ— GSAi āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļ§āđˆāļē 1,500 āļ„āļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™

    āđāļœāļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļģāļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āļŠāļąāļāļāļēāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒ
    āļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļāļ„āļģāļŠāļąāđˆāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­ 31 āļĄāļāļĢāļēāļ„āļĄ 2025 āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĒāļāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļāļŽ 10 āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļ­āļāđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ 1 āļ‰āļšāļąāļš
    DOGE āļ–āļđāļāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļœāļĨāļąāļāļ”āļąāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĢāļ‡

    AI āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļœāļīāļ”āļžāļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡
    āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ HUD āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē AI āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āļ§āđˆāļēāļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ–āļđāļāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļīāļ”
    āļ­āļēāļˆāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆ

    āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĨāļšāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ­āļēāļˆāļ‚āļąāļ”āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ›āļāļ„āļĢāļ­āļ‡ (Administrative Procedure Act)
    āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļĩāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļāļŽ
    āļāļēāļĢāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļē “AI āļšāļ­āļāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĨā āļ­āļēāļˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĻāļēāļĨ

    āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ­āļąāļ•āđ‚āļ™āļĄāļąāļ•āļīāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ­āļēāļˆāļĨāļ”āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļąāļāđāļĨāļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļŠāļēāļ
    āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļˆāļ°āļ–āļđāļāđāļ—āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ­āļąāļĨāļāļ­āļĢāļīāļ˜āļķāļĄ
    āļ­āļēāļˆāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļœāļīāļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ

    DOGE āđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄāļĩāļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ āļąāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™āđˆāļēāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļ·āļ­
    āđ€āļ§āđ‡āļšāđ„āļ‹āļ•āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ DOGE āđ€āļ„āļĒāļ–āļđāļāđ€āļˆāļēāļ°āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆ
    āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļšāļēāļ‡āļ„āļ™āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āđˆāļēāļŠāļ‡āļŠāļąāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ–āļđāļāļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđ‚āļˆāļĄāļ•āļĩ

    https://www.techspot.com/news/108826-doge-wants-use-ai-tool-eliminate-half-all.html
    🧠 āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĨāđˆāļēāļˆāļēāļāļ§āļ­āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ•āļąāļ™: āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­ AI āļ–āļđāļāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĨāļšāļ„āļĢāļķāđˆāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡ āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļāļĨāļąāļšāļĄāļēāļ”āļģāļĢāļ‡āļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ˜āļēāļ™āļēāļ˜āļīāļšāļ”āļĩāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļŠāļļāļ”āđ‚āļ•āđˆāāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡ 50%! āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļ·āļ­ “DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool” āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ›āļąāļāļāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ”āļīāļĐāļāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­ DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄāļĩ Elon Musk āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģ AI āļ•āļąāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ–āļđāļāļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāļĄāļēāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļāļ§āđˆāļē 200,000 āļ‰āļšāļąāļš āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļ 100,000 āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆ “āđ„āļĄāđˆāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļēāļĄāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ” āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĨāļšāļ­āļ­āļ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡ 1.5 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĩ āđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļ”āļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļ‡āļˆāļēāļ 3.6 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡āđ€āļŦāļĨāļ·āļ­āđāļ„āđˆ 36 āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡! āđāļ•āđˆāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđāļšāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļāđ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđˆāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļœāļīāļ”āļžāļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡ āđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļēāļˆāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆ âœ… DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļĨāļš 100,000 āļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒ ➡ïļ āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļāļ§āđˆāļē 200,000 āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļēāļĄāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ âžĄïļ āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āđƒāļ™ HUD āđāļĨāļ° CFPB āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™ “100% āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĒāļāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļāļŽ” āļ—āļĩāđˆ CFPB ✅ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļŦāļēāļĻāļēāļĨ ➡ïļ āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡ $1.5 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĩ ➡ïļ āļĨāļ”āļ āļēāļĢāļ°āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļēāļ 3.6 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡āđ€āļŦāļĨāļ·āļ­āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡ 36 āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡ âœ… DOGE āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļĨāļĒāļļāļ—āļ˜āđŒ “AI-first” āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĩ 2025 ➡ïļ āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāļāļąāļ‡ AI āđƒāļ™āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļĄāļĩāļ™āļēāļ„āļĄ âžĄïļ āđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āļ•āļąāļ§āđāļŠāļ•āļšāļ­āļ— GSAi āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļ§āđˆāļē 1,500 āļ„āļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™ âœ… āđāļœāļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļģāļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āļŠāļąāļāļāļēāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒ ➡ïļ āļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļāļ„āļģāļŠāļąāđˆāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­ 31 āļĄāļāļĢāļēāļ„āļĄ 2025 āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĒāļāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļāļŽ 10 āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļ­āļāđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ 1 āļ‰āļšāļąāļš âžĄïļ DOGE āļ–āļđāļāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļœāļĨāļąāļāļ”āļąāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĢāļ‡ â€žïļ AI āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļœāļīāļ”āļžāļĨāļēāļ”āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡ â›” āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ HUD āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē AI āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āļ§āđˆāļēāļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ–āļđāļāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļīāļ” â›” āļ­āļēāļˆāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆ â€žïļ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĨāļšāļāļŽāļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ­āļēāļˆāļ‚āļąāļ”āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ›āļāļ„āļĢāļ­āļ‡ (Administrative Procedure Act) ⛔ āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļĩāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļāļŽ â›” āļāļēāļĢāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļē “AI āļšāļ­āļāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĨā āļ­āļēāļˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĻāļēāļĨ ‾ïļ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ­āļąāļ•āđ‚āļ™āļĄāļąāļ•āļīāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ­āļēāļˆāļĨāļ”āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļąāļāđāļĨāļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļŠāļēāļ â›” āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļˆāļ°āļ–āļđāļāđāļ—āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ­āļąāļĨāļāļ­āļĢāļīāļ˜āļķāļĄ â›” āļ­āļēāļˆāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļœāļīāļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ ‾ïļ DOGE āđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄāļĩāļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ āļąāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™āđˆāļēāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļ·āļ­ â›” āđ€āļ§āđ‡āļšāđ„āļ‹āļ•āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ DOGE āđ€āļ„āļĒāļ–āļđāļāđ€āļˆāļēāļ°āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆ â›” āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļšāļēāļ‡āļ„āļ™āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āđˆāļēāļŠāļ‡āļŠāļąāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ–āļđāļāļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđ‚āļˆāļĄāļ•āļĩ https://www.techspot.com/news/108826-doge-wants-use-ai-tool-eliminate-half-all.html
    WWW.TECHSPOT.COM
    DOGE's AI tool misreads law, still tasked with deleting half of US regulations
    The Doge AI Deregulation Decision Tool will be analyzing around 200,000 federal regulations, according to the Washington Post, which cites documents it obtained and four government officials.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 144 Views 0 Reviews
  • https://youtube.com/shorts/4PpB0xJLAkk?si=GjDoGUkSXKgx2IU8
    https://youtube.com/shorts/4PpB0xJLAkk?si=GjDoGUkSXKgx2IU8
    0 Comments 0 Shares 47 Views 0 Reviews
  • "āļ­āļ āļīāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒ" āļĒāļąāļ™! āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļĨāļąāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāļ•āļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­ "āļŪāļļāļ™ āđ€āļ‹āļ™" āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡
    https://www.thai-tai.tv/news/20389/
    .
    #āļ­āļ āļīāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒ #āļ—āļąāļāļĐāļīāļ“ #āļŪāļļāļ™āđ€āļ‹āļ™ #āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāļąāļšāļĢāļēāļŠāļāļēāļĢ #āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ—āļĒ #āļ–āļ™āļ™āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļĨāļ‚68 #āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļĨāļąāļš #WATCHDOGCHANNEL

    "āļ­āļ āļīāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒ" āļĒāļąāļ™! āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļĨāļąāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāļ•āļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­ "āļŪāļļāļ™ āđ€āļ‹āļ™" āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ https://www.thai-tai.tv/news/20389/ . #āļ­āļ āļīāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒ #āļ—āļąāļāļĐāļīāļ“ #āļŪāļļāļ™āđ€āļ‹āļ™ #āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāļąāļšāļĢāļēāļŠāļāļēāļĢ #āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ—āļĒ #āļ–āļ™āļ™āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļĨāļ‚68 #āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļĨāļąāļš #WATCHDOGCHANNEL
    0 Comments 0 Shares 175 Views 0 Reviews
  • When To Use “I” Or “Me”

    Is it “my friends and I” or “my friends and me”? Both I and me are pronouns. But there’s a clear difference between the two: I is what is known as a subject pronoun, and me is an object pronoun.

    So what exactly does that mean?

    The difference between I and me
    The pronoun I can be used as the subject of a sentence, and me can only be used as the object of one. I can perform an action, while me can only have actions performed upon it.

    When to use I
    A subject pronoun can replace the noun (person, place, or thing) that’s performing the action (or verb) in any sentence. I is most often used as the subject of a verb. I can do things. You can say things like “I ran” or “I sneezed.” This rules applies when there is more than one noun as the subject. For example: Jennifer and I researched Isabel Allende for class. How do you know whether to use I or me here? First, ignore Jennifer and. Consider each pronoun individually. Is “I researched” or “me researched” correct? The answer is “I researched.” So I is the right pronoun to use in this case.

    Traditionally, the use of I is also appropriate when it follows a linking verb like is, was, or were. Linking verbs express a state of being rather than describing an action. They’re usually paired with subject pronouns. Technically, that means saying it is I is correct, but English speakers tend to use it is me informally as well.

    Examples of I in a sentence
    I fixed the remote control. (subject)
    My husband and I checked into the hotel. (subject)
    Could I speak to Vanessa? – It is I. (after a linking verb)

    When to use me
    An object pronoun may replace a sentence’s direct object, indirect object, or the object of the preposition. The object pronoun me is typically used as the direct or indirect object of a sentence. It receives the action of the verb or shows the result of the action. So you shouldn’t really say “Me ran.” You can say “My dog ran to me,” because in this case me is receiving the action of the dog running.

    As we’ve already noted, the use of me is also appropriate following a linking verb like is, was, or were.

    Examples of me in a sentence
    My grandfather bought me a book. (object)
    Give me the money. (object)
    Albert, is that you? – Yes, it’s me. (after a linking verb)

    ÂĐ 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    When To Use “I” Or “Me” Is it “my friends and I” or “my friends and me”? Both I and me are pronouns. But there’s a clear difference between the two: I is what is known as a subject pronoun, and me is an object pronoun. So what exactly does that mean? The difference between I and me The pronoun I can be used as the subject of a sentence, and me can only be used as the object of one. I can perform an action, while me can only have actions performed upon it. When to use I A subject pronoun can replace the noun (person, place, or thing) that’s performing the action (or verb) in any sentence. I is most often used as the subject of a verb. I can do things. You can say things like “I ran” or “I sneezed.” This rules applies when there is more than one noun as the subject. For example: Jennifer and I researched Isabel Allende for class. How do you know whether to use I or me here? First, ignore Jennifer and. Consider each pronoun individually. Is “I researched” or “me researched” correct? The answer is “I researched.” So I is the right pronoun to use in this case. Traditionally, the use of I is also appropriate when it follows a linking verb like is, was, or were. Linking verbs express a state of being rather than describing an action. They’re usually paired with subject pronouns. Technically, that means saying it is I is correct, but English speakers tend to use it is me informally as well. Examples of I in a sentence I fixed the remote control. (subject) My husband and I checked into the hotel. (subject) Could I speak to Vanessa? – It is I. (after a linking verb) When to use me An object pronoun may replace a sentence’s direct object, indirect object, or the object of the preposition. The object pronoun me is typically used as the direct or indirect object of a sentence. It receives the action of the verb or shows the result of the action. So you shouldn’t really say “Me ran.” You can say “My dog ran to me,” because in this case me is receiving the action of the dog running. As we’ve already noted, the use of me is also appropriate following a linking verb like is, was, or were. Examples of me in a sentence My grandfather bought me a book. (object) Give me the money. (object) Albert, is that you? – Yes, it’s me. (after a linking verb) © 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 335 Views 0 Reviews
  • https://youtube.com/shorts/xONgqe4nyZo?si=Iimfys4doGZNriTk
    https://youtube.com/shorts/xONgqe4nyZo?si=Iimfys4doGZNriTk
    0 Comments 0 Shares 57 Views 0 Reviews
  • “Your” vs. “You’re”: How To Choose The Right Word

    Did you know English is frequently cited as a very hard language to learn? Hmm, we wonder why?

    Well, its difficulty explains the mistakes we all make when speaking. But writing in English has its own unique set of challenges. One of the most common mistakes is telling you’re and your apart.

    They look similar, right? Even if they sound the same and look like fraternal twins, they serve two distinct and different purposes.

    When to use you’re

    Let’s take a look at you’re first.

    You’re is a contraction of the phrase you are. Easy enough to remember. Here’s how it looks in a few sentences:

    • You’re my best friend!
    • I think you’re the perfect match for the job.
    • Make sure you’re healthy.

    Any of these sentences would read the exact same way if you are replaced you’re.

    When to use your

    Your is a possessive adjective used to show ownership. It is not a contraction. Your is usually followed by a noun (including gerunds).

    Take these sentences, for example:

    • Your hair looks great today!
    • I wish I had your energy.
    • Has all your running around made you tired?

    If you added you are in the place of your in these sentences, they would not make sense.

    Why isn’t there an apostrophe for the possessive your?

    A big reason why people get these confused is the association of apostrophes with possession, such as:

    • That is George’s dog.
    • Susan’s cake won the baking competition.

    And that makes it easy to forget the differences between your and you’re when in the thick of writing. But don’t fret, there are ways to remember whether you need your or you’re.

    Tips

    Your first line of defense is to stop the mistake before it reaches the page. Identify which of the words has the apostrophe.

    Step 2: reread your writing and say “you are” instead of using the contraction. This editing tip will snuff out most misuse of the two words.

    Let’s test your new skills. Can you identify if your and you’re are used correctly in these sentences?

    • Your so talented at playing you’re piano.
    • It’s important you express your emotions.
    • Washing your clothes is necessary.

    Both your and you’re are incorrectly used in the first sentence; they should be switched. It should look like this instead: You’re so talented at playing your piano. In the second sentence, your is the correct word to use. The third sentence is correct. How did you do?

    Thankfully, once you understand the key differences, the correct use of these terms should be the least of your worries. You can move on to other more challenging and frequently mixed-up pairs, like affect vs. effect, complement vs. compliment, or even infamous vs. notorious!

    In no time, you’ll have conquered the English language.

    ÂĐ 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    “Your” vs. “You’re”: How To Choose The Right Word Did you know English is frequently cited as a very hard language to learn? Hmm, we wonder why? Well, its difficulty explains the mistakes we all make when speaking. But writing in English has its own unique set of challenges. One of the most common mistakes is telling you’re and your apart. They look similar, right? Even if they sound the same and look like fraternal twins, they serve two distinct and different purposes. When to use you’re Let’s take a look at you’re first. You’re is a contraction of the phrase you are. Easy enough to remember. Here’s how it looks in a few sentences: • You’re my best friend! • I think you’re the perfect match for the job. • Make sure you’re healthy. Any of these sentences would read the exact same way if you are replaced you’re. When to use your Your is a possessive adjective used to show ownership. It is not a contraction. Your is usually followed by a noun (including gerunds). Take these sentences, for example: • Your hair looks great today! • I wish I had your energy. • Has all your running around made you tired? If you added you are in the place of your in these sentences, they would not make sense. Why isn’t there an apostrophe for the possessive your? A big reason why people get these confused is the association of apostrophes with possession, such as: • That is George’s dog. • Susan’s cake won the baking competition. And that makes it easy to forget the differences between your and you’re when in the thick of writing. But don’t fret, there are ways to remember whether you need your or you’re. Tips Your first line of defense is to stop the mistake before it reaches the page. Identify which of the words has the apostrophe. Step 2: reread your writing and say “you are” instead of using the contraction. This editing tip will snuff out most misuse of the two words. Let’s test your new skills. Can you identify if your and you’re are used correctly in these sentences? • Your so talented at playing you’re piano. • It’s important you express your emotions. • Washing your clothes is necessary. Both your and you’re are incorrectly used in the first sentence; they should be switched. It should look like this instead: You’re so talented at playing your piano. In the second sentence, your is the correct word to use. The third sentence is correct. How did you do? Thankfully, once you understand the key differences, the correct use of these terms should be the least of your worries. You can move on to other more challenging and frequently mixed-up pairs, like affect vs. effect, complement vs. compliment, or even infamous vs. notorious! In no time, you’ll have conquered the English language. © 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 427 Views 0 Reviews
  • āļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒāļŸāļēāļ”āļ­āļĩāļĨāļ­āļ™ āļĄāļąāļŠāļāđŒāļ­āļĩāļāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡!

    “āļ­āļĩāļĨāļ­āļ™ āļĄāļąāļŠāļāđŒāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ”āļĩāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ‚āļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļœāļĄāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ§āđˆāļēāļœāļĄāļ„āļąāļ”āļ„āđ‰āļēāļ™āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ EV āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļąāļāļĄāļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĨāļ­āļ” āļĄāļąāļ™āđ„āļĢāđ‰āļŠāļēāļĢāļ° āļĢāļ–āļĒāļ™āļ•āđŒāđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļēāļāđ‡āļ”āļĩ āđāļ•āđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ„āļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ–āļđāļāļšāļąāļ‡āļ„āļąāļšāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­ āļ­āļĩāļĨāļ­āļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ­āļļāļ”āļŦāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāđƒāļ„āļĢāđ† āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ

    āļ–āđ‰āļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ­āļļāļ”āļŦāļ™āļļāļ™ āđ€āļ‚āļēāļ­āļēāļˆāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļīāļ”āļāļīāļˆāļāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ”āļīāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļĨāļąāļšāđāļ­āļŸāļĢāļīāļāļēāđƒāļ•āđ‰

    āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļˆāļĢāļ§āļ” āļ”āļēāļ§āđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļĄ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ EV āļ­āļĩāļāļ•āđˆāļ­āđ„āļ› āļšāļēāļ‡āļ—āļĩ DOGE āļ„āļ§āļĢāļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēā
    āļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒāļŸāļēāļ”āļ­āļĩāļĨāļ­āļ™ āļĄāļąāļŠāļāđŒāļ­āļĩāļāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡! “āļ­āļĩāļĨāļ­āļ™ āļĄāļąāļŠāļāđŒāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ”āļĩāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ‚āļēāļˆāļ°āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļœāļĄāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ§āđˆāļēāļœāļĄāļ„āļąāļ”āļ„āđ‰āļēāļ™āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ EV āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļąāļāļĄāļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĨāļ­āļ” āļĄāļąāļ™āđ„āļĢāđ‰āļŠāļēāļĢāļ° āļĢāļ–āļĒāļ™āļ•āđŒāđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļēāļāđ‡āļ”āļĩ āđāļ•āđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ„āļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ–āļđāļāļšāļąāļ‡āļ„āļąāļšāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­ āļ­āļĩāļĨāļ­āļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ­āļļāļ”āļŦāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāđƒāļ„āļĢāđ† āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ āļ–āđ‰āļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ­āļļāļ”āļŦāļ™āļļāļ™ āđ€āļ‚āļēāļ­āļēāļˆāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļīāļ”āļāļīāļˆāļāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ”āļīāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļĨāļąāļšāđāļ­āļŸāļĢāļīāļāļēāđƒāļ•āđ‰ āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļˆāļĢāļ§āļ” āļ”āļēāļ§āđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļĄ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ EV āļ­āļĩāļāļ•āđˆāļ­āđ„āļ› āļšāļēāļ‡āļ—āļĩ DOGE āļ„āļ§āļĢāļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēā
    0 Comments 0 Shares 242 Views 0 Reviews
  • āļ–āđ‰āļēāļ„āļļāļ“āļ„āļīāļ”āļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļ„āļ·āļ­āđāļ„āđˆāđ€āļ—āļĢāļ™āļ”āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™... FATF āļ­āļĒāļēāļāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļēāļ„āļīāļ”āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļēāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ§āđˆāļē āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŸāļ­āļāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™, āļāļēāļĢāļŦāļĨāļ­āļāļĨāļ§āļ‡, āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļ­āļēāļŠāļāļēāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļī

    āļˆāļēāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāļļāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ FATF āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē:
    - āļĄāļĩāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļāļāļīāļˆāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļœāļīāļ”āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļŠāļđāļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡ $51,000 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩ 2024
    - āđāļ•āđˆāļˆāļēāļ 138 āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ—āļĩāđˆ FATF āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļš āļĄāļĩāđāļ„āđˆ 40 āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ„āļ§āļšāļ„āļļāļĄāļ•āļēāļĄāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™
    - āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢ “āļŦāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ” āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒ — āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļžāļĢāļĄāđāļ”āļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āļĄāļēāļ

    āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļ„āđˆāđƒāļ™āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļŠāļ–āļīāļ•āļī āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ° FATF āļĒāļąāļ‡āđ€āļ•āļ·āļ­āļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āļžāļ§āļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰ stablecoin (āđ€āļŦāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļđāļāļāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡) āļāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļĨāđ„āļāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļœāļīāļ”āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āđ€āļāļēāļŦāļĨāļĩāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­, āļœāļđāđ‰āļāđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļĢāđ‰āļēāļĒ, āđāļĨāļ°āļ‚āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļēāļĒāļēāđ€āļŠāļžāļ•āļīāļ”

    āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāļļāļ”āļ„āļ·āļ­ FBI āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āđ€āļāļēāļŦāļĨāļĩāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļĄāļđāļĨāļ„āđˆāļēāļāļ§āđˆāļē $1.5 āļžāļąāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļˆāļēāļ ByBit āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāļļāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒ — āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ‚āļˆāļĢāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•

    https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2025/06/26/global-financial-crime-watchdog-calls-for-action-on-crypto-risks
    āļ–āđ‰āļēāļ„āļļāļ“āļ„āļīāļ”āļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļ„āļ·āļ­āđāļ„āđˆāđ€āļ—āļĢāļ™āļ”āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™... FATF āļ­āļĒāļēāļāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļēāļ„āļīāļ”āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļēāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ§āđˆāļē āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŸāļ­āļāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™, āļāļēāļĢāļŦāļĨāļ­āļāļĨāļ§āļ‡, āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļ­āļēāļŠāļāļēāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļī āļˆāļēāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāļļāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ FATF āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē: - āļĄāļĩāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļāļāļīāļˆāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļœāļīāļ”āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļŠāļđāļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡ $51,000 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩ 2024 - āđāļ•āđˆāļˆāļēāļ 138 āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ—āļĩāđˆ FATF āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļš āļĄāļĩāđāļ„āđˆ 40 āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ„āļ§āļšāļ„āļļāļĄāļ•āļēāļĄāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™ - āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢ “āļŦāļĨāļšāļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ” āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒ — āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āđ€āļ„āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļžāļĢāļĄāđāļ”āļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āļĄāļēāļ āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļ„āđˆāđƒāļ™āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļŠāļ–āļīāļ•āļī āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ° FATF āļĒāļąāļ‡āđ€āļ•āļ·āļ­āļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āļžāļ§āļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰ stablecoin (āđ€āļŦāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļđāļāļāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡) āļāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļĨāđ„āļāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļœāļīāļ”āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āđ€āļāļēāļŦāļĨāļĩāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­, āļœāļđāđ‰āļāđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļĢāđ‰āļēāļĒ, āđāļĨāļ°āļ‚āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļēāļĒāļēāđ€āļŠāļžāļ•āļīāļ” āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāļļāļ”āļ„āļ·āļ­ FBI āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āđ€āļāļēāļŦāļĨāļĩāđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ•āļĄāļđāļĨāļ„āđˆāļēāļāļ§āđˆāļē $1.5 āļžāļąāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļˆāļēāļ ByBit āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāļļāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒ — āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ‚āļˆāļĢāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ•āļīāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ„āļĢāļīāļ›āđ‚āļ• https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2025/06/26/global-financial-crime-watchdog-calls-for-action-on-crypto-risks
    WWW.THESTAR.COM.MY
    Global financial crime watchdog calls for action on crypto risks
    PARIS (Reuters) -The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global financial crime watchdog, on Thursday called on countries to take stronger action to combat illicit finance in crypto assets, warning that gaps in regulation could have global repercussions.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 353 Views 0 Reviews
  • Sir Hun, if you change your mind will call a doggy. Disclose it surgely.
    Sir Hun, if you change your mind will call a doggy. Disclose it surgely.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 82 Views 0 Reviews
  • Common Grammar Mistakes You May Be Making

    It’s no secret that English is a tough and pretty weird language to learn. There are so many grammar rules and exceptions that even the best of us make mistakes every now and then. However, some grammar mistakes are more common than others. In fact, you might be making some simple grammar mistakes without even knowing it. To do our part in helping everybody become a grammar great, we’ve put together a list that will help solve some of the most common grammar mistakes out there. Keep this list handy before you turn in your next paper or hit send on that important email to be the boss!

    Mistake 1: who or whom?
    Let’s start with a biggie: who and whom are a pair of commonly confused pronouns that are often used to ask questions or refer to unknown people. In short, who is a subject pronoun while whom is an object pronoun. This means that you would use who as you would use I, he, she, and they, and you would use whom in the same places as me, him, them, and us. For example:

    Who (subject) ate my lunch?
    You went to the beach with whom (object)?
    But interrogative sentences often jumble word order around, and many writers hesitate to place the object whom at the beginning of the sentence. Although correct, it just seems odd. For example:

    Whom (object) did you (subject) ask questions to?
    All of that said, in informal speech and writing, speakers will often opt for who where whom has traditionally been used. To learn much more about the differences between who and whom, check out our guide When Do You Use “Who” vs. “Whom”?

    Mistake 2: who or that?
    Who is back again to confuse us. Who and that are another pair of pronouns that can be easily mixed up. Generally speaking, who is used to refer to people (and possibly named animals) and that is used to refer to non-living things (and possibly unnamed animals). For example:

    Who lives here? (refers to a person or people)
    I never want to see that again. (refers to a thing or unnamed animal)
    Both who and that can also be used as relative pronouns to introduce relative clauses that describe nouns. As before, who is typically used to refer to people while that is used to refer to objects.

    I sat by the girl (person) who was wearing a hat.
    Kelly bought a car (object) that has good gas mileage.
    That being said, that is often used to describe people in informal writing. For example:

    He just met the girl that moved in next door.
    Most style guides recommend avoiding using that in this way in formal writing.

    Mistake 3: commas—all the commas
    We move from the apostrophe to possibly the most dreaded punctuation mark of all: the comma. It is hard to know where to even begin with commas, as they are the source of many, many grammar errors. To really master commas, you are best off checking out our amazing guide to proper comma usage. For now, we’ll just look at a couple of common comma mistakes to avoid:

    Common comma mistake: the splice
    This mistake occurs when a comma appears where it shouldn’t. When joining two independent clauses, a comma needs to be followed by a conjunction. But using a comma by itself (as in the first sentence below) is considered an error.

    Mistake: I like strawberry ice cream, my sister doesn’t.
    Fixed: I like strawberry ice cream, but my sister doesn’t.

    Common comma mistake: tricky subordinate clauses
    Subordinate clauses do not require a comma, and it is considered a mistake to use one.

    Mistake: Luke avoids cats, because he is allergic to them.
    Fixed: Luke avoids cats because he is allergic to them.

    Subordinate clauses begin with subordinating conjunctions, such as because, after, before, since, or although.

    Mistake 4: its or it’s?
    Only a single apostrophe separates the frustrating duo if its and it’s. The word its is a possessive pronoun that is used like the words my, his, her, and our. The word it’s is a contraction for the phrase “it is” or “it has.” Despite how similar they look, its and it’s have completely different meanings and usage. For example:

    The door fell off its (possessive) hinges.
    The idea is really bad but it’s (“it is”) the only one we have.
    This common mistake likely has to do with the fact that an apostrophe is used to form the possessive of nouns such as Dave’s or Canada’s. As weird as it looks, its is in fact a possessive despite not using an apostrophe.

    If you are still a little lost, our thorough guide to its and it’s can provide more assistance in separating these two very similar words.

    Mistake 5: their, there, and they’re? (And what about your or you’re?)
    Their, there, and they’re are a trio of homophones that frequently get mistaken for one another. However, they all have different, unique meanings. Let’s look at each one.

    Their is the possessive form of they, and it can be used in place of either the singular or plural they to express ownership or possession. For example:

    The scientists put on their lab coats.
    They’re is a contraction of they are and fills in for it to shorten sentences. For example:

    Becky and Jayden were supposed to be here already, but they’re (“they are”) late.
    There is a word that usually means “that place” as in Tokyo looks so exciting; I wish I could go there. It has a few other meanings, but it isn’t a synonym of either their or they’re.

    Your and you’re are another pair of homophones that commonly get mixed up. Like their, your is the possessive form of the singular and plural you. Like they’re, you’re is a contraction that stands for “you are.” Here are examples of how we use these two similar words:

    I like your jacket. (possession)
    You’re (“you are”) smarter than you think.

    Mistake 6: me or I?
    At first glance, me and I seem simple enough: I is a subject pronoun and me is an object pronoun. We use I as the subject of sentences/clauses and me as the object. For example:

    I (subject) went to sleep.
    Erica likes me (object).
    However, it can be easy to forget these rules when sentences get more complicated, and it gets harder to figure out if something is a subject or object.

    Chris, Daniela, and I (compound subject) played soccer.
    Dad sent birthday presents to my sister and me (compound object).
    The main source of this confusion might be the word than, which can be used as either a conjunction or a preposition. Because of this, both of the following sentences are correct:

    Nobody sings karaoke better than I.
    Nobody sings karaoke better than me.

    Mistake 7: dangling modifiers
    When we use modifiers such as adverbial or participial phrases, we typically want to place them as close to the word they modify as possible. Otherwise, a sentence may end up with a type of mistake called a “dangling modifier.” A dangling modifier is a phrase or clause that either appears to modify the wrong things or seems to modify nothing at all. This common grammar mistake can result in confusing or unintentionally funny sentences. To fix these misplaced modifiers, you’ll want to place them close to the word they modify and make it clear which word or part of the sentence they modify. For example:

    Mistake: While driving, a bear walked in front of my car. (Is a bear driving something?)
    Fixed: While I was driving my car, a bear walked in front of me.

    Mistake: Rubbing their hands together, the winter weather was harsh and cold. (Whoever is rubbing their hands is missing.)
    Fixed: Rubbing their hands together, the explorers tried to stay warm in the harsh and cold winter weather.

    Mistake: Yesterday, I found a stray dog in my underpants. (Was the dog hiding inside your underpants?)
    Fixed: While wearing just my underpants, I found a stray dog yesterday.

    Mistake 8: pronoun antecedents
    When we use pronouns, they must agree in number with their antecedents. The antecedent is the noun that a pronoun is filling in for. It is a mistake to use a plural pronoun with a singular antecedent and a singular pronoun with a plural antecedent. For example:

    Mistake: The bees hid in its hive.
    Fixed: The bees hid in their hive.

    Additionally, we wouldn’t use its to refer to a person, nor would we use personal pronouns to refer to non-living things.

    Mistake: The zoo that Amanda owns is having her grand opening tomorrow.
    Fixed: The zoo that Amanda owns is having its grand opening tomorrow.

    At the same time, it should be clear in a sentence what a pronoun’s antecedent actually is. Avoid making the mistake of having missing or unclear antecedents.

    Missing antecedent: I looked everywhere but couldn’t find her. (Who is her?)
    Unclear antecedent: The toaster was next to the sink when it broke. (What broke? Does “it” refer to the toaster or the sink?)

    To learn a lot more about pronouns and how to use them, check out our great guide to pronouns here.

    Mistake 9: semicolons
    For many, the semicolon is not a punctuation mark that sees a lot of use, which may explain why people make mistakes when trying to use it. As it turns out, semicolons are fairly simple to use. The main thing to remember when using a semicolon is that the sentence following the semicolon doesn’t begin with a capital letter unless it begins with a proper noun. For example:

    I love cats; they are cute and smart.
    Jack and Jill went up a hill; Jill made it up first.

    ÂĐ 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    Common Grammar Mistakes You May Be Making It’s no secret that English is a tough and pretty weird language to learn. There are so many grammar rules and exceptions that even the best of us make mistakes every now and then. However, some grammar mistakes are more common than others. In fact, you might be making some simple grammar mistakes without even knowing it. To do our part in helping everybody become a grammar great, we’ve put together a list that will help solve some of the most common grammar mistakes out there. Keep this list handy before you turn in your next paper or hit send on that important email to be the boss! Mistake 1: who or whom? Let’s start with a biggie: who and whom are a pair of commonly confused pronouns that are often used to ask questions or refer to unknown people. In short, who is a subject pronoun while whom is an object pronoun. This means that you would use who as you would use I, he, she, and they, and you would use whom in the same places as me, him, them, and us. For example: Who (subject) ate my lunch? You went to the beach with whom (object)? But interrogative sentences often jumble word order around, and many writers hesitate to place the object whom at the beginning of the sentence. Although correct, it just seems odd. For example: Whom (object) did you (subject) ask questions to? All of that said, in informal speech and writing, speakers will often opt for who where whom has traditionally been used. To learn much more about the differences between who and whom, check out our guide When Do You Use “Who” vs. “Whom”? Mistake 2: who or that? Who is back again to confuse us. Who and that are another pair of pronouns that can be easily mixed up. Generally speaking, who is used to refer to people (and possibly named animals) and that is used to refer to non-living things (and possibly unnamed animals). For example: Who lives here? (refers to a person or people) I never want to see that again. (refers to a thing or unnamed animal) Both who and that can also be used as relative pronouns to introduce relative clauses that describe nouns. As before, who is typically used to refer to people while that is used to refer to objects. I sat by the girl (person) who was wearing a hat. Kelly bought a car (object) that has good gas mileage. That being said, that is often used to describe people in informal writing. For example: He just met the girl that moved in next door. Most style guides recommend avoiding using that in this way in formal writing. Mistake 3: commas—all the commas We move from the apostrophe to possibly the most dreaded punctuation mark of all: the comma. It is hard to know where to even begin with commas, as they are the source of many, many grammar errors. To really master commas, you are best off checking out our amazing guide to proper comma usage. For now, we’ll just look at a couple of common comma mistakes to avoid: Common comma mistake: the splice This mistake occurs when a comma appears where it shouldn’t. When joining two independent clauses, a comma needs to be followed by a conjunction. But using a comma by itself (as in the first sentence below) is considered an error. ❌ Mistake: I like strawberry ice cream, my sister doesn’t. ✅ Fixed: I like strawberry ice cream, but my sister doesn’t. Common comma mistake: tricky subordinate clauses Subordinate clauses do not require a comma, and it is considered a mistake to use one. ❌ Mistake: Luke avoids cats, because he is allergic to them. ✅ Fixed: Luke avoids cats because he is allergic to them. Subordinate clauses begin with subordinating conjunctions, such as because, after, before, since, or although. Mistake 4: its or it’s? Only a single apostrophe separates the frustrating duo if its and it’s. The word its is a possessive pronoun that is used like the words my, his, her, and our. The word it’s is a contraction for the phrase “it is” or “it has.” Despite how similar they look, its and it’s have completely different meanings and usage. For example: The door fell off its (possessive) hinges. The idea is really bad but it’s (“it is”) the only one we have. This common mistake likely has to do with the fact that an apostrophe is used to form the possessive of nouns such as Dave’s or Canada’s. As weird as it looks, its is in fact a possessive despite not using an apostrophe. If you are still a little lost, our thorough guide to its and it’s can provide more assistance in separating these two very similar words. Mistake 5: their, there, and they’re? (And what about your or you’re?) Their, there, and they’re are a trio of homophones that frequently get mistaken for one another. However, they all have different, unique meanings. Let’s look at each one. Their is the possessive form of they, and it can be used in place of either the singular or plural they to express ownership or possession. For example: The scientists put on their lab coats. They’re is a contraction of they are and fills in for it to shorten sentences. For example: Becky and Jayden were supposed to be here already, but they’re (“they are”) late. There is a word that usually means “that place” as in Tokyo looks so exciting; I wish I could go there. It has a few other meanings, but it isn’t a synonym of either their or they’re. Your and you’re are another pair of homophones that commonly get mixed up. Like their, your is the possessive form of the singular and plural you. Like they’re, you’re is a contraction that stands for “you are.” Here are examples of how we use these two similar words: I like your jacket. (possession) You’re (“you are”) smarter than you think. Mistake 6: me or I? At first glance, me and I seem simple enough: I is a subject pronoun and me is an object pronoun. We use I as the subject of sentences/clauses and me as the object. For example: I (subject) went to sleep. Erica likes me (object). However, it can be easy to forget these rules when sentences get more complicated, and it gets harder to figure out if something is a subject or object. Chris, Daniela, and I (compound subject) played soccer. Dad sent birthday presents to my sister and me (compound object). The main source of this confusion might be the word than, which can be used as either a conjunction or a preposition. Because of this, both of the following sentences are correct: Nobody sings karaoke better than I. Nobody sings karaoke better than me. Mistake 7: dangling modifiers When we use modifiers such as adverbial or participial phrases, we typically want to place them as close to the word they modify as possible. Otherwise, a sentence may end up with a type of mistake called a “dangling modifier.” A dangling modifier is a phrase or clause that either appears to modify the wrong things or seems to modify nothing at all. This common grammar mistake can result in confusing or unintentionally funny sentences. To fix these misplaced modifiers, you’ll want to place them close to the word they modify and make it clear which word or part of the sentence they modify. For example: ❌ Mistake: While driving, a bear walked in front of my car. (Is a bear driving something?) ✅ Fixed: While I was driving my car, a bear walked in front of me. ❌ Mistake: Rubbing their hands together, the winter weather was harsh and cold. (Whoever is rubbing their hands is missing.) ✅ Fixed: Rubbing their hands together, the explorers tried to stay warm in the harsh and cold winter weather. ❌ Mistake: Yesterday, I found a stray dog in my underpants. (Was the dog hiding inside your underpants?) ✅ Fixed: While wearing just my underpants, I found a stray dog yesterday. Mistake 8: pronoun antecedents When we use pronouns, they must agree in number with their antecedents. The antecedent is the noun that a pronoun is filling in for. It is a mistake to use a plural pronoun with a singular antecedent and a singular pronoun with a plural antecedent. For example: ❌ Mistake: The bees hid in its hive. ✅ Fixed: The bees hid in their hive. Additionally, we wouldn’t use its to refer to a person, nor would we use personal pronouns to refer to non-living things. ❌ Mistake: The zoo that Amanda owns is having her grand opening tomorrow. ✅ Fixed: The zoo that Amanda owns is having its grand opening tomorrow. At the same time, it should be clear in a sentence what a pronoun’s antecedent actually is. Avoid making the mistake of having missing or unclear antecedents. Missing antecedent: I looked everywhere but couldn’t find her. (Who is her?) Unclear antecedent: The toaster was next to the sink when it broke. (What broke? Does “it” refer to the toaster or the sink?) To learn a lot more about pronouns and how to use them, check out our great guide to pronouns here. Mistake 9: semicolons For many, the semicolon is not a punctuation mark that sees a lot of use, which may explain why people make mistakes when trying to use it. As it turns out, semicolons are fairly simple to use. The main thing to remember when using a semicolon is that the sentence following the semicolon doesn’t begin with a capital letter unless it begins with a proper noun. For example: I love cats; they are cute and smart. Jack and Jill went up a hill; Jill made it up first. © 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 666 Views 0 Reviews
  • āļœāļĨāļ‡āļēāļ™AIāļ—āļģāđ€āļžāļĨāļ‡āļŦāļĄāļēDebut SingleāļŠāļēāļ§āļ™āđ‰āļ­āļĒāļ­āļēāļĢāļēāđ€āļĨāđˆ #āļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡āđāļŠāļ™āļĢāļąāļ #āļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ‚āļĨāļāļ™āđˆāļēāļĢāļąāļ #āļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡ #āļ™āđˆāļēāļĢāļąāļ #āļ„āļ™āļĢāļąāļāļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒ #āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ #āļšāļēāļ‡āđāļāđ‰āļ§ #āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ­āļēāļ™ #āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚ #āļŦāļĄāļē #dog #pets #animal #funny #āļ­āļēāļĢāļēāđ€āļĨāđˆāļŦāļĄāļēāļ”āļ·āđ‰āļ­
    âĢïļāļœāļĨāļ‡āļēāļ™AIāļ—āļģāđ€āļžāļĨāļ‡āļŦāļĄāļē😁ðŸŽĩDebut Single🐚āļŠāļēāļ§āļ™āđ‰āļ­āļĒāļ­āļēāļĢāļēāđ€āļĨāđˆâĢïļðŸĪĢðŸĨ°ðŸ˜˜ #āļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡āđāļŠāļ™āļĢāļąāļ #āļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ‚āļĨāļāļ™āđˆāļēāļĢāļąāļ #āļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡ #āļ™āđˆāļēāļĢāļąāļ #āļ„āļ™āļĢāļąāļāļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒ #āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ #āļšāļēāļ‡āđāļāđ‰āļ§ #āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ­āļēāļ™ #āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚ #āļŦāļĄāļē #dog #pets #animal #funny #āļ­āļēāļĢāļēāđ€āļĨāđˆāļŦāļĄāļēāļ”āļ·āđ‰āļ­
    0 Comments 0 Shares 320 Views 7 0 Reviews
  • āļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰ Microsoft āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆāļˆāļ°āļœāļĨāļąāļāļ”āļąāļ™ “Copilot” āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ­āļąāļˆāļ‰āļĢāļīāļĒāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āđāļĨāļ°āđƒāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢ āļžāļ­āđ„āļ›āļ”āļđāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāđ€āļ§āđ‡āļšāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļāđ‡āļˆāļ°āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļē Copilot āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļĢāļļāļ›āđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļē āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢ āđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļēāļ‡āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāđ„āļĨāļ”āđŒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ—āļąāļ™āđƒāļˆ

    āđāļ•āđˆāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§ āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™ NAD (National Advertising Division) āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļāđ‡āļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļē “āļ•āļąāļāđ€āļ•āļ·āļ­āļ™” Microsoft āļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āđƒāļ™āļˆāļļāļ”āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļšāļēāļ‡āļˆāļļāļ” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē “Copilot” āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļ™āđ€āļ§āļ­āļĢāđŒāļŠāļąāļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļ™āđāļ­āļ›āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļāļąāļš Business Chat āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āđ† āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļžāļ­āļŠāļĄāļ„āļ§āļĢ

    Business Chat āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āđˆāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰ āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ„āļĨāļīāļāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļ„āļļāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļĨāļĒāđāļšāļš Copilot āđƒāļ™ Word āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ PowerPoint āđāļ•āđˆāđƒāļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļāļĨāļąāļšāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļŦāļĨāđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™

    NAD āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļĩāđ‰āļ§āđˆāļē Microsoft āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē Copilot “āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ° ROI” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ “āļ™āđˆāļēāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļ·āļ­āļžāļ­” āļ–āļķāļ‡āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļīāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļēāļŠāļ­āļēāļ“āļēāļˆāļąāļāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ§āđˆāļēāļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ‰āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒ 26 āļ™āļēāļ—āļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ§āļąāļ™āļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ

    āļŠāļļāļ”āļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒ Microsoft āļ•āļ­āļšāļāļĨāļąāļšāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ­āļēāļŠāļĩāļžāļ§āđˆāļē āļ–āļķāļ‡āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļāļąāļšāļšāļēāļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļ­ āđāļ•āđˆāļāđ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļšāļēāļ‡āļˆāļļāļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļŠāļ­āļ”āļ„āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļ„āļģāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ NAD āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§

    Microsoft āļ–āļđāļ NAD āļ§āļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļē Copilot āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāđ‚āļ āļ„āļŠāļąāļšāļŠāļ™  
    • āđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļē Copilot āđ„āļĄāđˆāđāļĒāļāđāļĒāļ°āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡ Copilot āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļāļąāļš Business Chat  
    • Business Chat āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļē āđāļ•āđˆāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļāļĨāļąāļšāđ„āļĄāđˆāļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļˆāļļāļ”āļ™āļĩāđ‰

    NAD āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļœāļĨāļĨāļąāļžāļ˜āđŒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄ  
    • Microsoft āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļē Copilot āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄ productivity āđāļĨāļ° ROI āđāļ•āđˆ NAD āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļžāļ­  
    • āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™ UK āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āđ€āļ§āļĨāļē 26 āļ™āļēāļ—āļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ§āļąāļ™

    Microsoft āļ•āļ­āļšāļĢāļąāļšāļ„āļģāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļšāļēāļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™  
    • āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļĄāļ·āļ­āđāļĄāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ—āļļāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™

    āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē “Copilot” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāđāļĒāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ āļ— āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļŠāļąāļšāļŠāļ™  
    • āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļ­āļēāļˆāļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰ Business Chat āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļš Copilot āđƒāļ™āđāļ­āļ›āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ†  
    • āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļœāļīāļ”āļ­āļēāļˆāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡

    āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž āļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļāļīāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āļ–āđ‰āļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠ  
    • āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē “āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄ ROI” āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļīāļ‡āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ”āļ„āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡  
    • āļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļēāļ” transparency āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļē

    āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ§āđˆāļē Copilot āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ§āļ­āļĢāđŒāļŠāļąāļ™āļĄāļĩāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™  
    • āļ„āļ§āļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŸāļĩāđ€āļˆāļ­āļĢāđŒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Copilot āđƒāļ™āđāļ­āļ›āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄ

    https://www.neowin.net/news/watchdog-finds-microsoft-guilty-of-confusing-advertising-when-it-comes-to-copilot/
    āļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰ Microsoft āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆāļˆāļ°āļœāļĨāļąāļāļ”āļąāļ™ “Copilot” āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ­āļąāļˆāļ‰āļĢāļīāļĒāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āđāļĨāļ°āđƒāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢ āļžāļ­āđ„āļ›āļ”āļđāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāđ€āļ§āđ‡āļšāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļāđ‡āļˆāļ°āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļē Copilot āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļĢāļļāļ›āđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļē āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢ āđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļēāļ‡āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāđ„āļĨāļ”āđŒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ—āļąāļ™āđƒāļˆ āđāļ•āđˆāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§ āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™ NAD (National Advertising Division) āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļāđ‡āļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļē “āļ•āļąāļāđ€āļ•āļ·āļ­āļ™” Microsoft āļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āđƒāļ™āļˆāļļāļ”āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļšāļēāļ‡āļˆāļļāļ” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē “Copilot” āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļ™āđ€āļ§āļ­āļĢāđŒāļŠāļąāļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļ™āđāļ­āļ›āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļāļąāļš Business Chat āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āđ† āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļžāļ­āļŠāļĄāļ„āļ§āļĢ Business Chat āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āđˆāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰ āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ„āļĨāļīāļāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļ„āļļāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļĨāļĒāđāļšāļš Copilot āđƒāļ™ Word āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ PowerPoint āđāļ•āđˆāđƒāļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļāļĨāļąāļšāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļŦāļĨāđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™ NAD āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļĩāđ‰āļ§āđˆāļē Microsoft āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē Copilot “āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ° ROI” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ “āļ™āđˆāļēāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļ·āļ­āļžāļ­” āļ–āļķāļ‡āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļīāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļēāļŠāļ­āļēāļ“āļēāļˆāļąāļāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ§āđˆāļēāļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ‰āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒ 26 āļ™āļēāļ—āļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ§āļąāļ™āļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ āļŠāļļāļ”āļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒ Microsoft āļ•āļ­āļšāļāļĨāļąāļšāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ­āļēāļŠāļĩāļžāļ§āđˆāļē āļ–āļķāļ‡āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļāļąāļšāļšāļēāļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļ­ āđāļ•āđˆāļāđ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļšāļēāļ‡āļˆāļļāļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļŠāļ­āļ”āļ„āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļ„āļģāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ NAD āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§ âœ… Microsoft āļ–āļđāļ NAD āļ§āļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļē Copilot āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāđ‚āļ āļ„āļŠāļąāļšāļŠāļ™   • āđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļē Copilot āđ„āļĄāđˆāđāļĒāļāđāļĒāļ°āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡ Copilot āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļāļąāļš Business Chat   • Business Chat āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļē āđāļ•āđˆāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļāļĨāļąāļšāđ„āļĄāđˆāļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļˆāļļāļ”āļ™āļĩāđ‰ ✅ NAD āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļœāļĨāļĨāļąāļžāļ˜āđŒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄ   • Microsoft āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļē Copilot āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄ productivity āđāļĨāļ° ROI āđāļ•āđˆ NAD āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļžāļ­   • āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™ UK āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŦāļĒāļąāļ”āđ€āļ§āļĨāļē 26 āļ™āļēāļ—āļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ§āļąāļ™ âœ… Microsoft āļ•āļ­āļšāļĢāļąāļšāļ„āļģāđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļšāļēāļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™   • āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļĄāļ·āļ­āđāļĄāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ—āļļāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™ â€žïļ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē “Copilot” āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāđāļĒāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ āļ— āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļŠāļąāļšāļŠāļ™   • āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļ­āļēāļˆāļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰ Business Chat āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļš Copilot āđƒāļ™āđāļ­āļ›āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ†   • āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļœāļīāļ”āļ­āļēāļˆāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ â€žïļ āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ†āļĐāļ“āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž āļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļāļīāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āļ–āđ‰āļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠ   • āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē “āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄ ROI” āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļīāļ‡āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ”āļ„āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡   • āļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļēāļ” transparency āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļē ‾ïļ āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ§āđˆāļē Copilot āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ§āļ­āļĢāđŒāļŠāļąāļ™āļĄāļĩāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™   • āļ„āļ§āļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŸāļĩāđ€āļˆāļ­āļĢāđŒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Copilot āđƒāļ™āđāļ­āļ›āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄ https://www.neowin.net/news/watchdog-finds-microsoft-guilty-of-confusing-advertising-when-it-comes-to-copilot/
    WWW.NEOWIN.NET
    Watchdog finds Microsoft guilty of confusing advertising when it comes to Copilot
    A U.S. watchdog has criticized Microsoft for making statements about Copilot that are not a "good fit" for making objective claims regarding increased productivity.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 268 Views 0 Reviews
  • āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ (Siberian Husky) āļĄāļĩāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āđˆāļēāļŠāļ™āđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļāđˆāļēāđāļāđˆāļĄāļēāļ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļēāļĒāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļļāđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļ āļŠāļ™āđ€āļœāđˆāļēāļŠāļļāļ„āļŠāļĩ (Chukchi) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āđāļ–āļšāļ•āļ°āļ§āļąāļ™āļ­āļ­āļāđ„āļāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒ āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļĢāļąāļŠāđ€āļ‹āļĩāļĒ

    āļˆāļļāļ”āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”:
    âžĪ āļ āļđāļĄāļīāļ āļēāļ„āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ•āļ°āļ§āļąāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ (āđ€āļ‚āļ•āļ­āļēāļāļēāļĻāļŦāļ™āļēāļ§āļˆāļąāļ”)
    âžĪ āļŠāļēāļ§āļŠāļļāļ„āļŠāļĩāđ€āļžāļēāļ°āļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļļāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļĨāļēāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđƒāļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļŦāļīāļĄāļ°
    âžĪ āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŦāļĄāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ āļ­āļķāļ” āļ–āļķāļ āļ—āļ™ āļ§āļīāđˆāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ„āļāļĨ āļāļīāļ™āļ™āđ‰āļ­āļĒ āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļ™āļīāļŠāļąāļĒ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĄāļīāļ•āļĢāļāļąāļšāļ„āļ™

    āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āđ€āļ”āđˆāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđƒāļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļ­āļēāļāļēāļĻāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒ
    * āļ‚āļ™āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™ āļŦāļ™āļēāđāļ™āđˆāļ™ āļ—āļ™āļŦāļ™āļēāļ§āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļĩ
    * āļŦāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļžāļ§āļ‡ āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļīāļ”āļˆāļĄāļđāļāļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™āļ­āļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļļāđˆāļ™
    * āļ”āļ§āļ‡āļ•āļēāļŠāļĩāļŸāđ‰āļēāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĩ āļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ”āļ”āđ€āļ”āđˆāļ™
    * āļ‚āļ™āļēāļ”āļāļ°āļ—āļąāļ”āļĢāļąāļ” āđāļ‚āđ‡āļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡ āļ„āļĨāđˆāļ­āļ‡āđāļ„āļĨāđˆāļ§
    * āļ™āļīāļŠāļąāļĒāļ‚āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™ āļĢāļąāļāļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ° āļŠāļ­āļšāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļđāļ‡

    āļŦāļĄāļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļļāđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļđāđ‰āļˆāļąāļāļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĨāļāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļ—āļĩāđˆ 20
    āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļˆāļēāļāļ•āļģāļ™āļēāļ™ "āļšāļąāļĨāđ‚āļ• (Balto)" āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļēāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļ§āļąāļ„āļ‹āļĩāļ™āļāđˆāļēāļŦāļīāļĄāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ āđ† āđƒāļ™āļ­āļĨāļēāļŠāļāļē āļ›āļĩ 1925

    #āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ #āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ #āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹ #āļŦāļĄāļēāļĨāļēāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™ #āļ•āļģāļ™āļēāļ™āļšāļąāļĨāđ‚āļ• #ChukchiDogs #āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļ–āļīāđˆāļ™ #āļŦāļĄāļēāļŠāļēāļĒāļŦāļ™āļēāļ§


    LINE ID: @etravelway 78s.me/d0c307
    Facebook: etravelway 78s.me/8a4061
    Twitter: @eTravelWay 78s.me/e603f5
    Tiktok : https://78s.me/543eb9
    : etravelway 78s.me/05e8da
    : 0 2116 6395

    #āđāļžāđ‡āļ„āđ€āļāļˆāļ—āļąāļ§āļĢāđŒ #āļˆāļąāļ”āļāļĢāļļāđŠāļ›āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§ #eTravelway
    🐚 āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ (Siberian Husky) āļĄāļĩāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āđˆāļēāļŠāļ™āđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļāđˆāļēāđāļāđˆāļĄāļēāļ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļēāļĒāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļļāđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļ āļŠāļ™āđ€āļœāđˆāļēāļŠāļļāļ„āļŠāļĩ (Chukchi) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āđāļ–āļšāļ•āļ°āļ§āļąāļ™āļ­āļ­āļāđ„āļāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒ āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļĢāļąāļŠāđ€āļ‹āļĩāļĒ ðŸ‡·ðŸ‡š 📌 āļˆāļļāļ”āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”: âžĪ āļ āļđāļĄāļīāļ āļēāļ„āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ•āļ°āļ§āļąāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ (āđ€āļ‚āļ•āļ­āļēāļāļēāļĻāļŦāļ™āļēāļ§āļˆāļąāļ”) âžĪ āļŠāļēāļ§āļŠāļļāļ„āļŠāļĩāđ€āļžāļēāļ°āļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļļāđŒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āļĨāļēāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđƒāļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļŦāļīāļĄāļ° âžĪ āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŦāļĄāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ āļ­āļķāļ” āļ–āļķāļ āļ—āļ™ āļ§āļīāđˆāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ„āļāļĨ āļāļīāļ™āļ™āđ‰āļ­āļĒ āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļ™āļīāļŠāļąāļĒ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĄāļīāļ•āļĢāļāļąāļšāļ„āļ™ ðŸķ āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āđ€āļ”āđˆāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđƒāļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļ­āļēāļāļēāļĻāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒ * āļ‚āļ™āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™ āļŦāļ™āļēāđāļ™āđˆāļ™ āļ—āļ™āļŦāļ™āļēāļ§āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļĩ * āļŦāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļžāļ§āļ‡ āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ›āļīāļ”āļˆāļĄāļđāļāļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™āļ­āļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļļāđˆāļ™ * āļ”āļ§āļ‡āļ•āļēāļŠāļĩāļŸāđ‰āļēāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĩ āļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ”āļ”āđ€āļ”āđˆāļ™ * āļ‚āļ™āļēāļ”āļāļ°āļ—āļąāļ”āļĢāļąāļ” āđāļ‚āđ‡āļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡ āļ„āļĨāđˆāļ­āļ‡āđāļ„āļĨāđˆāļ§ * āļ™āļīāļŠāļąāļĒāļ‚āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™ āļĢāļąāļāļ­āļīāļŠāļĢāļ° āļŠāļ­āļšāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļđāļ‡ ðŸš€ āļŦāļĄāļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļļāđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļđāđ‰āļˆāļąāļāļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĨāļāđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļ—āļĩāđˆ 20 āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļˆāļēāļāļ•āļģāļ™āļēāļ™ "āļšāļąāļĨāđ‚āļ• (Balto)" āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļēāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļ§āļąāļ„āļ‹āļĩāļ™āļāđˆāļēāļŦāļīāļĄāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ āđ† āđƒāļ™āļ­āļĨāļēāļŠāļāļē āļ›āļĩ 1925 🧊ðŸū #āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ #āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŪāļąāļŠāļāļĩāđ‰ #āļāļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ”āļŦāļĄāļēāđ„āļ‹ #āļŦāļĄāļēāļĨāļēāļāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™ #āļ•āļģāļ™āļēāļ™āļšāļąāļĨāđ‚āļ• #ChukchiDogs #āđ„āļ‹āļšāļĩāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļ–āļīāđˆāļ™ #āļŦāļĄāļēāļŠāļēāļĒāļŦāļ™āļēāļ§ LINE ID: @etravelway 78s.me/d0c307 Facebook: etravelway 78s.me/8a4061 Twitter: @eTravelWay 78s.me/e603f5 Tiktok : https://78s.me/543eb9 📷: etravelway 78s.me/05e8da ☎ïļ: 0 2116 6395 #āđāļžāđ‡āļ„āđ€āļāļˆāļ—āļąāļ§āļĢāđŒ #āļˆāļąāļ”āļāļĢāļļāđŠāļ›āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§ #eTravelway
    0 Comments 0 Shares 352 Views 0 Reviews
  • From Trainee To Bias: The Big 16 K-Pop Slang Terms To Know

    K-pop is the name of a pop music sensation that originated in South Korea and is sweeping the globe. From its energetic choreography and music to the beauty of its idols, K-pop (or K for Korea combined with pop) has entranced international and Korean fans alike—and chances are you’ve heard it, hummed it, or danced to it. (Did you catch BTS’ “Friends” playing in the Marvel movie Eternals? And who knew Clifford the Dog was also a K-pop stan? At least, his trailer made it seem so.)

    Emerging from the 1990s, K-pop has created a unique fandom culture along the way. Fans have indulged fully in this media, creating their own celebrations, traditions, and—of course—slang. All of this can overwhelm the casual listener trying out K-pop sounds, and I have to admit, I once thought this fandom was a little over the top. But I’ve since been won over—after all, being a fan of a group like Red Velvet is no different from being a fan of Ariana Grande.

    To get you started, I am providing a short guide to K-pop’s complex terminology. Whether you’re interested in K-pop, saw BTS on the news, or have friends who listen to all of the above, here are a few terms to know.

    Please note: these words are used mainly by English-speaking international fans and are found across fan Twitters, Instagrams, TikToks and Tumblrs.

    bias
    In K-pop slang, a bias is a member in a group that you like or relate to the most. K-pop fans collect merchandise—for example, photocards (more on that later)—of their biases. Fans use this term to learn more about other fans.

    Example: Who is your Twice bias? (And you’d answer with your favorite.)

    biaswrecker
    Although fans have their fundamental biases, it doesn’t mean that a bias is monogamous. Most fans with biases will have their biaswreckers, too. These wreckers are members in a group that make you question who your true bias is.

    sasaeng
    One group of people widely looked down upon are sasaengs (ė‚ŽėƒíŒŽ) or sasaeng fans. This slang derives from a Korean word (sa for “private” and saeng for “life”) that refers to an obsessive fan who stalks or otherwise violates the privacy of a Korean idol. Sasaengs tend to own fan pages, and some say they operate much like the American tabloids of the 2000s.

    comeback
    When an idol group releases new music, it’s called a comeback. Comebacks usually take place every few months and include new promotions, hair colors, styles, music, etc. Era is another word used in this fandom to describe a comeback.

    Example: Did you hear that BTS are having a comeback in June?

    nugu
    This word literally means “Who?” in Korean, and is used by fans to describe small and relatively unknown idol groups. A group like IVE would not be described as a nugu (누ęĩŽ) but the girl group Weki Meki would.

    visual
    In K-pop, there are roles for each idol in a group, including a role as visual. The visual role is assigned by the company to the member or members in a group who best fit a strict Korean beauty standard. Fans also debate who they believe the visual to be in each group. For example, Jin is the official visual of the group BTS, but many consider Taehyung to fit the role. This harsh beauty standard prizes small facial features, cuteness, and specific measurements of the face, body, eyes, and much more.

    aegyo
    Aegyo (ė• ęĩ) can be used to describe K-pop idols (both male and female) who are acting cute and childlike. Aegyo moves require specific word choices, vocal tones, and both facial and body gestures. Aegyo (often translated as “cuteness”) is usually meant to show a flirtatious side of idols and is also used by the general Korean population.

    Example: The judges made Felix do aegyo as a punishment for losing the game.

    maknae
    Another Korean word that has been adopted into international fan spaces is maknae (막ë‚ī) or “youngest person.” This slang is used to describe the youngest member of a group. The term maknae, much like visual, is a role a member takes on.

    trainee
    When an idol is training before they debut, they are considered a trainee. These trainees usually take part in promotions, trying to gain popularity before their debut. Trainees typically are under contract and fulfill years of rigorous training to be able to match the abilities of many idols you see today.

    subunit
    In some idol groups subunits are formed. These units comprise a few members in a group who create their own music or albums. Some groups, such as LOONA and NCT, use subunits as their concept. This term can also describe two or three members in a group who have a similar skill or talent (like a vocal or dance unit).

    antis
    Anti or anti-fan is used to describe people who hate an artist or group so much that they seem to follow their activities and content as much or more than a fan would. Some of these antis display sasaeng behavior, dedicating themselves completely to taking down or hate speech idols. These hate campaigns contain criticizing and insulting language. Shockingly, some antis have gone so far as hurting idols in real life.

    delulu
    This term is short for delusional, and it’s used to mock fans who believe they’ll date, marry, or befriend their favorite idol. The word can describe a fan who devotes an unhealthy amount of time and energy to an idol. You could say becoming a delulu is a first step on the pipeline towards sasaeng and usually includes behavior similar to said sasaeng.

    Example: Did you see that guy talking about how he and Nayeon are dating? He’s such a delulu.

    solo stan
    When a fan of an idol group only stans a single member, they are a self-proclaimed solo stan or are labeled as such by others in the community. A solo stan might hate other members in a group, which is why the term has a negative connotation in the community. The word solo stan also can describe someone who’s a fan of a singular idol (like Sunmi or IU) who does not participate in idol groups.

    photocard
    Photocards (or pocas or PCs) are typically 3” by 2” pieces of glossy paper photos included in a K-pop albums and prized by fans. They may not sound like much to the average joe, but to the average Jimin fan, these pictures are worth hundreds to thousands of dollars.

    the Big 3
    In Korea, idols are contracted under companies. The Big 3 describes the main three corporations that famous idols usually sign under. These three companies are HYBE Entertainment (previously known as BigHit Entertainment), with groups like BTS and TXT; SM Entertainment, with groups like Girls Generation and Aespa; and YG Entertainment, producing groups like BLACKPINK and iKON. The Big 3 not only produce idols but also sign and manage actors. JYP Entertainment can also be considered as part of the Big 3 (HYBE is a relative newcomer to the list), leading some to use the term “Big 4.”

    netizen
    The term netizen does generally mean an internet user, but it’s used in K-pop to refer to Korean fans who are online intensively. These fans or anti-fans are internet sleuths and usually the ones to create scandals and/or help in proving rumors wrong or right about specific idols. Netizens (or also K-netizens) hold power in the idol industry; companies want these internet personas to view their idols in a positive light and do their best to prevent scandals that might mobilize netizens.

    ÂĐ 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    From Trainee To Bias: The Big 16 K-Pop Slang Terms To Know K-pop is the name of a pop music sensation that originated in South Korea and is sweeping the globe. From its energetic choreography and music to the beauty of its idols, K-pop (or K for Korea combined with pop) has entranced international and Korean fans alike—and chances are you’ve heard it, hummed it, or danced to it. (Did you catch BTS’ “Friends” playing in the Marvel movie Eternals? And who knew Clifford the Dog was also a K-pop stan? At least, his trailer made it seem so.) Emerging from the 1990s, K-pop has created a unique fandom culture along the way. Fans have indulged fully in this media, creating their own celebrations, traditions, and—of course—slang. All of this can overwhelm the casual listener trying out K-pop sounds, and I have to admit, I once thought this fandom was a little over the top. But I’ve since been won over—after all, being a fan of a group like Red Velvet is no different from being a fan of Ariana Grande. To get you started, I am providing a short guide to K-pop’s complex terminology. Whether you’re interested in K-pop, saw BTS on the news, or have friends who listen to all of the above, here are a few terms to know. Please note: these words are used mainly by English-speaking international fans and are found across fan Twitters, Instagrams, TikToks and Tumblrs. bias In K-pop slang, a bias is a member in a group that you like or relate to the most. K-pop fans collect merchandise—for example, photocards (more on that later)—of their biases. Fans use this term to learn more about other fans. Example: Who is your Twice bias? (And you’d answer with your favorite.) biaswrecker Although fans have their fundamental biases, it doesn’t mean that a bias is monogamous. Most fans with biases will have their biaswreckers, too. These wreckers are members in a group that make you question who your true bias is. sasaeng One group of people widely looked down upon are sasaengs (ė‚ŽėƒíŒŽ) or sasaeng fans. This slang derives from a Korean word (sa for “private” and saeng for “life”) that refers to an obsessive fan who stalks or otherwise violates the privacy of a Korean idol. Sasaengs tend to own fan pages, and some say they operate much like the American tabloids of the 2000s. comeback When an idol group releases new music, it’s called a comeback. Comebacks usually take place every few months and include new promotions, hair colors, styles, music, etc. Era is another word used in this fandom to describe a comeback. Example: Did you hear that BTS are having a comeback in June? nugu This word literally means “Who?” in Korean, and is used by fans to describe small and relatively unknown idol groups. A group like IVE would not be described as a nugu (누ęĩŽ) but the girl group Weki Meki would. visual In K-pop, there are roles for each idol in a group, including a role as visual. The visual role is assigned by the company to the member or members in a group who best fit a strict Korean beauty standard. Fans also debate who they believe the visual to be in each group. For example, Jin is the official visual of the group BTS, but many consider Taehyung to fit the role. This harsh beauty standard prizes small facial features, cuteness, and specific measurements of the face, body, eyes, and much more. aegyo Aegyo (ė• ęĩ) can be used to describe K-pop idols (both male and female) who are acting cute and childlike. Aegyo moves require specific word choices, vocal tones, and both facial and body gestures. Aegyo (often translated as “cuteness”) is usually meant to show a flirtatious side of idols and is also used by the general Korean population. Example: The judges made Felix do aegyo as a punishment for losing the game. maknae Another Korean word that has been adopted into international fan spaces is maknae (막ë‚ī) or “youngest person.” This slang is used to describe the youngest member of a group. The term maknae, much like visual, is a role a member takes on. trainee When an idol is training before they debut, they are considered a trainee. These trainees usually take part in promotions, trying to gain popularity before their debut. Trainees typically are under contract and fulfill years of rigorous training to be able to match the abilities of many idols you see today. subunit In some idol groups subunits are formed. These units comprise a few members in a group who create their own music or albums. Some groups, such as LOONA and NCT, use subunits as their concept. This term can also describe two or three members in a group who have a similar skill or talent (like a vocal or dance unit). antis Anti or anti-fan is used to describe people who hate an artist or group so much that they seem to follow their activities and content as much or more than a fan would. Some of these antis display sasaeng behavior, dedicating themselves completely to taking down or hate speech idols. These hate campaigns contain criticizing and insulting language. Shockingly, some antis have gone so far as hurting idols in real life. delulu This term is short for delusional, and it’s used to mock fans who believe they’ll date, marry, or befriend their favorite idol. The word can describe a fan who devotes an unhealthy amount of time and energy to an idol. You could say becoming a delulu is a first step on the pipeline towards sasaeng and usually includes behavior similar to said sasaeng. Example: Did you see that guy talking about how he and Nayeon are dating? He’s such a delulu. solo stan When a fan of an idol group only stans a single member, they are a self-proclaimed solo stan or are labeled as such by others in the community. A solo stan might hate other members in a group, which is why the term has a negative connotation in the community. The word solo stan also can describe someone who’s a fan of a singular idol (like Sunmi or IU) who does not participate in idol groups. photocard Photocards (or pocas or PCs) are typically 3” by 2” pieces of glossy paper photos included in a K-pop albums and prized by fans. They may not sound like much to the average joe, but to the average Jimin fan, these pictures are worth hundreds to thousands of dollars. the Big 3 In Korea, idols are contracted under companies. The Big 3 describes the main three corporations that famous idols usually sign under. These three companies are HYBE Entertainment (previously known as BigHit Entertainment), with groups like BTS and TXT; SM Entertainment, with groups like Girls Generation and Aespa; and YG Entertainment, producing groups like BLACKPINK and iKON. The Big 3 not only produce idols but also sign and manage actors. JYP Entertainment can also be considered as part of the Big 3 (HYBE is a relative newcomer to the list), leading some to use the term “Big 4.” netizen The term netizen does generally mean an internet user, but it’s used in K-pop to refer to Korean fans who are online intensively. These fans or anti-fans are internet sleuths and usually the ones to create scandals and/or help in proving rumors wrong or right about specific idols. Netizens (or also K-netizens) hold power in the idol industry; companies want these internet personas to view their idols in a positive light and do their best to prevent scandals that might mobilize netizens. © 2025, Aakkhra, All rights reserved.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 727 Views 0 Reviews
  • https://youtube.com/shorts/k9gYdbNYw4U?si=doGNz_AeaxZOl77d
    https://youtube.com/shorts/k9gYdbNYw4U?si=doGNz_AeaxZOl77d
    0 Comments 0 Shares 74 Views 0 Reviews
  • https://youtube.com/shorts/D9ZIEipLsaY?si=BEdoG7Z4orPwPbb4
    https://youtube.com/shorts/D9ZIEipLsaY?si=BEdoG7Z4orPwPbb4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 133 Views 0 Reviews
  • https://youtu.be/FtaXmaFnwFc?si=xmZp7ORJzH4FDOgh
    https://youtu.be/FtaXmaFnwFc?si=xmZp7ORJzH4FDOgh
    0 Comments 0 Shares 88 Views 0 Reviews
  • onedogdiddoc.com
    #āđ‚āļĨāļ‡āļĻāļžāļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡
    #āļ§āļąāļ™āļ”āđ‡āļ­āļāļ”āļīāđŠāļ”āļ”āđ‡āļ­āļ„
    #āļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļĩāļĄāļ·āļ­āļ›āļĢāļēāļ“āļĩāļ• āļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄ
    #āļāļĨāđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļđāļāļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡
    #āļŦāļĄāļ­āļ™āļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļēāļĐāļĢāļąāļāļĐāđŒāđ‚āļĨāļ
    #āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļˆāļēāļāļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļī
    āđ‚āļ—āļĢ: 081-616-4295
    onedogdiddoc.com #āđ‚āļĨāļ‡āļĻāļžāļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡ #āļ§āļąāļ™āļ”āđ‡āļ­āļāļ”āļīāđŠāļ”āļ”āđ‡āļ­āļ„ #āļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļĩāļĄāļ·āļ­āļ›āļĢāļēāļ“āļĩāļ• āļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄ #āļāļĨāđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļđāļāļŠāļąāļ•āļ§āđŒāđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡ #āļŦāļĄāļ­āļ™āļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļēāļĐāļĢāļąāļāļĐāđŒāđ‚āļĨāļ #āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļˆāļēāļāļ§āļąāļŠāļ”āļļāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļī āđ‚āļ—āļĢ: 081-616-4295
    Like
    Love
    2
    0 Comments 1 Shares 446 Views 0 Reviews
  • IRS āđ€āļ•āļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđāļ—āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āđ€āļĨāļīāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļ āļāļĢāļĄāļŠāļĢāļĢāļžāļēāļāļĢāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ (IRS) āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ§āļēāļ‡āđāļœāļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™ āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢ āļ›āļĨāļ”āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡ 25% āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡ Scott Bessent āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē AI āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™

    āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ‡ IRS āļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļœāļđāđ‰āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāđ„āļ›āđ€āļāļ·āļ­āļšāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄ āđ‚āļ”āļĒ āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ (DOGE) āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āļģāđ‚āļ”āļĒ Elon Musk āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļēāļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”

    IRS āļ§āļēāļ‡āđāļœāļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ›āļĨāļ”āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ 25%
    - āļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡ Scott Bessent āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē AI āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž

    āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ‡ IRS āļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļœāļđāđ‰āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāđ„āļ›āđ€āļāļ·āļ­āļšāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄ
    - āđ‚āļ”āļĒ āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ (DOGE) āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āļģāđ‚āļ”āļĒ Elon Musk āļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™

    AI āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĄāļēāļāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™
    - Bessent āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļ­āļąāļˆāļ‰āļĢāļīāļĒāļ°āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļ§āļ”āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™

    āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāđ‰āļēāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļ·āļ™āļ āļēāļĐāļĩ
    - āđāļ•āđˆ IRS āđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ§āđˆāļē AI āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļĨāļ”āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰

    DOGE āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĒāļāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļāļąāļšāļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ IBM, Deloitte āđāļĨāļ° Gartner
    - āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­ āļĨāļ”āļ„āđˆāļēāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļˆāđˆāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ

    https://www.techradar.com/pro/irs-could-use-ai-to-replace-workers-after-mass-layoffs
    IRS āđ€āļ•āļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđāļ—āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āđ€āļĨāļīāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļ āļāļĢāļĄāļŠāļĢāļĢāļžāļēāļāļĢāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ (IRS) āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ§āļēāļ‡āđāļœāļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™ āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢ āļ›āļĨāļ”āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡ 25% āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡ Scott Bessent āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē AI āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž āđāļĄāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ‡ IRS āļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļœāļđāđ‰āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāđ„āļ›āđ€āļāļ·āļ­āļšāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄ āđ‚āļ”āļĒ āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ (DOGE) āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āļģāđ‚āļ”āļĒ Elon Musk āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļēāļ­āļ­āļāđāļšāļšāđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ” âœ… IRS āļ§āļēāļ‡āđāļœāļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ›āļĨāļ”āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ 25% - āļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡ Scott Bessent āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē AI āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļž âœ… āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ—āļĢāļąāļĄāļ›āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ‡ IRS āļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļœāļđāđ‰āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāđ„āļ›āđ€āļāļ·āļ­āļšāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄ - āđ‚āļ”āļĒ āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ (DOGE) āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ™āļģāđ‚āļ”āļĒ Elon Musk āļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ âœ… AI āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĄāļēāļāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ - Bessent āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļ­āļąāļˆāļ‰āļĢāļīāļĒāļ°āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ āļēāļĐāļĩāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļ§āļ”āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ âœ… āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāđ‰āļēāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļ·āļ™āļ āļēāļĐāļĩ - āđāļ•āđˆ IRS āđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ§āđˆāļē AI āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļĨāļ”āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰ ✅ DOGE āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĒāļāđ€āļĨāļīāļāļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļāļąāļšāļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ IBM, Deloitte āđāļĨāļ° Gartner - āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­ āļĨāļ”āļ„āđˆāļēāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļˆāđˆāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ https://www.techradar.com/pro/irs-could-use-ai-to-replace-workers-after-mass-layoffs
    0 Comments 0 Shares 281 Views 0 Reviews
  • Adobe āļĨāļ”āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ 70% āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļŠāļđāđˆāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ Adobe āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻ āļĨāļ”āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡ 70% āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļĨāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļēāļĐāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđ„āļ›āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļˆāļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡ 30 āļžāļĪāļĻāļˆāļīāļāļēāļĒāļ™ 2025

    āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒ US General Services Administration (GSA) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē Adobe āļˆāļ°āļ™āļģāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­ "Paperless Government Solution" āđƒāļ™āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ– āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļļāļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™ āļĨāļ”āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™

    Adobe āļĨāļ”āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡ 70%
    - āļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļˆāļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡ 30 āļžāļĪāļĻāļˆāļīāļāļēāļĒāļ™ 2025

    GSA āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē Adobe āļˆāļ°āļ™āļģāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­ "Paperless Government Solution" āđƒāļ™āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐ
    - āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļĨāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļēāļĐāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™

    āļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ§āļĄāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­ āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ Acrobat Premium, Acrobat Sign āđāļĨāļ° Adobe Express āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢ
    - āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĄāļēāļāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™

    Adobe āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļŠāļđāđˆāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļ§āļ”āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļļāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļ­āļšāļŠāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāļąāļ
    - āļĨāļ” āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāđ‰āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļœāļīāļ”āļžāļĨāļēāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ”āļīāļĄ

    āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ GSA āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŠāļīāļ™āļ„āđ‰āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢ
    - āļĄāļļāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļ āļąāļ“āļ‘āđŒāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļžāļēāļ“āļīāļŠāļĒāđŒāđāļ—āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āđāļšāļšāđāļĒāļāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™

    https://www.techradar.com/pro/adobe-offers-us-government-discounted-software-following-doge-review
    Adobe āļĨāļ”āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ 70% āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļŠāļđāđˆāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ Adobe āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻ āļĨāļ”āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡ 70% āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļĨāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļēāļĐāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđ„āļ›āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļˆāļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡ 30 āļžāļĪāļĻāļˆāļīāļāļēāļĒāļ™ 2025 āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒ US General Services Administration (GSA) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē Adobe āļˆāļ°āļ™āļģāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­ "Paperless Government Solution" āđƒāļ™āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ– āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļļāļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™ āļĨāļ”āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļ”āļģāđ€āļ™āļīāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™ âœ… Adobe āļĨāļ”āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ–āļķāļ‡ 70% - āļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļˆāļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡ 30 āļžāļĪāļĻāļˆāļīāļāļēāļĒāļ™ 2025 ✅ GSA āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē Adobe āļˆāļ°āļ™āļģāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­ "Paperless Government Solution" āđƒāļ™āļĢāļēāļ„āļēāļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐ - āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļĨāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ”āļēāļĐāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™ âœ… āļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ§āļĄāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­ āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ Acrobat Premium, Acrobat Sign āđāļĨāļ° Adobe Express āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢ - āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļĄāļēāļāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ âœ… Adobe āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļŠāļđāđˆāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļ§āļ”āđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŦāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļļāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļ­āļšāļŠāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļĢāļąāļ - āļĨāļ” āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāđˆāļēāļŠāđ‰āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļœāļīāļ”āļžāļĨāļēāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ”āļīāļĄ âœ… āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ GSA āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļŠāļīāļ™āļ„āđ‰āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢ - āļĄāļļāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļ āļąāļ“āļ‘āđŒāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļžāļēāļ“āļīāļŠāļĒāđŒāđāļ—āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āđāļšāļšāđāļĒāļāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™ https://www.techradar.com/pro/adobe-offers-us-government-discounted-software-following-doge-review
    0 Comments 0 Shares 289 Views 0 Reviews
  • āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ DOGE āļ–āļđāļāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļœāļĒāđāļžāļĢāđˆāļšāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™āđŒ āļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Kyle Schutt āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ āļ§āļīāļĻāļ§āļāļĢāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļšāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡ CISA āđāļĨāļ° DOGE āļ–āļđāļāļžāļšāđƒāļ™ āļāļēāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ§āļšāļĢāļ§āļĄāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ āļąāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ

    DOGE āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ Department of Government Efficiency āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ āļĄāļĩ Elon Musk āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģ āđāļĨāļ°āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ°āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ āļąāļĒāļ—āļēāļ‡āđ„āļ‹āđ€āļšāļ­āļĢāđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™

    āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Kyle Schutt āļ–āļđāļāļžāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ§āļšāļĢāļ§āļĄāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ
    - āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ CISA āđāļĨāļ° DOGE āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ–āļđāļāđ€āļˆāļēāļ°āļĢāļ°āļšāļš

    DOGE āļĄāļĩāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡
    - āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ°āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ

    Schutt āđ€āļ„āļĒāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ FEMA āđƒāļ™āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāļļāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒ
    - āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ•āļāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡

    āļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļˆāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļīāļ”āđ€āļŠāļ·āđ‰āļ­
    - āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļ–āļđāļāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļœāļđāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļ”āļĩ

    Elon Musk āļ–āļđāļāļ§āļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‚āļēāđƒāļ™āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§
    - āļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļš āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™āđŒāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡ Tesla āđāļĨāļ° DOGE

    https://www.neowin.net/news/stolen-credentials-linked-to-compromised-doge-employee-found-circulating-online/
    āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ DOGE āļ–āļđāļāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļœāļĒāđāļžāļĢāđˆāļšāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™āđŒ āļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļē āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Kyle Schutt āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ āļ§āļīāļĻāļ§āļāļĢāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļšāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡ CISA āđāļĨāļ° DOGE āļ–āļđāļāļžāļšāđƒāļ™ āļāļēāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ§āļšāļĢāļ§āļĄāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ āļąāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ DOGE āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ Department of Government Efficiency āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ āļĄāļĩ Elon Musk āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģ āđāļĨāļ°āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ°āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ āļąāļĒāļ—āļēāļ‡āđ„āļ‹āđ€āļšāļ­āļĢāđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™ âœ… āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Kyle Schutt āļ–āļđāļāļžāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļ§āļšāļĢāļ§āļĄāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨ - āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ CISA āđāļĨāļ° DOGE āđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ–āļđāļāđ€āļˆāļēāļ°āļĢāļ°āļšāļš âœ… DOGE āļĄāļĩāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļāļĨāļēāļ‡ - āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡ āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ°āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĨāļąāļ‡āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ ✅ Schutt āđ€āļ„āļĒāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ FEMA āđƒāļ™āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāļļāļĄāļ āļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒ - āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļ•āļāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡ âœ… āļĄāļąāļĨāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āđ‚āļĄāļĒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļˆāļąāļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĨāđ‡āļ­āļāļ­āļīāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļļāļ›āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļīāļ”āđ€āļŠāļ·āđ‰āļ­ - āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļˆāļ–āļđāļāļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļœāļđāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļ”āļĩ ✅ Elon Musk āļ–āļđāļāļ§āļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‚āļēāđƒāļ™āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§ - āļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļš āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™āđŒāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡ Tesla āđāļĨāļ° DOGE https://www.neowin.net/news/stolen-credentials-linked-to-compromised-doge-employee-found-circulating-online/
    WWW.NEOWIN.NET
    Stolen credentials linked to compromised DOGE employee found circulating online
    A new report has surfaced that the credentials of a DOGE software engineer were present in multiple public dumps from info-stealer malware infections.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 335 Views 0 Reviews
  • Palantir Technologies āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄ āļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļ›āļĩ āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢ AI āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āđāļ•āđˆāļāļĨāļąāļšāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ 8% āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ‚āļēāļĒāļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ•āļĨāļēāļ” āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰

    āđāļĄāđ‰āļ§āđˆāļēāļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir āļˆāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 60% āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ™āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™ AI āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāđƒāļ™āļ āļēāļ„āļĢāļąāļ āđāļ•āđˆāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ 883.9 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ„āļ§āđ‰āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡ 2.4% āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļœāļīāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡

    āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ„āļīāļ”āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 42% āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđƒāļ™āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļ āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļĢāļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ™āļģāđ‚āļ”āļĒ Elon Musk āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­āļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—

    Palantir āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļ›āļĩ
    - āļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĩ 2025 āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ 3.89 - 3.90 āļžāļąāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ
    - āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļ”āļīāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆ 3.74 - 3.76 āļžāļąāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ

    āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ 8% āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļāļēāļĢ
    - āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰
    - āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ 883.9 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡ 2.4%

    āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir
    - āļ„āļīāļ”āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 42% āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđƒāļ™āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļ
    - āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢ āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļŦāļēāļĢ

    āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ DOGE
    - āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­ āļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir āļāļąāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ
    - Palantir āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ

    https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2025/05/06/palantir-raises-annual-revenue-forecast-on-booming-ai-demand
    Palantir Technologies āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄ āļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļ›āļĩ āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢ AI āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āđāļ•āđˆāļāļĨāļąāļšāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰ āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ 8% āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ‚āļēāļĒāļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ•āļĨāļēāļ” āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āđāļĄāđ‰āļ§āđˆāļēāļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir āļˆāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 60% āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĩāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ™āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™ AI āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāđƒāļ™āļ āļēāļ„āļĢāļąāļ āđāļ•āđˆāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ 883.9 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ„āļ§āđ‰āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡ 2.4% āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļœāļīāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ„āļīāļ”āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 42% āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđƒāļ™āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļ āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļĢāļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ™āļģāđ‚āļ”āļĒ Elon Musk āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­āļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ— âœ… Palantir āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļģāļ›āļĩ - āļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĩ 2025 āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ 3.89 - 3.90 āļžāļąāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ - āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļ”āļīāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆ 3.74 - 3.76 āļžāļąāļ™āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ ✅ āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ 8% āļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļāļēāļĢ - āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰ - āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆ 883.9 āļĨāđ‰āļēāļ™āļ”āļ­āļĨāļĨāļēāļĢāđŒ āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡ 2.4% ✅ āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļđāļāļ„āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir - āļ„āļīāļ”āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 42% āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđƒāļ™āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļ - āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢāļ‹āļ­āļŸāļ•āđŒāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢ āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļŦāļēāļĢ âœ… āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ DOGE - āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ­āļēāļˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­ āļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Palantir āļāļąāļšāļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ - Palantir āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļąāļāļšāļēāļĨ https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2025/05/06/palantir-raises-annual-revenue-forecast-on-booming-ai-demand
    WWW.THESTAR.COM.MY
    Palantir raises annual revenue forecast on AI demand but investors unimpressed
    (Reuters) -Palantir Technologies raised its annual sales forecast on Monday, although its inline profit and a modest revenue beat disappointed investors who were expecting more from the AI-focused data and analytics firm, driving its shares down 8% in extended trading.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 160 Views 0 Reviews
  • Intel āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āļ•āļąāļ§ IPO (Intel Performance Optimizations) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŸāļĩāđ€āļˆāļ­āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļšāļ™ Core Ultra 200S (Arrow Lake) āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļˆāļēāļāļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļšāļ™ BiliBili āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē IPO āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļē 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļāļĄ

    āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāđƒāļŠāđ‰ Core Ultra 7 265K, āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļˆāļģ DDR5-8000, āđāļĨāļ° GeForce RTX 5090D āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ›āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļš XMP Configuration, 200S Boost, āđāļĨāļ° IPO āđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ† āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ Cyberpunk 2077, Forza Horizon 5, Counter-Strike 2 āđāļĨāļ° Watch Dogs: Legion

    IPO āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ P-core āđāļĨāļ° E-core āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 5.4 GHz āđāļĨāļ° 4.9 GHz āļ•āļēāļĄāļĨāļģāļ”āļąāļš āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Ring Bus āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 4 GHz āļ‚āļ“āļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆ 200S Boost āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āđ„āļ›āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Die-to-Die (D2D) āđāļĨāļ° Next Generation Uncore (NGU)

    āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē IPO āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļē 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļ—āļļāļāđ€āļāļĄ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ° Counter-Strike 2 āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 16% āđāļĨāļ° Cyberpunk 2077 āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 3%

    IPO vs. 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™āđ€āļāļĄ
    - IPO āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļē 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļ—āļļāļāđ€āļāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļš
    - Counter-Strike 2 āļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 16%
    - Cyberpunk 2077 āļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 3%

    āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ IPO
    - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ P-core āđāļĨāļ° E-core āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 5.4 GHz āđāļĨāļ° 4.9 GHz
    - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Ring Bus āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 4 GHz

    āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ 200S Boost
    - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Die-to-Die (D2D) āđāļĨāļ° Next Generation Uncore (NGU)

    āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡
    - 200S Boost āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļœāđˆāļēāļ™ āļ­āļąāļ›āđ€āļ”āļ•āđ€āļŸāļīāļĢāđŒāļĄāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĄāļ™āļšāļ­āļĢāđŒāļ”
    - IPO āļĄāļĩāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āđƒāļ™ āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļˆāļĩāļ™

    https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-ipo-delivers-better-gaming-performance-than-200s-boost-in-user-benchmarks
    Intel āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āļ•āļąāļ§ IPO (Intel Performance Optimizations) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŸāļĩāđ€āļˆāļ­āļĢāđŒāđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļšāļ™ Core Ultra 200S (Arrow Lake) āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļˆāļēāļāļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļšāļ™ BiliBili āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē IPO āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļē 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāđƒāļŠāđ‰ Core Ultra 7 265K, āļŦāļ™āđˆāļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļˆāļģ DDR5-8000, āđāļĨāļ° GeForce RTX 5090D āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ›āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļš XMP Configuration, 200S Boost, āđāļĨāļ° IPO āđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ† āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ Cyberpunk 2077, Forza Horizon 5, Counter-Strike 2 āđāļĨāļ° Watch Dogs: Legion IPO āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ P-core āđāļĨāļ° E-core āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 5.4 GHz āđāļĨāļ° 4.9 GHz āļ•āļēāļĄāļĨāļģāļ”āļąāļš āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Ring Bus āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 4 GHz āļ‚āļ“āļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆ 200S Boost āđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āđ„āļ›āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Die-to-Die (D2D) āđāļĨāļ° Next Generation Uncore (NGU) āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē IPO āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļē 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļ—āļļāļāđ€āļāļĄ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ° Counter-Strike 2 āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 16% āđāļĨāļ° Cyberpunk 2077 āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 3% ✅ IPO vs. 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™āđ€āļāļĄ - IPO āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļāļ§āđˆāļē 200S Boost āđƒāļ™āļ—āļļāļāđ€āļāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļš - Counter-Strike 2 āļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 16% - Cyberpunk 2077 āļĄāļĩāđ€āļŸāļĢāļĄāđ€āļĢāļ•āļŠāļđāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ 3% ✅ āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ IPO - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ P-core āđāļĨāļ° E-core āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 5.4 GHz āđāļĨāļ° 4.9 GHz - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Ring Bus āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 4 GHz ✅ āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ 200S Boost - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāđ‡āļ§ Die-to-Die (D2D) āđāļĨāļ° Next Generation Uncore (NGU) ✅ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡ - 200S Boost āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļœāđˆāļēāļ™ āļ­āļąāļ›āđ€āļ”āļ•āđ€āļŸāļīāļĢāđŒāļĄāđāļ§āļĢāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĄāļ™āļšāļ­āļĢāđŒāļ” - IPO āļĄāļĩāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āđƒāļ™ āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļˆāļĩāļ™ https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-ipo-delivers-better-gaming-performance-than-200s-boost-in-user-benchmarks
    WWW.TOMSHARDWARE.COM
    Intel IPO delivers better gaming performance than 200S Boost in user benchmarks
    Similar performance-enhancing technology but slightly different results
    0 Comments 0 Shares 245 Views 0 Reviews
  • Elon Musk āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļēāļ•āļ­āļšāđ‚āļ•āđ‰āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Wall Street Journal (WSJ) āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļē āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļĄāļ­āļ‡āļŦāļēāļ‹āļĩāļ­āļĩāđ‚āļ­āļ„āļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āđ‚āļ”āļĒ Musk āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ”āļąāļ‡āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ "āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆ" āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ "āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ”āļˆāļĢāļīāļĒāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĢāđ‰āļēāļĒāđāļĢāļ‡"

    WSJ āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļīāļ”āļ•āđˆāļ­āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļˆāļąāļ”āļŦāļēāļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļŦāļēāļ‹āļĩāļ­āļĩāđ‚āļ­āļ„āļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļĢāļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ Robyn Denholm āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ˜āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļēāļ›āļāļīāđ€āļŠāļ˜āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļšāļąāļāļŠāļĩ X āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ— āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē "āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļīāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļĢāļēāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļˆāđ‰āļ‡āđ„āļ›āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļ°āļ–āļđāļāđ€āļœāļĒāđāļžāļĢāđˆ"

    āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ WSJ āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ Tesla āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āđ€āļœāļŠāļīāļāļāļąāļš āļĒāļ­āļ”āļ‚āļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļģāđ„āļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡ āļœāļđāđ‰āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļĢāļ–āļĒāļ™āļ•āđŒāđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļēāļĢāļēāļĒāđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđƒāļ™āđ‚āļĨāļ āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļš BYD āļˆāļēāļāļˆāļĩāļ™ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āļāđ‡āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĩ

    āļ­āļĩāļāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ WSJ āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ–āļķāļ‡āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Musk āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđ‚āļ”āļĒ Musk āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™ Donald Trump āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢ Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āđāļŠāļ§āļīāļžāļēāļāļĐāđŒāļ§āļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļļāđ‚āļĢāļ›

    āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļĒāļąāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļš āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ Musk āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļąāļš Tesla āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāđ€āļ‚āļēāļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™ SpaceX, Neuralink āđāļĨāļ° X āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļģāļ–āļēāļĄāļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ‚āļēāļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļāļąāļš Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĄāļēāļāļžāļ­āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ„āļĄāđˆ

    āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļ­āļšāđ‚āļ•āđ‰āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Elon Musk āđāļĨāļ° Tesla
    - Musk āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ WSJ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ "āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆ"
    - Robyn Denholm āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ˜āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āļ›āļāļīāđ€āļŠāļ˜āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļšāļąāļāļŠāļĩ X

    āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla
    - Tesla āļĄāļĩāļĒāļ­āļ”āļ‚āļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļģāđ„āļĢāļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡āđƒāļ™āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĩ 2025
    - āļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļĢāļ–āļĒāļ™āļ•āđŒāđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļēāļĢāļēāļĒāđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļš BYD āļˆāļēāļāļˆāļĩāļ™

    āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Musk
    - Musk āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™ Donald Trump āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢ DOGE
    - āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļļāđ‚āļĢāļ›

    āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ Musk āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļąāļš Tesla
    - āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļģāļ–āļēāļĄāļ§āđˆāļē Musk āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļāļąāļš Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĄāļēāļāļžāļ­āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ„āļĄāđˆ
    - Musk āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ‚āļēāļˆāļ° āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļąāļš Tesla āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļē

    https://www.neowin.net/news/elon-musk-accuses-wsj-of-lying-about-tesla-looking-for-a-new-ceo/
    Elon Musk āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļēāļ•āļ­āļšāđ‚āļ•āđ‰āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Wall Street Journal (WSJ) āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ§āđˆāļē āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļĄāļ­āļ‡āļŦāļēāļ‹āļĩāļ­āļĩāđ‚āļ­āļ„āļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āđ‚āļ”āļĒ Musk āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ”āļąāļ‡āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ "āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆ" āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ "āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ”āļˆāļĢāļīāļĒāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĢāđ‰āļēāļĒāđāļĢāļ‡" WSJ āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļīāļ”āļ•āđˆāļ­āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļˆāļąāļ”āļŦāļēāļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļĢāļīāđˆāļĄāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļŦāļēāļ‹āļĩāļ­āļĩāđ‚āļ­āļ„āļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļĢāļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ Robyn Denholm āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ˜āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļēāļ›āļāļīāđ€āļŠāļ˜āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļšāļąāļāļŠāļĩ X āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ— āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļē "āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļīāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļĢāļēāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļˆāđ‰āļ‡āđ„āļ›āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāđˆāļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļ°āļ–āļđāļāđ€āļœāļĒāđāļžāļĢāđˆ" āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ WSJ āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ Tesla āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āđ€āļœāļŠāļīāļāļāļąāļš āļĒāļ­āļ”āļ‚āļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļģāđ„āļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡ āļœāļđāđ‰āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļĢāļ–āļĒāļ™āļ•āđŒāđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļēāļĢāļēāļĒāđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđƒāļ™āđ‚āļĨāļ āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļš BYD āļˆāļēāļāļˆāļĩāļ™ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļŦāļļāđ‰āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āļāđ‡āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĩ āļ­āļĩāļāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ WSJ āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ–āļķāļ‡āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Musk āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđ‚āļ”āļĒ Musk āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™ Donald Trump āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢ Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āđāļŠāļ§āļīāļžāļēāļāļĐāđŒāļ§āļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļļāđ‚āļĢāļ› āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļĒāļąāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļš āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ Musk āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļąāļš Tesla āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāđ€āļ‚āļēāļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™ SpaceX, Neuralink āđāļĨāļ° X āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļģāļ–āļēāļĄāļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ‚āļēāļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļāļąāļš Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĄāļēāļāļžāļ­āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ„āļĄāđˆ ✅ āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļ­āļšāđ‚āļ•āđ‰āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Elon Musk āđāļĨāļ° Tesla - Musk āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ WSJ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ "āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļ—āđ‡āļˆ" - Robyn Denholm āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ˜āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āļ›āļāļīāđ€āļŠāļ˜āļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļšāļąāļāļŠāļĩ X ✅ āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ˜āļļāļĢāļāļīāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla - Tesla āļĄāļĩāļĒāļ­āļ”āļ‚āļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļģāđ„āļĢāļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡āđƒāļ™āđ„āļ•āļĢāļĄāļēāļŠāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĩ 2025 - āļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ•āļģāđāļŦāļ™āđˆāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļœāļĨāļīāļ•āļĢāļ–āļĒāļ™āļ•āđŒāđ„āļŸāļŸāđ‰āļēāļĢāļēāļĒāđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļš BYD āļˆāļēāļāļˆāļĩāļ™ âœ… āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Musk - Musk āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™ Donald Trump āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢ DOGE - āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Tesla āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļļāđ‚āļĢāļ› âœ… āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļāļąāļ‡āļ§āļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆ Musk āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļąāļš Tesla - āļ™āļąāļāļĨāļ‡āļ—āļļāļ™āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļģāļ–āļēāļĄāļ§āđˆāļē Musk āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļāļąāļš Tesla āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĄāļēāļāļžāļ­āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āđ„āļĄāđˆ - Musk āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ‚āļēāļˆāļ° āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļąāļš Tesla āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļē https://www.neowin.net/news/elon-musk-accuses-wsj-of-lying-about-tesla-looking-for-a-new-ceo/
    WWW.NEOWIN.NET
    Elon Musk accuses WSJ of lying about Tesla looking for a new CEO
    A recent report claimed that the Tesla board was seeking to replace its CEO. Now, Tesla's chair and Elon Musk have called this report false.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 421 Views 0 Reviews
  • āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļĻāļąāļāļĒāļ āļēāļžāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ™āļģāļ—āļēāļ‡āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļˆāļēāļāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ East London āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē AI āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāļ™āļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāļ–āļķāļ‡ 80% āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āđ€āļ§āļĨāļē 12 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļĨāļ”āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļāļēāļĢāļĨāđ‰āļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ§āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™

    AI āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āđāļšāļšāļŠāļ­āļšāļ–āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒ āļŠāļĄāļēāļ˜āļī āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļīāļāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ­āļēāļĒāļļ 6 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āđāļĨāļ° 12 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™ AI āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļˆāļąāļšāļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļĄāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄ

    āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ‚āļĨāļ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ The Seeing Eye āđāļĨāļ° Canine Companions āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĢāļ„āļ”āļĩ Netflix āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡ Inside the Mind of a Dog

    āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ AI
    - AI āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāļ™āļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāļ–āļķāļ‡ 80%
    - āļĨāļ”āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļāļēāļĢāļĨāđ‰āļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ§āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚

    āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ
    - āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđāļšāļšāļŠāļ­āļšāļ–āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒ āļŠāļĄāļēāļ˜āļī āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļīāļāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚
    - AI āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļˆāļąāļšāļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļāļķāļāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄ

    āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ‚āļĨāļ
    - āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļ The Seeing Eye āđāļĨāļ° Canine Companions
    - āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāđ€āļŦāļĨāđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™āļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ™āļģāļ—āļēāļ‡

    āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢ
    - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ™āļģāļ—āļēāļ‡
    - āļĨāļ”āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĨāđ‰āļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ§āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļ

    https://www.techradar.com/computing/artificial-intelligence/ai-is-better-at-picking-which-puppy-will-make-a-good-guide-dog-than-humans-are
    āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§āļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļĻāļąāļāļĒāļ āļēāļžāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ™āļģāļ—āļēāļ‡āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļšāļĢāļīāļāļēāļĢ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļˆāļēāļāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ East London āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē AI āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāļ™āļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāļ–āļķāļ‡ 80% āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āđ€āļ§āļĨāļē 12 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰ AI āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļĨāļ”āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļāļēāļĢāļĨāđ‰āļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ§āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™ AI āļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āđāļšāļšāļŠāļ­āļšāļ–āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒ āļŠāļĄāļēāļ˜āļī āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļīāļāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ­āļēāļĒāļļ 6 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āđāļĨāļ° 12 āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™ AI āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļˆāļąāļšāļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļĄāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄ āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ‚āļĨāļ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ The Seeing Eye āđāļĨāļ° Canine Companions āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĢāļ„āļ”āļĩ Netflix āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡ Inside the Mind of a Dog ✅ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ AI - AI āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāļ™āļēāļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđˆāļ™āļĒāļģāļ–āļķāļ‡ 80% - āļĨāļ”āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļāļēāļĢāļĨāđ‰āļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ§āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚ âœ… āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ - āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđāļšāļšāļŠāļ­āļšāļ–āļēāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒ āļŠāļĄāļēāļ˜āļī āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļļāļ„āļĨāļīāļāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚ - AI āļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļˆāļąāļšāļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļāļķāļāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄ âœ… āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ‚āļĨāļ - āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļˆāļēāļ The Seeing Eye āđāļĨāļ° Canine Companions - āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāđ€āļŦāļĨāđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™āļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ™āļģāļ—āļēāļ‡ âœ… āđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢ - āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ‚āļ™āļģāļ—āļēāļ‡ - āļĨāļ”āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĨāđ‰āļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāļ§āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļ https://www.techradar.com/computing/artificial-intelligence/ai-is-better-at-picking-which-puppy-will-make-a-good-guide-dog-than-humans-are
    0 Comments 0 Shares 302 Views 0 Reviews
More Results