• "คลาสถักมาคราเม่ Macrame"​ โดย​ ครูศักดิ์ชัย​​ ณ สมาคมบ้านปันรัก​ อารีย์ ซ.1
    การถักมาคราเม่ (Macrame) เป็นงานฝีมือที่ใช้เชือกป่านมาถักเป็นลวดลายต่างๆ นิยมนำมาทำเป็นของตกแต่งบ้าน กระเป๋า เครื่องประดับ หรือของใช้ต่างๆ
    อุปกรณ์ที่ใช้:
    เชือกป่าน: เลือกขนาดให้เหมาะกับงาน
    กรรไกร
    ไม้แขวน หรือ ตะปู สำหรับขึงงาน
    ไม้บรรทัด (กรณีต้องการงานที่มีขนาดเท่ากัน)
    เข็มกลัด (สำหรับงานบางประเภท)

    #สมาคมบ้านปันรัก#เรียนฟรี#เรียนออนไลน์#คอร์สเรียน#คลาสเรียน#เสริมทักษะ#อัพสกิล#skill
    #Macrame
    #สมาคมบ้านปันรัก
    #ถักมาคราเม่โดยครูศักดิ์ชัย
    #สยามโสภา#อาสาพาสุข#thaitimes #thaitimesสยามโสภา

    https://youtu.be/LuOxYfQbAuo?si=Umt2ZxQbnAYyqhto
    "คลาสถักมาคราเม่ Macrame"​ โดย​ ครูศักดิ์ชัย​​ ณ สมาคมบ้านปันรัก​ อารีย์ ซ.1 การถักมาคราเม่ (Macrame) เป็นงานฝีมือที่ใช้เชือกป่านมาถักเป็นลวดลายต่างๆ นิยมนำมาทำเป็นของตกแต่งบ้าน กระเป๋า เครื่องประดับ หรือของใช้ต่างๆ อุปกรณ์ที่ใช้: เชือกป่าน: เลือกขนาดให้เหมาะกับงาน กรรไกร ไม้แขวน หรือ ตะปู สำหรับขึงงาน ไม้บรรทัด (กรณีต้องการงานที่มีขนาดเท่ากัน) เข็มกลัด (สำหรับงานบางประเภท) #สมาคมบ้านปันรัก​ #เรียนฟรี​ #เรียนออนไลน์​ #คอร์สเรียน​ #คลาสเรียน​ #เสริมทักษะ​ #อัพสกิล​ #skill​ #Macrame​ #สมาคมบ้านปันรัก​ #ถักมาคราเม่โดยครูศักดิ์ชัย​ #สยามโสภา​ #อาสาพาสุข​ #thaitimes #thaitimesสยามโสภา https://youtu.be/LuOxYfQbAuo?si=Umt2ZxQbnAYyqhto
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 202 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • กิจกรรม SBAC OPEN HOUSE 2024 ปล่อยจอย ตะลุยแดนชาติพันธุ์ จอยๆกับน้องๆโรงเรียนเทศบาลท่าโขลง 1
    โดย SBAC Saphanmai
    #DEKSBAC68 #SBACDigitalGreenSkills #SBAC #ปวช #ปวส #ทวิภาคี #openhouse #สยามเด็กเล่น #siamplayground #thaitimes #thaitimesสยามโสภา #thaitimesเยาวชน
    กิจกรรม SBAC OPEN HOUSE 2024 ปล่อยจอย ตะลุยแดนชาติพันธุ์ จอยๆกับน้องๆโรงเรียนเทศบาลท่าโขลง 1 โดย SBAC Saphanmai #DEKSBAC68 #SBACDigitalGreenSkills #SBAC #ปวช #ปวส #ทวิภาคี #openhouse #สยามเด็กเล่น #siamplayground #thaitimes #thaitimesสยามโสภา #thaitimesเยาวชน
    Love
    Like
    3
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 775 มุมมอง 155 0 รีวิว
  • จับตาประชุมคณะกรรมการค่าจ้าง 20 ก.ย.นี้ การขึ้นค่าจ้างขั้นต่ำ 400 บาททั่วประเทศยากที่จะเป็นจริง คนในวงการอุตสาหกรรมแฉขึ้นค่าแรงขั้นต่ำ ‘นายจ้างเจ๊ง-เจ้าสัวรวย-แรงงานต่างชาติ’ ได้ประโยชน์ เสนอรัฐทำ ‘Pay by Skills-ลดค่าครองชีพ’ นายจ้างอยู่ได้ แรงงานได้ประโยชน์ แนะสังคมย้อนฟังคลิป ‘ทักษิณ-นายกฯ อิ๊ง’ ไม่พูดถึงค่าแรง ทั้งที่เพื่อไทยหาเสียงไว้ที่ 600 บาท

    อ่านต่อ >> https://news1live.com/detail/9670000087586

    #News1feed #News1 #Sondhitalk #คุยทุกเรื่องกับสนธิ #Thaitimes
    จับตาประชุมคณะกรรมการค่าจ้าง 20 ก.ย.นี้ การขึ้นค่าจ้างขั้นต่ำ 400 บาททั่วประเทศยากที่จะเป็นจริง คนในวงการอุตสาหกรรมแฉขึ้นค่าแรงขั้นต่ำ ‘นายจ้างเจ๊ง-เจ้าสัวรวย-แรงงานต่างชาติ’ ได้ประโยชน์ เสนอรัฐทำ ‘Pay by Skills-ลดค่าครองชีพ’ นายจ้างอยู่ได้ แรงงานได้ประโยชน์ แนะสังคมย้อนฟังคลิป ‘ทักษิณ-นายกฯ อิ๊ง’ ไม่พูดถึงค่าแรง ทั้งที่เพื่อไทยหาเสียงไว้ที่ 600 บาท อ่านต่อ >> https://news1live.com/detail/9670000087586 #News1feed #News1 #Sondhitalk #คุยทุกเรื่องกับสนธิ #Thaitimes
    Like
    Haha
    Sad
    Love
    Yay
    74
    2 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 6907 มุมมอง 1 รีวิว
  • การออกแบบชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ 4 ภาค" จำนวน 8 ชุด ผลงานออกแบบโดยนักศึกษา ระดับ ปวส.1 SBAC - Digital Graphic และผลงานตัดเย็บชุดโดย ร้านเช่าชุด SmileWay

    และการแสดงแบบโดยนางแบบมืออาชีพระดับเวทีนางงาม
    💜 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคเหนือ "ผีกะ"
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณศุภิสรา แสงทอง (ส้มส้ม) มิสแกรนด์ปราจีนบุรี 2023

    🩵 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคเหนือ "ฟ้อนกิงกะลา"
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณปลายฟ้า ทองดอนพุ่ม (ปลายฟ้า) มิสแกรนด์ประจวบคีรีขันธ์ 2024

    💙 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคกลาง "เจ้าชายสายน้ำผึ้งกับพระนางสร้อยดอกหมาก"
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณธนัชพร พานแก้ว (มุกกุ) มิสแกรนด์สุพรรณบุรี 2022

    💚 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคกลาง "ประเพณีหงษ์ธงตะขาบ"
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณกุลธิดา ทองเลิศ (พิกุล) มิสแกรนด์กาญจนบุรี 2024

    💛 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคอีสาน" ที่นำวัฒนธรรมชาว "กูย"
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณพีรดา ยอดใจ (ดาว) มิสแกรนด์สมุทรปราการ 2021-2022

    🧡 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคอีสาน" พิธีความเชื่อรักษาอาการป่วย
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณเอลิชา แสงโชติ (ลูกพีช) รองชนะเลิศอันดับ 1 มิสแกรนด์ลำพูน 2024

    ❤️ ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคใต้" กลุ่มคนชาวเผ่าทางภาคใต้
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณ กนกวรรณ นันสูงเนิน (จ๊ะจ๋า) มิสแกรนด์สุพรรณบุรี 2024

    🩷 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคใต้" ประเพณีตและความเป็นเอกลักษณ์ของชาวใต้
    ผู้สวมใส่ชุด
    คุณสุทธิพร อ่วมกอง (แบมแบม) มิสแกรนด์พะเยา 2024

    #DEKSBAC67 #เรียนกราฟิกชีวิตออกแบบได้
    #SBAC #BuildingFutureSkills
    #ปวช #ปวส #อาชีวศึกษา #thaitimes
    #thaitimesเยาวชน
    การออกแบบชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ 4 ภาค" จำนวน 8 ชุด ผลงานออกแบบโดยนักศึกษา ระดับ ปวส.1 SBAC - Digital Graphic และผลงานตัดเย็บชุดโดย ร้านเช่าชุด SmileWay และการแสดงแบบโดยนางแบบมืออาชีพระดับเวทีนางงาม 💜 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคเหนือ "ผีกะ" ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณศุภิสรา แสงทอง (ส้มส้ม) มิสแกรนด์ปราจีนบุรี 2023 🩵 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคเหนือ "ฟ้อนกิงกะลา" ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณปลายฟ้า ทองดอนพุ่ม (ปลายฟ้า) มิสแกรนด์ประจวบคีรีขันธ์ 2024 💙 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคกลาง "เจ้าชายสายน้ำผึ้งกับพระนางสร้อยดอกหมาก" ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณธนัชพร พานแก้ว (มุกกุ) มิสแกรนด์สุพรรณบุรี 2022 💚 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคกลาง "ประเพณีหงษ์ธงตะขาบ" ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณกุลธิดา ทองเลิศ (พิกุล) มิสแกรนด์กาญจนบุรี 2024 💛 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคอีสาน" ที่นำวัฒนธรรมชาว "กูย" ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณพีรดา ยอดใจ (ดาว) มิสแกรนด์สมุทรปราการ 2021-2022 🧡 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคอีสาน" พิธีความเชื่อรักษาอาการป่วย ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณเอลิชา แสงโชติ (ลูกพีช) รองชนะเลิศอันดับ 1 มิสแกรนด์ลำพูน 2024 ❤️ ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคใต้" กลุ่มคนชาวเผ่าทางภาคใต้ ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณ กนกวรรณ นันสูงเนิน (จ๊ะจ๋า) มิสแกรนด์สุพรรณบุรี 2024 🩷 ชุด "ชาติพันธุ์ ประจำภาคใต้" ประเพณีตและความเป็นเอกลักษณ์ของชาวใต้ ผู้สวมใส่ชุด คุณสุทธิพร อ่วมกอง (แบมแบม) มิสแกรนด์พะเยา 2024 #DEKSBAC67 #เรียนกราฟิกชีวิตออกแบบได้ #SBAC #BuildingFutureSkills #ปวช #ปวส #อาชีวศึกษา #thaitimes #thaitimesเยาวชน
    0 ความคิดเห็น 1 การแบ่งปัน 1040 มุมมอง 251 0 รีวิว
  • Understand The Difference Between Ethos, Pathos, And Logos To Make Your Point

    During an argument, people will often say whatever is necessary to win. If that is the case, they would certainly need to understand the three modes of persuasion, also commonly known as the three rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. In short, these three words refer to three main methods that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. As you’re about to find out, the modes of persuasion are important because a speaker who knows how to effectively use them will have a significant advantage over someone who doesn’t.

    The terms ethos, pathos, and logos and the theory of their use can be traced back to ancient Greece to the philosophy of Aristotle. Aristotle used these three concepts in his explanations of rhetoric, or the art of influencing the thought and conduct of an audience. For Aristotle, the three modes of persuasion specifically referred to the three major parts of an argument: the speaker (ethos), the argument itself (logos), and the audience (pathos). In particular, Aristotle focused on the speaker’s character, the logic and reason presented by an argument, and the emotional impact the argument had on an audience.

    While they have ancient roots, these modes of persuasion are alive and well today. Put simply, ethos refers to persuasion based on the credibility or authority of the speaker, pathos refers to persuasion based on emotion, and logos refers to persuasion based on logic or reason.

    By effectively using the three modes of persuasion with a large supply of rhetorical devices, a speaker or writer can become a master of rhetoric and win nearly any argument or win over any audience. Before they can do that, though, they must know exactly what ethos, pathos, and logos mean. Fortunately, we are going to look closely at each of these three ideas and see if they are really as effective as they are said to be.

    Quick summary

    Ethos, pathos, and logos are the three classical modes of persuasion that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. Specifically:

    ethos (character): known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” This is the method in which a person relies on their credibility or character when making an appeal or an argument.

    pathos (emotions): known as “the appeal to emotion.” Pathos refers to the method of trying to persuade an audience by eliciting some kind of emotional reaction.

    logos (logic): known as “the appeal to reason.” This method involves using facts and logical reasoning to support an argument and persuade an audience.


    What is ethos?

    The word ethos comes straight from Greek. In Greek, ethos literally translates to “habit,” “custom,” or “character.” Ethos is related to the words ethic and ethical, which are typically used to refer to behavior that is or isn’t acceptable for a particular person.

    In rhetoric, the word ethos is used to refer to the character or reputation of the speaker. As a rhetorical appeal, ethos is known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” When it comes to ethos, one important consideration is how the speaker carries themself and how they present themselves to the audience: Does it seem like they know what they are talking about? Do they even believe the words they are saying? Are they an expert? Do they have some experience or skills that tell us we should listen to them?

    Ethos is important in rhetoric because it often influences the opinion or mood of the audience. If a speaker seems unenthusiastic, unprepared, or inexperienced, the audience is more likely to discount the speaker’s argument regardless of what it even is. On the other hand, a knowledgeable, authoritative, confident speaker is much more likely to win an audience over.

    Ethos often depends on more than just the argument itself. For example, a speaker’s word choice, grammar, and diction also contribute to ethos; an audience may react more favorably toward a professional speaker who has a good grasp of industry jargon and enunciates clearly versus a speaker who lacks the necessary vocabulary and fails to enunciate. Ethos can also be influenced by nonverbal factors as well, such as posture, body language, eye contact, and even the speaker’s choice of clothing. For example, a military officer proudly wearing their uniform bedecked with medals will go a long way to establishing ethos without them saying a single word.

    Here as a simple example of ethos:

    “As a former mayor of this city, I believe we can solve this crisis if we band together.”
    The speaker uses ethos by alerting the audience of their credentials and experience. By doing so, they rely on their reputation to be more persuasive. This “as a…” method of establishing ethos is common, and you have probably seen it used in many persuasive advertisements and speeches.


    What is pathos?

    In Greek, pathos literally translates to “suffering, experience, or sensation.” The word pathos is related to the words pathetic, sympathy, and empathy, which all have to do with emotions or emotional connections. Aristotle used the word pathos to refer to the emotional impact that an argument had on an audience; this usage is still mainly how pathos is used in rhetoric today.

    As a rhetorical appeal, pathos is referred to as “the appeal to emotion.” Generally speaking, an author or speaker is using pathos when they are trying to persuade an audience by causing some kind of emotional reaction. When it comes to pathos, any and all emotions are on the table: sadness, fear, hope, joy, anger, lust, pity, etc.

    As you probably know from your own life, emotions are a powerful motivating factor. For this reason, relying on pathos is often a smart and effective strategy for persuading an audience. Both positive and negative emotions can heavily influence an audience: for example, an audience will want to support a speaker whose position will make them happy, a speaker who wants to end their sadness, or a speaker who is opposed to something that makes them angry.

    Here is a simple example of pathos:

    “Every day, the rainforests shrink and innocent animals are killed. We must do something about this calamitous trend before the planet we call our home is damaged beyond repair.”
    Here, the author is trying to win over an audience by making them feel sad, concerned, or afraid. The author’s choice of words like “innocent” and “calamitous” enforce the fact that they are trying to rely on pathos.


    What is logos?

    In Greek, the word logos literally translates to “word, reason, or discourse.” The word logos is related to many different words that have to do with reason, discourse, or knowledge, such as logic, logical, and any words that end in the suffixes -logy or -logue.

    As a mode of persuasion and rhetorical appeal, logos is often referred to as “the appeal to reason.” If a speaker or author is relying on logos, they are typically reciting facts or providing data and statistics that support their argument. In a manner of speaking, logos does away with all of the bells and whistles of ethos and pathos and cuts to the chase by trying to present a rational argument.

    Logos can be effective in arguments because, in theory, it is impossible to argue against truth and facts. An audience is more likely to agree with a speaker who can provide strong, factual evidence that shows their position is correct. On the flip side, an audience is less likely to support an argument that is flawed or entirely wrong. Going further, a speaker that presents a lot of supporting evidence and data to the audience is likely to come across as knowledgeable and someone to be listened to, which earns bonus points in ethos as well.

    While Aristotle clearly valued an argument based on reason very highly, we know that logos alone doesn’t always effectively persuade an audience. In your own life, you have likely seen a rational, correct speaker lose an argument to a charismatic, authoritative speaker who may not have the facts right.

    Here is a simple example of logos:

    “According to market research, sales of computer chips have increased by 300% in the last five years. Analysis of the industry tells us that the market share of computer chips is dominated by Asian manufacturers. It is clear that the Asian technology sector will continue to experience rapid growth for the foreseeable future.”
    In this paragraph, the author is using data, statistics, and logical reasoning to make their argument. They clearly hope to use logos to try to convince an audience to agree with them.

    Examples of ethos, pathos, and logos
    Ethos, pathos, and logos can all be employed to deliver compelling and persuasive arguments or to win over an audience. Let’s look at a variety of examples to see how different speakers and authors have turned to these modes of persuasion over the years.


    ethos

    “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.
    He was my friend, faithful and just to me […] You all did see that on the Lupercal
    I thrice presented him a kingly crown,
    Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”
    —Marc Antony, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    In this scene, Marc Antony is trying to win over the Roman people, so Shakespeare has Antony rely on ethos. Antony is establishing himself as both a person of authority in Rome (having the power to offer Caesar a crown) and an expert on Caesar’s true character (Antony was Caesar’s close friend and advisor).

    “During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the world’s first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple’s current renaissance.”
    —Steve Jobs, 2005

    Here, Steve Jobs is providing his background–via humblebrag– of being a major figure in several different highly successful tech companies. Jobs is using ethos to provide substance to his words and make it clear to the audience that he knows what he is talking about and they should listen to him.


    pathos

    “Moreover, though you hate both him and his gifts with all your heart, yet pity the rest of the Achaeans who are being harassed in all their host; they will honour you as a god, and you will earn great glory at their hands. You might even kill Hector; he will come within your reach, for he is infatuated, and declares that not a Danaan whom the ships have brought can hold his own against him.”
    —Ulysses to Achilles, The Iliad by Homer

    In this plea, Ulysses is doing his best to pile on the pathos. In one paragraph, Ulysses is attempting to appeal to several of Achilles’s emotions: his hatred of Hector, his infamous stubborn pride, his sympathy for civilians, and his desire for vengeance.

    “I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest—quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality.”
    —Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 1963

    In this excerpt from his “I Have A Dream” speech, King is using pathos to accomplish two goals at once. First, he is connecting with his audience by making it clear is aware of their plight and suffering. Second, he is citing these examples to cause sadness or outrage in the audience. Both of these effects will make an audience interested in what he has to say and more likely to support his position.


    logos

    “Let it be remembered how powerful the influence of a single introduced tree or mammal has been shown to be. But in the case of an island, or of a country partly surrounded by barriers, into which new and better adapted forms could not freely enter, we should then have places in the economy of nature which would assuredly be better filled up if some of the original inhabitants were in some manner modified; for, had the area been open to immigration, these same places would have been seized on by intruders. In such case, every slight modification, which in the course of ages chanced to arise, and which in any way favoured the individuals of any of the species, by better adapting them to their altered conditions, would tend to be preserved; and natural selection would have free scope for the work of improvement.”
    —Charles Darwin, On the Origin of the Species, 1859

    In this passage, Darwin is using logos by presenting a rational argument in support of natural selection. Darwin connects natural selection to established scientific knowledge to argue that it makes logical sense that animals would adapt to better survive in their environment.

    “I often echo the point made by the climate scientist James Hansen: The accumulation of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases—some of which will envelop the planet for hundreds and possibly thousands of years—is now trapping as much extra energy daily as 500,000 Hiroshima-class atomic bombs would release every 24 hours. This is the crisis we face.”
    —Al Gore, “The Climate Crisis Is the Battle of Our Time, and We Can Win,” 2019

    In this call to action, Al Gore uses logos to attempt to convince his audience of the significance of climate change. In order to do this, Gore both cites an expert in the field and provides a scientifically accurate simile to explain the scale of the effect that greenhouse gases have on Earth’s atmosphere.


    What are mythos and kairos?

    Some modern scholars may also use terms mythos and kairos when discussing modes of persuasion or rhetoric in general.

    Aristotle used the term mythos to refer to the plot or story structure of Greek tragedies, i.e., how a playwright ordered the events of the story to affect the audience. Today, mythos is most often discussed as a literary or poetic term rather than a rhetorical one. However, mythos may rarely be referred to as the “appeal to culture” or the “appeal to myth” if it is treated as an additional mode of persuasion. According to this viewpoint, a speaker/writer is using mythos if they try to persuade an audience using shared cultural customs or societal values.

    A commonly cited example of mythos is King’s “I Have a Dream” speech quoted earlier. King says:

    “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men—yes, black men as well as white men—would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable rights’ of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ ”

    Throughout the speech, King repeatedly uses American symbols and American history (mythos) to argue that all Americans should be outraged that Black Americans have been denied freedom and civil rights.

    Some modern scholars may also consider kairos as an additional mode of persuasion. Kairos is usually defined as referring to the specific time and place that a speaker chooses to deliver their speech. For written rhetoric, the “place” instead refers to the specific medium or publication in which a piece of writing appears.

    Unlike the other modes of persuasion, kairos relates to the context of a speech and how the appropriateness (or not) of a setting affects how effective a speaker is. Once again, King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is a great example of the use of kairos. This speech was delivered at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation at the end of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Clearly, King intended to use kairos to enhance the importance and timeliness of this landmark speech.

    Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    Understand The Difference Between Ethos, Pathos, And Logos To Make Your Point During an argument, people will often say whatever is necessary to win. If that is the case, they would certainly need to understand the three modes of persuasion, also commonly known as the three rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. In short, these three words refer to three main methods that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. As you’re about to find out, the modes of persuasion are important because a speaker who knows how to effectively use them will have a significant advantage over someone who doesn’t. The terms ethos, pathos, and logos and the theory of their use can be traced back to ancient Greece to the philosophy of Aristotle. Aristotle used these three concepts in his explanations of rhetoric, or the art of influencing the thought and conduct of an audience. For Aristotle, the three modes of persuasion specifically referred to the three major parts of an argument: the speaker (ethos), the argument itself (logos), and the audience (pathos). In particular, Aristotle focused on the speaker’s character, the logic and reason presented by an argument, and the emotional impact the argument had on an audience. While they have ancient roots, these modes of persuasion are alive and well today. Put simply, ethos refers to persuasion based on the credibility or authority of the speaker, pathos refers to persuasion based on emotion, and logos refers to persuasion based on logic or reason. By effectively using the three modes of persuasion with a large supply of rhetorical devices, a speaker or writer can become a master of rhetoric and win nearly any argument or win over any audience. Before they can do that, though, they must know exactly what ethos, pathos, and logos mean. Fortunately, we are going to look closely at each of these three ideas and see if they are really as effective as they are said to be. Quick summary Ethos, pathos, and logos are the three classical modes of persuasion that a person can use to speak or write persuasively. Specifically: ethos (character): known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” This is the method in which a person relies on their credibility or character when making an appeal or an argument. pathos (emotions): known as “the appeal to emotion.” Pathos refers to the method of trying to persuade an audience by eliciting some kind of emotional reaction. logos (logic): known as “the appeal to reason.” This method involves using facts and logical reasoning to support an argument and persuade an audience. What is ethos? The word ethos comes straight from Greek. In Greek, ethos literally translates to “habit,” “custom,” or “character.” Ethos is related to the words ethic and ethical, which are typically used to refer to behavior that is or isn’t acceptable for a particular person. In rhetoric, the word ethos is used to refer to the character or reputation of the speaker. As a rhetorical appeal, ethos is known as “the appeal to authority” or “the appeal to credibility.” When it comes to ethos, one important consideration is how the speaker carries themself and how they present themselves to the audience: Does it seem like they know what they are talking about? Do they even believe the words they are saying? Are they an expert? Do they have some experience or skills that tell us we should listen to them? Ethos is important in rhetoric because it often influences the opinion or mood of the audience. If a speaker seems unenthusiastic, unprepared, or inexperienced, the audience is more likely to discount the speaker’s argument regardless of what it even is. On the other hand, a knowledgeable, authoritative, confident speaker is much more likely to win an audience over. Ethos often depends on more than just the argument itself. For example, a speaker’s word choice, grammar, and diction also contribute to ethos; an audience may react more favorably toward a professional speaker who has a good grasp of industry jargon and enunciates clearly versus a speaker who lacks the necessary vocabulary and fails to enunciate. Ethos can also be influenced by nonverbal factors as well, such as posture, body language, eye contact, and even the speaker’s choice of clothing. For example, a military officer proudly wearing their uniform bedecked with medals will go a long way to establishing ethos without them saying a single word. Here as a simple example of ethos: “As a former mayor of this city, I believe we can solve this crisis if we band together.” The speaker uses ethos by alerting the audience of their credentials and experience. By doing so, they rely on their reputation to be more persuasive. This “as a…” method of establishing ethos is common, and you have probably seen it used in many persuasive advertisements and speeches. What is pathos? In Greek, pathos literally translates to “suffering, experience, or sensation.” The word pathos is related to the words pathetic, sympathy, and empathy, which all have to do with emotions or emotional connections. Aristotle used the word pathos to refer to the emotional impact that an argument had on an audience; this usage is still mainly how pathos is used in rhetoric today. As a rhetorical appeal, pathos is referred to as “the appeal to emotion.” Generally speaking, an author or speaker is using pathos when they are trying to persuade an audience by causing some kind of emotional reaction. When it comes to pathos, any and all emotions are on the table: sadness, fear, hope, joy, anger, lust, pity, etc. As you probably know from your own life, emotions are a powerful motivating factor. For this reason, relying on pathos is often a smart and effective strategy for persuading an audience. Both positive and negative emotions can heavily influence an audience: for example, an audience will want to support a speaker whose position will make them happy, a speaker who wants to end their sadness, or a speaker who is opposed to something that makes them angry. Here is a simple example of pathos: “Every day, the rainforests shrink and innocent animals are killed. We must do something about this calamitous trend before the planet we call our home is damaged beyond repair.” Here, the author is trying to win over an audience by making them feel sad, concerned, or afraid. The author’s choice of words like “innocent” and “calamitous” enforce the fact that they are trying to rely on pathos. What is logos? In Greek, the word logos literally translates to “word, reason, or discourse.” The word logos is related to many different words that have to do with reason, discourse, or knowledge, such as logic, logical, and any words that end in the suffixes -logy or -logue. As a mode of persuasion and rhetorical appeal, logos is often referred to as “the appeal to reason.” If a speaker or author is relying on logos, they are typically reciting facts or providing data and statistics that support their argument. In a manner of speaking, logos does away with all of the bells and whistles of ethos and pathos and cuts to the chase by trying to present a rational argument. Logos can be effective in arguments because, in theory, it is impossible to argue against truth and facts. An audience is more likely to agree with a speaker who can provide strong, factual evidence that shows their position is correct. On the flip side, an audience is less likely to support an argument that is flawed or entirely wrong. Going further, a speaker that presents a lot of supporting evidence and data to the audience is likely to come across as knowledgeable and someone to be listened to, which earns bonus points in ethos as well. While Aristotle clearly valued an argument based on reason very highly, we know that logos alone doesn’t always effectively persuade an audience. In your own life, you have likely seen a rational, correct speaker lose an argument to a charismatic, authoritative speaker who may not have the facts right. Here is a simple example of logos: “According to market research, sales of computer chips have increased by 300% in the last five years. Analysis of the industry tells us that the market share of computer chips is dominated by Asian manufacturers. It is clear that the Asian technology sector will continue to experience rapid growth for the foreseeable future.” In this paragraph, the author is using data, statistics, and logical reasoning to make their argument. They clearly hope to use logos to try to convince an audience to agree with them. Examples of ethos, pathos, and logos Ethos, pathos, and logos can all be employed to deliver compelling and persuasive arguments or to win over an audience. Let’s look at a variety of examples to see how different speakers and authors have turned to these modes of persuasion over the years. ethos “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me […] You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?” —Marc Antony, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare In this scene, Marc Antony is trying to win over the Roman people, so Shakespeare has Antony rely on ethos. Antony is establishing himself as both a person of authority in Rome (having the power to offer Caesar a crown) and an expert on Caesar’s true character (Antony was Caesar’s close friend and advisor). “During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the world’s first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple’s current renaissance.” —Steve Jobs, 2005 Here, Steve Jobs is providing his background–via humblebrag– of being a major figure in several different highly successful tech companies. Jobs is using ethos to provide substance to his words and make it clear to the audience that he knows what he is talking about and they should listen to him. pathos “Moreover, though you hate both him and his gifts with all your heart, yet pity the rest of the Achaeans who are being harassed in all their host; they will honour you as a god, and you will earn great glory at their hands. You might even kill Hector; he will come within your reach, for he is infatuated, and declares that not a Danaan whom the ships have brought can hold his own against him.” —Ulysses to Achilles, The Iliad by Homer In this plea, Ulysses is doing his best to pile on the pathos. In one paragraph, Ulysses is attempting to appeal to several of Achilles’s emotions: his hatred of Hector, his infamous stubborn pride, his sympathy for civilians, and his desire for vengeance. “I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest—quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality.” —Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 1963 In this excerpt from his “I Have A Dream” speech, King is using pathos to accomplish two goals at once. First, he is connecting with his audience by making it clear is aware of their plight and suffering. Second, he is citing these examples to cause sadness or outrage in the audience. Both of these effects will make an audience interested in what he has to say and more likely to support his position. logos “Let it be remembered how powerful the influence of a single introduced tree or mammal has been shown to be. But in the case of an island, or of a country partly surrounded by barriers, into which new and better adapted forms could not freely enter, we should then have places in the economy of nature which would assuredly be better filled up if some of the original inhabitants were in some manner modified; for, had the area been open to immigration, these same places would have been seized on by intruders. In such case, every slight modification, which in the course of ages chanced to arise, and which in any way favoured the individuals of any of the species, by better adapting them to their altered conditions, would tend to be preserved; and natural selection would have free scope for the work of improvement.” —Charles Darwin, On the Origin of the Species, 1859 In this passage, Darwin is using logos by presenting a rational argument in support of natural selection. Darwin connects natural selection to established scientific knowledge to argue that it makes logical sense that animals would adapt to better survive in their environment. “I often echo the point made by the climate scientist James Hansen: The accumulation of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases—some of which will envelop the planet for hundreds and possibly thousands of years—is now trapping as much extra energy daily as 500,000 Hiroshima-class atomic bombs would release every 24 hours. This is the crisis we face.” —Al Gore, “The Climate Crisis Is the Battle of Our Time, and We Can Win,” 2019 In this call to action, Al Gore uses logos to attempt to convince his audience of the significance of climate change. In order to do this, Gore both cites an expert in the field and provides a scientifically accurate simile to explain the scale of the effect that greenhouse gases have on Earth’s atmosphere. What are mythos and kairos? Some modern scholars may also use terms mythos and kairos when discussing modes of persuasion or rhetoric in general. Aristotle used the term mythos to refer to the plot or story structure of Greek tragedies, i.e., how a playwright ordered the events of the story to affect the audience. Today, mythos is most often discussed as a literary or poetic term rather than a rhetorical one. However, mythos may rarely be referred to as the “appeal to culture” or the “appeal to myth” if it is treated as an additional mode of persuasion. According to this viewpoint, a speaker/writer is using mythos if they try to persuade an audience using shared cultural customs or societal values. A commonly cited example of mythos is King’s “I Have a Dream” speech quoted earlier. King says: “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men—yes, black men as well as white men—would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable rights’ of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ ” Throughout the speech, King repeatedly uses American symbols and American history (mythos) to argue that all Americans should be outraged that Black Americans have been denied freedom and civil rights. Some modern scholars may also consider kairos as an additional mode of persuasion. Kairos is usually defined as referring to the specific time and place that a speaker chooses to deliver their speech. For written rhetoric, the “place” instead refers to the specific medium or publication in which a piece of writing appears. Unlike the other modes of persuasion, kairos relates to the context of a speech and how the appropriateness (or not) of a setting affects how effective a speaker is. Once again, King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is a great example of the use of kairos. This speech was delivered at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation at the end of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Clearly, King intended to use kairos to enhance the importance and timeliness of this landmark speech. Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 567 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • ว่าด้วยเรื่องการดูแลผู้ใต้บังคับบัญชา...
    ถ้าได้มีลูกน้องในหลายๆระดับก็จะมีทั้งความสนุก มันส์ ฮา ความเออ ออ ความทุกข์ที่ลูกน้องเราก่อ หรือความเอากลับมาคิดหลังเราตำหนิเขา ว่าแรงไปไหม เขาจะคิดได้ไหม เขาจะมองว่ายังงัย บลาๆๆ
    มีหลายหลายตำราที่ได้ฟังได้อ่านมาในเรื่องการวิเคราะห์ดูลูกน้อง และให้งานแต่ละคนตามความเหมาะสม จากที่เจอมากับการปกครองลูกน้องร้อยกว่าชีวิตตั้งแต่ระดับต้นๆยันระดับจัดการก็จะมี....
    1. ขยัน แต่ไม่ฉลาด เติบโตมาจากความขยัน มาแต่เช้าตรู่ แม้จะทำงานบ้างไม่ทำงานบ้าง แต่ก็ไม่เคยขาด ลา มาสาย ข้อเสียคือมักจะตัดสินใจผิดเสมอ ไปจนถึงสถานการณ์จริงแก้ปัญหาไม่ได้ เน้นใช้งานลูกน้องเป็นหลัก (แม้แต่งานตัวเอง) กลุ่มนี้ต้องมอบหมายงานที่เป็นประจำๆเป็นหลัก หลีกเลี่ยงงานที่ต้องให้วิเคราะห์ ตัดสินใจ หรือโปรเจ็กใหม่ๆ
    2. ฉลาด แต่ขี้เกียจ กลุ่มนี้นี่แค่เกริ่นคร่าวๆให้ฟัง ก็คิดต่อ คิดตามได้เลย พวกเขาจะประยุกต์ และคิดวิธีใหม่ๆได้เสมอ และมักที่จะ get the job done แต่ข้อเสียคือ ไม่ค่อยเล่นเป็นทีม (ต่อให้เป็นระดับหัวหน้าทีมเล้วตาม ก็จะมองที่งานของตัวเองให้รอดก่อน) ขี้เกียจ ขี้เบื่อ ลาบ่อย ถ้าเบื่อมากๆก็จะหรอยไปโน่นนี่นั่น รวมไปถึงมีทัศนคติที่สูง ถ้าจะให้เขาเคารพคุณแบบหัวหน้า คุณก็ต้องพิสูจน์ฝีมือให้เขาดูก่อน ปกป้องสิทธิของตัวเองเป็นหลักก่อนเสมอ กลุ่มนี้จะต้องมอบงานที่ท้าทาย หรือไม่เคยทำมาก่อนในแผนก ไม่ต้องจูงมือให้เขาทำ หรือให้เขาเดินตามทางเรา เขาจะหาทางทำ และไปถึงจุดหมายด้วยตัวเอง แต่พองานเสร็จแล้วคุณจำเป็นต้องมานั่งคุยกับเขาด้วย ว่างานนี้อะไรดีไม่ดี อะไรต้องปรับปรุง เพราะไม่งั้นเขาจะมองว่างานเขาดีเลิศที่หนึ่ง และอย่าไปมอบงานประจำน่าเบื่อๆให้ล่ะ รับรองหรอยไปเดินเล่น หรือนั่งดูซีรีย์ตั้งแต่สามวันแรกแน่นอน
    3. กลุ่มน้ำเต็มแก้วที่จมปลักอยู่กับสิ่งตัวเองคิดว่าเป็น achievement กลุ่มนี้จะมีทั้งเด็ก และผู้ใหญ่ เป็นกลุ่มที่มักจะพูดให้คนอื่นฟังว่าเคยทำอะไรมาก่อน งานเก่าประสบความสำเร็จยังไง เคยผ่านงานลำบากขนาดไหน เคยเข้าประชุมประสานงานกับผู้บริหารหรือเจ้าของมาแล้ว บลาๆๆๆ แต่ก็ไม่ใช่ว่าไม่ดีซะทั้งหมด ผมมองว่ากลุ่มนี้เหมือนเตียวหุย มีฝีมือ แต่ประมาท และไม่ค่อยชอบเรียนรู้เพิ่ม สกิลหลักของกลุ่มนี้คือการพูด การเข้าหา และการพรีเซนต์ ถ้าคุณใช้เขาให้ถูกที่ ถูกเวลา ถูกสถานการณ์ เขาจะช่วยประหยัดเวลาคุณในการที่ต้องเข้าไปประชุม หรือจัดการด้วยตัวเองเยอะ แต่ข้อเสียกลุ่มนี้คือ ไม่ชอบ หรือไม่ถนัดการทำ full report หรือ analysis report เลย และอย่าไปยัดเยียดอะไรใหม่ๆให้เขาเรียนรู้ เพราะเขาจะมองว่าสกิลเขามีเพียงพอแล้ว
    4. กลุ่มเพชรในตม คนที่เรามองข้าม อาจจะด้วยความที่เขาเป็นระดับเล็ก ไม่มีโอกาสได้คุยกับเรามากนัก หรือเรามองเลยไป กลุ่มนี้มี potential สูง หรือมี skill ที่ดี แต่อาจไม่ไดโอกาสในการแสดง ซึ่งถ้าขัดเกลา หรือเพิ่มการเรียนรู้ให้เขา เขาจะเป็นหัวหน้าที่ดีในอนาคตเลย การที่เราหยุดคุยกับลูกน้องเราสัก 2-3 นาที และให้ระดับหัวหน้า หรือผู้จัดการ พูดคุยถึงลูกน้องตัวเองก็ทำให้เราได้เพชรในตมเหมือนกันนะครับ

    ขยันและฉลาด หายากมาก
    โง่และขี้เกียจ มีนะแต่ไม่ค่อยปล่อยให้อยู่นาน
    น้ำไม่เต็มแก้ว พูดเก่ง มี achievement ไม่ค่อยเจอ ถ้าเจอมักจะเป็นเพชรในตม เพราะมีความถ่อมตนมากกว่า
    วันนี้นึกออกแค่นี้แหละ ขอบคุณครับ
    ว่าด้วยเรื่องการดูแลผู้ใต้บังคับบัญชา... ถ้าได้มีลูกน้องในหลายๆระดับก็จะมีทั้งความสนุก มันส์ ฮา ความเออ ออ ความทุกข์ที่ลูกน้องเราก่อ หรือความเอากลับมาคิดหลังเราตำหนิเขา ว่าแรงไปไหม เขาจะคิดได้ไหม เขาจะมองว่ายังงัย บลาๆๆ มีหลายหลายตำราที่ได้ฟังได้อ่านมาในเรื่องการวิเคราะห์ดูลูกน้อง และให้งานแต่ละคนตามความเหมาะสม จากที่เจอมากับการปกครองลูกน้องร้อยกว่าชีวิตตั้งแต่ระดับต้นๆยันระดับจัดการก็จะมี.... 1. ขยัน แต่ไม่ฉลาด เติบโตมาจากความขยัน มาแต่เช้าตรู่ แม้จะทำงานบ้างไม่ทำงานบ้าง แต่ก็ไม่เคยขาด ลา มาสาย ข้อเสียคือมักจะตัดสินใจผิดเสมอ ไปจนถึงสถานการณ์จริงแก้ปัญหาไม่ได้ เน้นใช้งานลูกน้องเป็นหลัก (แม้แต่งานตัวเอง) กลุ่มนี้ต้องมอบหมายงานที่เป็นประจำๆเป็นหลัก หลีกเลี่ยงงานที่ต้องให้วิเคราะห์ ตัดสินใจ หรือโปรเจ็กใหม่ๆ 2. ฉลาด แต่ขี้เกียจ กลุ่มนี้นี่แค่เกริ่นคร่าวๆให้ฟัง ก็คิดต่อ คิดตามได้เลย พวกเขาจะประยุกต์ และคิดวิธีใหม่ๆได้เสมอ และมักที่จะ get the job done แต่ข้อเสียคือ ไม่ค่อยเล่นเป็นทีม (ต่อให้เป็นระดับหัวหน้าทีมเล้วตาม ก็จะมองที่งานของตัวเองให้รอดก่อน) ขี้เกียจ ขี้เบื่อ ลาบ่อย ถ้าเบื่อมากๆก็จะหรอยไปโน่นนี่นั่น รวมไปถึงมีทัศนคติที่สูง ถ้าจะให้เขาเคารพคุณแบบหัวหน้า คุณก็ต้องพิสูจน์ฝีมือให้เขาดูก่อน ปกป้องสิทธิของตัวเองเป็นหลักก่อนเสมอ กลุ่มนี้จะต้องมอบงานที่ท้าทาย หรือไม่เคยทำมาก่อนในแผนก ไม่ต้องจูงมือให้เขาทำ หรือให้เขาเดินตามทางเรา เขาจะหาทางทำ และไปถึงจุดหมายด้วยตัวเอง แต่พองานเสร็จแล้วคุณจำเป็นต้องมานั่งคุยกับเขาด้วย ว่างานนี้อะไรดีไม่ดี อะไรต้องปรับปรุง เพราะไม่งั้นเขาจะมองว่างานเขาดีเลิศที่หนึ่ง และอย่าไปมอบงานประจำน่าเบื่อๆให้ล่ะ รับรองหรอยไปเดินเล่น หรือนั่งดูซีรีย์ตั้งแต่สามวันแรกแน่นอน 3. กลุ่มน้ำเต็มแก้วที่จมปลักอยู่กับสิ่งตัวเองคิดว่าเป็น achievement กลุ่มนี้จะมีทั้งเด็ก และผู้ใหญ่ เป็นกลุ่มที่มักจะพูดให้คนอื่นฟังว่าเคยทำอะไรมาก่อน งานเก่าประสบความสำเร็จยังไง เคยผ่านงานลำบากขนาดไหน เคยเข้าประชุมประสานงานกับผู้บริหารหรือเจ้าของมาแล้ว บลาๆๆๆ แต่ก็ไม่ใช่ว่าไม่ดีซะทั้งหมด ผมมองว่ากลุ่มนี้เหมือนเตียวหุย มีฝีมือ แต่ประมาท และไม่ค่อยชอบเรียนรู้เพิ่ม สกิลหลักของกลุ่มนี้คือการพูด การเข้าหา และการพรีเซนต์ ถ้าคุณใช้เขาให้ถูกที่ ถูกเวลา ถูกสถานการณ์ เขาจะช่วยประหยัดเวลาคุณในการที่ต้องเข้าไปประชุม หรือจัดการด้วยตัวเองเยอะ แต่ข้อเสียกลุ่มนี้คือ ไม่ชอบ หรือไม่ถนัดการทำ full report หรือ analysis report เลย และอย่าไปยัดเยียดอะไรใหม่ๆให้เขาเรียนรู้ เพราะเขาจะมองว่าสกิลเขามีเพียงพอแล้ว 4. กลุ่มเพชรในตม คนที่เรามองข้าม อาจจะด้วยความที่เขาเป็นระดับเล็ก ไม่มีโอกาสได้คุยกับเรามากนัก หรือเรามองเลยไป กลุ่มนี้มี potential สูง หรือมี skill ที่ดี แต่อาจไม่ไดโอกาสในการแสดง ซึ่งถ้าขัดเกลา หรือเพิ่มการเรียนรู้ให้เขา เขาจะเป็นหัวหน้าที่ดีในอนาคตเลย การที่เราหยุดคุยกับลูกน้องเราสัก 2-3 นาที และให้ระดับหัวหน้า หรือผู้จัดการ พูดคุยถึงลูกน้องตัวเองก็ทำให้เราได้เพชรในตมเหมือนกันนะครับ ขยันและฉลาด หายากมาก โง่และขี้เกียจ มีนะแต่ไม่ค่อยปล่อยให้อยู่นาน น้ำไม่เต็มแก้ว พูดเก่ง มี achievement ไม่ค่อยเจอ ถ้าเจอมักจะเป็นเพชรในตม เพราะมีความถ่อมตนมากกว่า วันนี้นึกออกแค่นี้แหละ ขอบคุณครับ
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 426 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว
  • “Jealousy” vs. “Envy”: Can You Feel The Difference?

    Your coworker has gotten a raise, and it bothers you because you really wish you’d gotten one, too. Is what you’re feeling jealousy or envy? The two feelings are similar, but the words are often used to convey slightly different things, mainly involving whether the feeling is hostile or malicious.

    In this article, we’ll discuss the similarities and differences between jealousy and envy, including the subtle implications of both words, their adjective forms jealous and envious, and some examples of how you can tell when envy has turned to jealousy.

    Quick summary

    Jealousy and envy both involve a feeling of desire for what another person has, but jealousy is usually thought to be more negative—it often involves resentment toward the other person. Envy is also a negative feeling—like a mix of admiration and discontent—but the word doesn’t usually imply hostility. Another difference is that envy can be used as both a noun and a verb.

    What is jealousy?

    Jealousy is a feeling of resentment, bitterness, or hostility toward someone who has something that you don’t. This could be general success, an achievement, a trait, a social advantage, a material possession, or a relationship, among other things. What matters is that the other person has the thing, you want it, and this makes you resentful of them.

    The adjective form of jealousy is jealous.

    When used in the context of romantic relationships, jealousy more specifically refers to a feeling of suspicion or uneasiness that often comes from one’s partner giving or being given positive attention by others.

    What is envy?

    Envy is a negative feeling of desire centered on someone who has something that you do not. Envy can also be a verb meaning to feel this way toward someone. Both the noun and the verb imply that you want to be in the other person’s position—to have what they have. Like jealousy, envy can be centered on any number of things, tangible or intangible.

    Envy can be described as a mix of admiration and discontent. But it’s not necessarily malicious. It can even be used as part of a compliment, as in You’ve worked so hard to achieve your success—I really envy you.

    The adjective form is envious, and you could also call someone’s advantage or trait enviable.

    Green with envy and the green-eyed monster

    Thanks to Shakespeare, there is a strong association between jealousy, envy, and the color green.

    The phrase green with envy means feeling a strong sense of covetousness for what someone else has. Shakespeare described envy as the green sickness in the play Anthony and Cleopatra.

    The term green-eyed monster is a way of referring to jealousy. The first written record of the phrase comes from Shakespeare’s Othello, which is known for its themes of jealousy. In the play, jealousy is said to be “the green-eyed monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.” The phrase may allude to cats, which can have green eyes and are known for playing with their prey. The phrase green-eyed can also be used by itself to mean “jealous.”

    What is the difference between jealousy and envy?
    Both jealousy and envy can involve tangible things (like a possession) and intangible ones (like a certain status, position, skill, trait, or relationship). Although jealousy and envy are sometimes used interchangeably, a distinction is often made relating to the amount of negativity.

    Simply feeling upset that you don’t have what someone else does—and wishing you were in their position—is usually considered envy. By the way, in that hypothetical situation about the coworker at the very start of this article, it sounds more like you’re feeling envy.

    In contrast, feelings of inner resentment and the outward hostility that sometimes results from such feelings are both thought to stem from jealousy.

    However, it is often said that envy can turn into jealousy—and the point at which it does may not be so obvious.

    One distinction that is sometimes made is that jealousy centers its negative focus on the person who has the thing that you don’t, while envy is more centered on the desire for the thing. Of course, however, jealousy can be about both the person and the thing, and so the main difference is usually considered to involve how negative the feeling is.

    A practical difference between jealousy and envy is that jealousy is always a noun, while envy can be a noun or a verb.

    One final difference is that jealousy and the adjective form jealous are also used more specifically in the context of romantic relationships in a way that envy and envious are not.

    Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    “Jealousy” vs. “Envy”: Can You Feel The Difference? Your coworker has gotten a raise, and it bothers you because you really wish you’d gotten one, too. Is what you’re feeling jealousy or envy? The two feelings are similar, but the words are often used to convey slightly different things, mainly involving whether the feeling is hostile or malicious. In this article, we’ll discuss the similarities and differences between jealousy and envy, including the subtle implications of both words, their adjective forms jealous and envious, and some examples of how you can tell when envy has turned to jealousy. Quick summary Jealousy and envy both involve a feeling of desire for what another person has, but jealousy is usually thought to be more negative—it often involves resentment toward the other person. Envy is also a negative feeling—like a mix of admiration and discontent—but the word doesn’t usually imply hostility. Another difference is that envy can be used as both a noun and a verb. What is jealousy? Jealousy is a feeling of resentment, bitterness, or hostility toward someone who has something that you don’t. This could be general success, an achievement, a trait, a social advantage, a material possession, or a relationship, among other things. What matters is that the other person has the thing, you want it, and this makes you resentful of them. The adjective form of jealousy is jealous. When used in the context of romantic relationships, jealousy more specifically refers to a feeling of suspicion or uneasiness that often comes from one’s partner giving or being given positive attention by others. What is envy? Envy is a negative feeling of desire centered on someone who has something that you do not. Envy can also be a verb meaning to feel this way toward someone. Both the noun and the verb imply that you want to be in the other person’s position—to have what they have. Like jealousy, envy can be centered on any number of things, tangible or intangible. Envy can be described as a mix of admiration and discontent. But it’s not necessarily malicious. It can even be used as part of a compliment, as in You’ve worked so hard to achieve your success—I really envy you. The adjective form is envious, and you could also call someone’s advantage or trait enviable. Green with envy and the green-eyed monster Thanks to Shakespeare, there is a strong association between jealousy, envy, and the color green. The phrase green with envy means feeling a strong sense of covetousness for what someone else has. Shakespeare described envy as the green sickness in the play Anthony and Cleopatra. The term green-eyed monster is a way of referring to jealousy. The first written record of the phrase comes from Shakespeare’s Othello, which is known for its themes of jealousy. In the play, jealousy is said to be “the green-eyed monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.” The phrase may allude to cats, which can have green eyes and are known for playing with their prey. The phrase green-eyed can also be used by itself to mean “jealous.” What is the difference between jealousy and envy? Both jealousy and envy can involve tangible things (like a possession) and intangible ones (like a certain status, position, skill, trait, or relationship). Although jealousy and envy are sometimes used interchangeably, a distinction is often made relating to the amount of negativity. Simply feeling upset that you don’t have what someone else does—and wishing you were in their position—is usually considered envy. By the way, in that hypothetical situation about the coworker at the very start of this article, it sounds more like you’re feeling envy. In contrast, feelings of inner resentment and the outward hostility that sometimes results from such feelings are both thought to stem from jealousy. However, it is often said that envy can turn into jealousy—and the point at which it does may not be so obvious. One distinction that is sometimes made is that jealousy centers its negative focus on the person who has the thing that you don’t, while envy is more centered on the desire for the thing. Of course, however, jealousy can be about both the person and the thing, and so the main difference is usually considered to involve how negative the feeling is. A practical difference between jealousy and envy is that jealousy is always a noun, while envy can be a noun or a verb. One final difference is that jealousy and the adjective form jealous are also used more specifically in the context of romantic relationships in a way that envy and envious are not. Copyright 2024, XAKKHRA, All Rights Reserved.
    0 ความคิดเห็น 0 การแบ่งปัน 405 มุมมอง 0 รีวิว